Effects of Three Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine on Analgesia and the Stress Response in Hypospadias Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Current perspectives in hypospadias research: A scoping review of articles published in 2021 (Review)

Hundreds of papers are written about hypospadias every year referring to all aspects of the pathology, being one of the most common congenital malformations. The present study conducted a scoping review of articles published in 2021 to present the main issues and summarize current perspectives and achievements in the field. It searched for the keyword 'hypospadias' in the three most popular databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). After the analysis of the publications, they were categorized into different domains. The present review was performed respecting the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA ScR) guidelines. A total of 284 articles were included. These were published in 142 different journals. The most accessed was the Journal of Paediatric Urology with 54 articles. The main identified domains were related to surgical techniques, postoperative care, complications, anesthesia, anatomical factors, genetics, environmental factors, endocrinology, associated malformations, questionnaires and recommendations, management, biological materials, animal models, retrospective studies of centers, social media, bibliometrics, small gestational age, neoplasm, or fertility. Promising modifications of existing surgical techniques were presented with improved outcomes for both the proximal and distal types of hypospadias. Relevant anatomical and etiological, and also genetic factors were clarified. Aspects of the peri- and postoperative management referring to the antibiotherapy, analgesia, dressing techniques, and the future use of novel bioengineering agents to prevent, reduce or treat the occurring complications were discussed.

Analgesic effect of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in the postoperative period in children undergoing ultrasound-guided single-shot sacral epidural block: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in prolonging postoperative analgesia and reducing pain scores in children undergoing surgery.

Methods

Five online databases were searched for RCTs on postoperative analgesia of pediatric patients undergoing ultrasound-guided single-shot sacral epidural block with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine up to January 2, 2023. Pain score and sedation score at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after the operation, the time of first receiving additional analgesic drugs, and the number of postoperative adverse effects were selected to compare the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with ropivacaine alone for pediatrics. The standard mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated by using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 295 articles were retrieved, but only 20 records were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for sacral epidural block in children undergoing ultrasound-guided single-shot sacral epidural block had a more prolonged analgesia effect (SMD = 3.47, 95%CI: 2.80, 4.14). There were lower analgesia scores at 2 h(T₁), 4 h(T₂), 8 h(T₃), 12 h(T₄), and 24 h(T₅) in postoperative period (T₁ : SMD = -1.02, 95%CI: -1.31, -0.72; T₂ : SMD = -1.02, 95%CI: -1.32, -0.72; T₃ : SMD = -0.84, 95%CI: -1.12, -0.56; T₄ : SMD = -0.61, 95%CI: -1.03, -0.20; T₅ : SMD = -1.03, 95%CI: -1.28, -0.78). And the incidence of adverse effects was similar between the two groups (OR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59, 1.18).

Conclusions

The results of this review and meta-analysis support that dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant to ropivacaine, can improve postoperative analgesia of surgery and significantly prolong the analgesic time in children, with a similar incidence rate of adverse symptoms when compared with ropivacaine alone.