A Phase I Clinical Study Comparing the Tolerance, Immunogenicity, and Pharmacokinetics of Proposed Biosimilar BAT1806 and Reference Tocilizumab in Healthy Chinese Men

Demonstration of Physicochemical and Functional Similarity of the Biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 to Reference Tocilizumab

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Tocilizumab is an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R). BAT1806/BIIB800 (tocilizumab-bavi) has been developed as a biosimilar to the reference product tocilizumab (TCZ). The objective of this study was to demonstrate physicochemical and functional similarity between BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ in a comprehensive comparability exercise.

METHODS

A comprehensive panel of over 20 methods was used to generate datasets comparing critical and non-critical product quality attributes for 10 BAT1806/BIIB800 lots and 44 TCZ lots (16 sourced from China, 16 from the EU, and 12 from the US). Primary structure, higher-order structure, and physicochemical properties were assessed using liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, various spectroscopy techniques/methods, capillary electrophoresis, and thermoanalytical techniques. Fragment antigen-binding (Fab)- and fragment crystallizable (Fc)-mediated biological properties were assessed using cell-based assays, immunoassays, flow cytometry, and kinetic binding assays.

RESULTS

BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ (irrespective of source) were shown to be similar in terms of structural and functional properties. No differences were observed in terms of the most critical quality attributes, that is, soluble-IL-6R binding and inhibition of IL-6-mediated cell proliferation. BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ demonstrated similarity in terms of Fab- and Fc-mediated binding and biological activity. Minor differences were observed in glycosylation (afucosylation and sialylation), glycation, aggregation, and charge variants, which were demonstrated to be not clinically relevant.

CONCLUSION

BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ were highly similar for all critical quality attributes. Where differences were observed in less critical quality attributes, additional analytical assessments and clinical study results determined these to be not clinically meaningful.

Comparing tocilizumab biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 with reference tocilizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase 3, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Biosimilars provide an opportunity to address unmet medical need by expanding access to biological treatments. This study aimed to show equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles of a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800, to reference tocilizumab, in participants with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate.

METHODS

This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, equivalence study comprised a 24-week initial treatment period (results reported here) and a 24-week secondary treatment period. Participants were recruited at 54 centres across five countries (China, Ukraine, Poland, Georgia, and Bulgaria). Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate were randomly assigned (1:1:2) to receive reference tocilizumab up to week 48, or reference tocilizumab up to week 24 followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 up to week 48 (the two reference tocilizumab groups were analysed as a single group in this analysis), or BAT1806/BIIB800 up to week 48 (the BAT1806/BIIB800 group), administered by intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks at a starting dose of 8 mg/kg. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who had a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12 (for the European Medicines Agency [EMA]) or week 24 (for the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] and China National Medical Products Administration [NMPA]) using prespecified equivalence margins (95% CI -14·5 to +14·5 [EMA], 90% CI -12·0 to +15·0 [FDA], and 95% CI -13·6 to +13·6 [NMPA]). The International Council for Harmonisation E9(R1) estimand framework, with strategies for addressing intercurrent events, was implemented for the efficacy evaluations with expected differences as per the predefined equivalence margins. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03830203) and EudraCT (2018-002202-31), and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 19, 2018, and Jan 5, 2021, we randomly assigned 621 participants: 309 to the reference tocilizumab group and 312 to the BAT1806/BIIB800 group. The mean age was 50·5 years (SD 12·0), 534 (86%) were women, 87 (14%) were men, and 368 (59%) were White. For the primary estimands, estimated ACR20 response rates were 64·8% in the reference tocilizumab group and 69·0% in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group (treatment difference 4·1% [95% CI -3·6 to 11·9]) at week 12, and 67·9% in the reference tocilizumab group and 69·9% in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group (treatment difference 1·9% [90% CI -4·0 to 7·9; 95% CI -5·2 to 9·1]) at week 24. All confidence intervals were contained within the predefined equivalence margins. Comparable pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity profiles were observed for the reference tocilizumab and BAT1806/BIIB800 groups. Adverse events were reported by 201 (65%) participants in the reference tocilizumab group and 206 (66%) in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group; 196 (63%) participants in the reference tocilizumab group and 201 (64%) participants in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event. Five participants had a fatal event (reference tocilizumab n=1; BAT1806/BIIB800 n=4).

INTERPRETATION

BAT1806/BIIB800 showed equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles as reference tocilizumab.

FUNDING

Bio-Thera Solutions and Biogen.

A phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of HS628 (tocilizumab biosimilar) and reference tocilizumab in healthy male subjects

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of the proposed biosimilar HS628 compared with the reference tocilizumab (Actemra®) and also to demonstrate similar safety and immunogenicity profiles in healthy Chinese male subjects. Eighty eligible subjects were randomized into two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single intravenous infusion of HS628 or tocilizumab at 4 mg/kg over 60 min. Blood samples were collected at the scheduled time points for PK and immunogenicity analysis. PK biosimilarity was determined using the standard bioequivalence criteria 80%-125%. A total of 77 subjects received the study drug and completed the study. The main PK parameters were similar for the test and reference groups. The ratio of geometric least-squares means (GMR) and its 90% CIs for AUC0-t , AUC0-∞ , and Cmax between the test group and reference group were 1.06 (1.00-1.12), 1.07 (1.00-1.14), and 1.04 (0.99-1.10), respectively, which were fully within the predefined bioequivalent range of 80%-125%. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar for HS628 and tocilizumab (p > 0.05). The most common TEAEs were decreased fibrinogen, decreased neutrophils, pharyngalgia, oral ulcer, decreased leukocytes, and increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The results of the present study provide strong evidence to support the PK similarity and bioequivalence of HS628 and tocilizumab. The safety and immunogenicity profiles of HS628 were also shown to be similar to those of the reference tocilizumab.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of Gerilimzumab (GB224), a recombinant humanized interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, in healthy Chinese adults: A randomized controlled dose-escalation study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of Gerilimzumab (GB224), a recombinant humanized IgG1λ monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6, in healthy Chinese adults.

METHODS

Fifty-eight subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single subcutaneous dose of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 mg GB224 or placebo. Safety assessments were performed, and blood samples were collected for PK, PD, and immunogenicity analyses during a follow-up of 112 days.

RESULTS

The most frequent adverse event was decreased fibrinogen (43.1%). GB224 was absorbed relatively fast with a median T_max of 48 h (24-168 h) but eliminated slowly with a long mean half-life (839.38-981.63 h). Dose proportionality was shown to be in the dose range of 10-30 mg. A dose-dependent increase in serum interleukin-6 concentration from baseline was observed in the subjects receiving GB224. Only two subjects tested positive for antidrug antibodies after administration of GB224.

CONCLUSION

GB224 had a well-tolerated safety profile, desirable PK, and a low immunogenicity following a single-dose subcutaneous administration in healthy Chinese subjects. These findings warrant further investigation.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar MSB11456 versus both the US-licensed and EU-approved products: a randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R). MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456 to both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab.

METHODS

Healthy adult volunteers (N=685) received a single 162 mg subcutaneous injection of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, or EU-approved tocilizumab in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Blood samples were taken predose and for up to 48 days postdose. Primary endpoint pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using analysis of covariance. Secondary pharmacodynamic measures included serum-soluble IL-6R and serum C-reactive protein. Safety data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic equivalence (with all corresponding 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least squares mean ratios within the predefined 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence margin) was demonstrated between MSB11456 and both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab, as well as between the reference products. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated similarity of MSB11456 and both US-licensed and EU-approved tocilizumab, as well as between the reference products. Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were comparable between treatments.

CONCLUSION

: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of MSB11456, US-licensed tocilizumab, and EU-approved tocilizumab were demonstrated, and the three products had comparable immunogenicity and safety, supporting MSB11456 as a biosimilar to tocilizumab.