1
|
Coraci D, Maccarone MC, Ragazzo L, Tognolo L, Restivo DA, Santilli G, Moreira AL, Ferrara PE, Ronconi G, Masiero S. Botulinum toxin in the rehabilitation of painful syndromes: multiperspective literature analysis, lexical analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Transl Myol 2024. [PMID: 38767308 DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Pain represents a common symptom of several diseases and is often associated with a reduction in rehabilitation outcomes and recovery. The effectiveness of pain alleviation by botulinum toxin has been recently demonstrated. We searched in PubMed the papers about this topic published in the last ten years, and we selected clinical trials, guidelines, meta-analyses, reviews, and systematic reviews. We used different approaches: multiperspective presentation, lexical evaluation, and systematic review. The systematic review was only performed for the randomized controlled trials. We predominantly found reviews and trials about the rehabilitation of stroke/brain injury and epicondylitis. The most common outcome measures were pain, function, and spasticity. Among the common words, pain was the most frequent and the terms were grouped into different families, especially concerning the outcomes. Rehabilitation showed a relatively low frequency. Finally, the systematic review showed moderate-low levels of bias which confirms the effectiveness of botulinum toxin for pain treatment. The current literature about botulinum toxin is wide and globally diffuse but with some limitations in study strategies and clearness in the formal presentation. The evidence justifies the use of botulinum toxin in treating pain in different diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Coraci
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padua.
| | | | - Lisa Ragazzo
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padua.
| | - Lucrezia Tognolo
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padua.
| | | | - Gabriele Santilli
- Department of Anatomical, Histological and Legal Medical Sciences and Science of the Locomotor System, Rome.
| | - Ana Lucila Moreira
- Department of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
| | | | | | - Stefano Masiero
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, Padua.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Riganello F, Tonin P, Soddu A. I Feel! Therefore, I Am from Pain to Consciousness in DOC Patients. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11825. [PMID: 37511583 PMCID: PMC10380260 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain assessment and management in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) is a challenging and important aspect of care, with implications for detecting consciousness and promoting recovery. This narrative review explores the role of pain in consciousness, the challenges of pain assessment, pharmacological treatment in DOC, and the implications of pain assessment when detecting changes in consciousness. The review discusses the Nociception Coma Scale and its revised version, which are behavioral scales used to assess pain in DOC patients, and the challenges and controversies surrounding the appropriate pharmacological treatment of pain in these patients. Moreover, we highlight recent evidence suggesting that an accurate pain assessment may predict changes in the level of consciousness in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state patients, underscoring the importance of ongoing pain management in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Riganello
- Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation, S. Anna Institute, 88900 Crotone, Italy
| | - Paolo Tonin
- Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation, S. Anna Institute, 88900 Crotone, Italy
| | - Andrea Soddu
- Physics, and Astronomy Department, Western Institute for Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baek J, Won K, Kim H, Lee S, An J, Jun SC. Pain Classification using Evoked EEG Induced by Thermal Grill Illusion - Deep Neural Network Approach. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023; 2023:1-4. [PMID: 38083440 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
As the quantification of pain has emerged in biomedical engineering today, studies have been developing biomarkers associated with pain actively by measuring bio-signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG). Recently, some EEG studies of cold and hot pain have been reported. However, they used one type of stimulus condition for each trial and a relatively long stimulation time to collect EEG features. In this study, EEG signals during Cool (20 °C), Warm (40 °C), and Thermal Grill Illusion (TGI, 20-40 °C) stimuli were collected from 43 subjects, and were classified by a deep convolutional neural network referred to as EEGNet. Three binary classifications for the three conditions (TGI, Cool, Warm) were conducted for each subject individually. Classification accuracies for TGI-Cool, TGI-Warm, and Warm-Cool were 0.74±0.01, 0.71±0.01, and 0.74±0.01, respectively. For subjects who rated the TGI significantly hotter than the Warm stimulus, the classification accuracy for TGI-Cool (0.74±0.01) was significantly higher than for TGI-Warm (0.71±0.01). In contrast, the classification accuracy for TGI-Cool (0.72±0.03) did not differ statistically from TGI-Warm (0.73±0.01) in subjects without illusion. We found that the TGI and Cool stimuli were classified better than the TGI and Warm stimuli, implying that objective EEG features are consistent with subjective behavioral results. Further, we observed that most discriminative features between the TGI and the Cool or Warm conditions appeared in the parietal area for subjects who perceived the illusion. We postulate that the somato-sensory cortex may be activated when TGI is perceived to be hot pain.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pain in Persons with Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12030300. [PMID: 35326257 PMCID: PMC8946117 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12030300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain and suffering in persons with disorders of consciousness (DoC) remain poorly understood, frequently unaddressed or inadequately addressed, and controversial on numerous levels. This narrative literature review will address a number of critical issues germane to pain and suffering in this challenging group of patients, providing an introductory overview of the topic, perspectives on current knowledge regarding pain pathoanatomy and pathophysiology, and a review of common pain generators and factors that can lead to the chronifcation of pain. Caveats on bedside pain assessment challenges, as well as electrophysiologic and neuroimaging findings in these patients, will also be explored. Pain management techniques, including non-pharmacological and pharmacological, will be reviewed. Ethical considerations in the context of pain and suffering in persons with disorders of consciousness will round out the review prior to our concluding comments.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cortese MD, Arcuri F, Nemirovsky IE, Lucca LF, Tonin P, Soddu A, Riganello F. Nociceptive Response Is a Possible Marker of Evolution in the Level of Consciousness in Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome Patients. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:771505. [PMID: 34975378 PMCID: PMC8714733 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.771505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Nociception Coma Scale (NCS) and its revised version (NCS-R) were used to evaluate behavioral responses to pain in non-communicative patients. We hypothesized that if patients demonstrate changes to their NCS(-R) scores over time, their evolving behavioral abilities could indicate a forthcoming diagnostic improvement with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Forty-three Vegetative State/Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (VS/UWS) patients were enrolled in the study. The patients were assessed weekly using the CRS-R and NCS(-R) for four consecutive weeks. The first assessment was within 10 days after hospitalization. The assessments were performed between 09:30 and 11:30 AM in a room with constant levels of humidity, light and temperature, as well as an absence of transient noise. Noxious stimuli were administered using a Newton-meter, with pressure applied to the fingernail bed for a maximum of 5 s unless interrupted by a behavioral response from subjects. Seventeen patients demonstrated improvements in their level of consciousness, 13 of whom showed significant behavioral changes through the NCS(-R) before being diagnosed with a Minimally Conscious State (MCS) according to the CRS-R. The behavioral changes observed using the NCS(-R) corresponded to a high probability of observing an improvement from VS/UWS to MCS. To characterize the increased likelihood of this transition, our results present threshold scores of ≥5 for the NCS (accuracy 86%, sensitivity 87%, and specificity 86%) and ≥3 for the NCS-R (accuracy 77%, sensitivity 89%, and specificity 73%). In conclusion, a careful evaluation of responses to nociceptive stimuli in DOC patients could constitute an effective procedure in assessing their evolving conscious state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Daniela Cortese
- Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation (RAN), S. Anna Institute, Via Siris, Crotone, Italy
| | - Francesco Arcuri
- Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation (RAN), S. Anna Institute, Via Siris, Crotone, Italy
| | - Idan E. Nemirovsky
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Lucia Francesca Lucca
- Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation (RAN), S. Anna Institute, Via Siris, Crotone, Italy
| | - Paolo Tonin
- Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation (RAN), S. Anna Institute, Via Siris, Crotone, Italy
| | - Andrea Soddu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Francesco Riganello
- Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation (RAN), S. Anna Institute, Via Siris, Crotone, Italy
- *Correspondence: Francesco Riganello,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pain Perception in Disorder of Consciousness: A Scoping Review on Current Knowledge, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspective. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11050665. [PMID: 34065349 PMCID: PMC8161058 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11050665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain perception in individuals with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) is still a matter of debate. Advanced neuroimaging studies suggest some cortical activations even in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) compared to those with a minimally conscious state (MCS). Therefore, pain perception has to be considered even in individuals with UWS. However, advanced neuroimaging assessment can be challenging to conduct, and its findings are sometimes difficult to be interpreted. Conversely, multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) can be carried out quickly and are more adaptable to the clinical needs. In this scoping review, we dealt with the neurophysiological basis underpinning pain in PDOC, pointing out how pain perception assessment in these individuals might help in reducing the misdiagnosis rate. The available literature data suggest that patients with UWS show a more severe functional connectivity breakdown among the pain-related brain areas compared to individuals in MCS, pointing out that pain perception increases with the level of consciousness. However, there are noteworthy exceptions, because some UWS patients show pain-related cortical activations that partially overlap those observed in MCS individuals. This suggests that some patients with UWS may have residual brain functional connectivity supporting the somatosensory, affective, and cognitive aspects of pain processing (i.e., a conscious experience of the unpleasantness of pain), rather than only being able to show autonomic responses to potentially harmful stimuli. Therefore, the significance of the neurophysiological approach to pain perception in PDOC seems to be clear, and despite some methodological caveats (including intensity of stimulation, multimodal paradigms, and active vs. passive stimulation protocols), remain to be solved. To summarize, an accurate clinical and neurophysiological assessment should always be performed for a better understanding of pain perception neurophysiological underpinnings, a more precise differential diagnosis at the level of individual cases as well as group comparisons, and patient-tailored management.
Collapse
|