Clinical Outcomes of Tanezumab With Different Dosages for Patient With Osteoarthritis: Network Meta-Analysis

Emerging injectable therapies for osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) affects more than 240 million people worldwide. In 2016, the Osteoarthritis Research Society International submitted a report to the United States Food and Drug Administration highlighting OA as a 'serious' disease, and appealed for the urgent development and review of new therapies to address a significant unmet need. Despite this, international guidelines for the treatment of OA have been largely unchanged for over a decade. There is now an updated understanding that OA is more than simply a non-inflammatory 'wear-and-tear' process involving articular cartilage. Based on this, potential emerging therapies are being developed that target novel inflammatory, pain, and regeneration pathways. Drugs targeting the latter are being lauded as 'Disease-Modifying Osteoarthritis Drugs' - a concept which has so far proved elusive in OA research. While this review does not recommend a change in current practice, it should prompt readers to rethink the OA treatment paradigm. The global pandemic has added another layer of consideration when managing patients with OA. At a time when there is more strain on hospital systems, there is a need to expand our pharmacological armamentarium in order to manage OA without elective surgery and hospital admission.

Effectiveness of Various Dosages and Administration Methods of Tanezumab for the Treatment of Pain in Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: a Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses have reported the superiority of tanezumab versus placebo in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). However, they did not compare different injection methods (intravenous or subcutaneous), doses of injection.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of different dosages and methods of injection of tanezumab on relieving pain in patients with OA.

METHODS

An online systematic search was performed by using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to November 9, 2019. The goal was to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that concentrated on the therapeutic effects of different dosages and methods of injection of tanezumab in patients with OA. The pairwise meta-analyses with the fixed effects model were undertaken with the "meta" package using R 3.6.0 programming language. In addition, an NMA with fixed effects was assessed using a gemtc software. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve value of each intervention was calculated to obtain a hierarchy of treatments.

RESULTS

Of the 328 RCTs identified through the literature search, 12 RCTs were included in the current NMA. In terms of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and physical function subscales, the most effective treatment was intravenous injection of tanezumab (10 mg; surface under the cumulative ranking curve values of 90% and 88%, respectively), and the least effective therapy was subcutaneous injection of tanezumab (2.5 mg; 20% and 19%).

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve high therapeutic efficacy and avoid treatment failure, an intravenous injection of tanezumab (10 mg) is recommended as an efficacious therapy, facilitating pain relief in patients with OA. However, this conclusion may also be affected by the limitations of this study owing to the small sample size and data heterogeneity, and further research should therefore be conducted to eliminate these limitations and to confirm the findings.

Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future

Chronic pain remains a major problem worldwide, despite the availability of various non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options. Therefore, new analgesics with novel mechanisms of action are needed. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are directed against specific, targeted molecules involved in pain signaling and processing pathways that look to be very effective and promising as a novel therapy in pain management. Thus, there are mAbs against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or interleukin-6 (IL-6), among others, which are already recommended in the treatment of chronic pain conditions such as osteoarthritis, chronic lower back pain, migraine, or rheumatoid arthritis that are under preclinical research. This narrative review summarizes the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of these agents in the treatment of chronic pain.