Monitoring Tacrolimus Concentrations in Whole Blood and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells: Inter- and Intra-Patient Variability in a Cohort of Pediatric Patients

Intracellular tacrolimus concentration correlates with impaired renal function through regulation of the IS-AHR-ABC transporter in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

BACKGROUNDS

Tacrolimus (TAC) concentration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is regarded as a better predictor of its immunosuppressive effect than the TAC concentration in whole blood. However, whether the exposure of TAC in PBMCs or WB was altered in post-transplant recipients with renal impairment remains unclear.

METHODS

We investigated the relationship of trough TAC concentration in WB and PBMCs with renal functions in post-transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetic profiles of TAC in PBMCs and WB in the two chronic kidney disease (CKD) rat models were examined using UPLC-MS/MS. Western blotting and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) were used to analyze the expression of proteins and mRNAs related to TAC metabolism and transport, respectively. In addition, the effects of uremic toxins on human PBMCs were investigated using whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA sequencing [RNA-seq]).

RESULTS

We observed a decrease in the trough TAC concentration in PBMCs in the recipients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 90 mL/min, compared with those of recipients with eGFR > 90 mL/min, but there was no difference in blood based on TAC concentrations (C0Blood). In a 150-patient post-transplant cohort, no significant relationship was observed between PBMCs and WB concentrations of TAC, and the eGFR value was correlated with TAC C0PBMCs but not with TAC C0Blood. In two CKD rat models, the TAC pharmacokinetic profile in the PBMCs was significantly lower than that in the control group; however, the blood TAC pharmacokinetic profiles in the two groups were similar. Transcriptome results showed that co-incubation of human PBMCs with uremic toxins upregulated the expression of AHR, ABCB1, and ABCC2. Compared to control rats, plasma IS increased by 1.93- and 2.26-fold and the expression of AHR, P-gp, and MRP2 in PBMCs was higher in AD and 5/6 nephrectomy (NX) rats, without modifying the expression of other proteins related to TAC exposure.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of TAC in PBMCs changed with a decline in renal function. Uremic toxins accumulate during renal insufficiency, which activates AHR, upregulates the expression of P-gp and MRP2, and affects their intracellular concentrations. Our findings suggest that monitoring TAC concentrations in PBMCs is more important than monitoring WB concentrations in post-transplant recipients with renal impairment.

Importance of Pharmacogenetics and Drug-Drug Interactions in a Kidney Transplanted Patient

Tacrolimus (TAC) is a narrow-therapeutic-range immunosuppressant drug used after organ transplantation. A therapeutic failure is possible if drug levels are not within the therapeutic range after the first year of treatment. Pharmacogenetic variants and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are involved. We describe a patient case of a young man (16 years old) with a renal transplant receiving therapy including TAC, mycophenolic acid (MFA), prednisone and omeprazole for prophylaxis of gastric and duodenal ulceration. The patient showed great fluctuation in TAC blood concentration/oral dose ratio, as well as pharmacotherapy adverse effects (AEs) and frequent diarrhea episodes. Additionally, decreased kidney function was found. A pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, including pharmacogenetic analysis, was carried out. The selection of the genes studied was based on the previous literature (CYP3A5, CYP3A4, POR, ABCB1, PXR and CYP2C19). A drug interaction with omeprazole was reported and the nephrologist switched to rabeprazole. A lower TAC concentration/dose ratio was achieved, and the patient's condition improved. In addition, the TTT haplotype of ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) and Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) gene variants seemed to affect TAC pharmacotherapy in the studied patient and could explain the occurrence of long-term adverse effects post-transplantation. These findings suggest that polymorphic variants and co-treatments must be considered in order to achieve the effectiveness of the immunosuppressive therapy with TAC, especially when polymedicated patients are involved. Moreover, pharmacogenetics could influence the drug concentration at the cellular level, both in lymphocyte and in renal tissue, and should be explored in future studies.

Factors Affecting Day-to-Day Variations in Tacrolimus Concentration among Children and Young Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Tacrolimus is widely used as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It has a narrow therapeutic index range; high tacrolimus concentrations are associated with toxicity, whereas low concentrations are associated with an increased risk of GVHD. Although dose adjustments based on therapeutic drug monitoring are performed, unexpected large variations in tacrolimus concentration are sometimes encountered. The available evidence suggests that the factors affecting tacrolimus concentration are not fully understood. This study was aimed primarily at investigating the factors affecting day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration in children and young adults who received continuous tacrolimus infusion after allo-HSCT. The secondary objective was to identify the factors causing large variations (>20%) in tacrolimus concentrations. This retrospective cohort study comprised 123 consecutive pediatric and young adult patients (age <25 years) who received continuous i.v. tacrolimus infusion after allo-HSCT at Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan, between January 2009 and December 2021. To compare day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration without consideration of the tacrolimus dose, 2 consecutive days when the tacrolimus dose was not changed were selected from between the first post-allo-HSCT day of a tacrolimus concentration >7 ng/mL and day 28 post-allo-HSCT. Subsequently, information for the subsequent 24 hours was collected along with the tacrolimus concentrations and hematocrit values. Tacrolimus concentration was determined using whole blood samples. Tacrolimus concentrations were significantly higher in patients who received red blood cell concentrate (RCC) transfusions (P < .0001) and methotrexate (P = .0162), patients with persistent fever (P = .0056), and patients with a decline in fever (P = .0003). In contrast, tacrolimus concentrations were significantly lower in patients who received platelet concentrate (PC) transfusions (P < .0001), who redeveloped fever (P = .0261), and who had a replaced tacrolimus administration route set (P = .0008). Variations in tacrolimus concentration were significantly correlated with variations in hematocrit (r = .556; P < .0001). Body weight (P < .0001), RCC transfusion (P < .0001), methotrexate use (P = .0333), persistent fever (P = .0150), and decline in fever (P = .0073) were associated with a sharp increase in tacrolimus concentration. In contrast, body weight (P < .0001), PC transfusion (P = .0025), and replacement of the tacrolimus administration route set (P = .0025) were associated with a sharp decrease in tacrolimus concentration. RCC and PC transfusions, fever, methotrexate administration, and replacement of the tacrolimus administration route set were independent factors affecting day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration. In addition to these factors, low body weight was a risk factor for both sharp increases and decreases in tacrolimus concentration. These findings suggest the need for better control of tacrolimus concentration using whole blood samples.

Insights into the Pharmacogenetics of Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

The influence of pharmacogenetics in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics needs further investigation, considering its potential in assisting clinicians to predict the optimal starting dosage and the need for a personalized adjustment of the dose, as well as to identify patients at a high risk of rejection, drug-related adverse effects, or poor outcomes. In the past decade, new pharmacokinetic strategies have been developed to improve personalized tacrolimus treatment. Several studies have shown that patients with tacrolimus doses C0/D < 1 ng/mL/mg may demonstrate a greater incidence of drug-related adverse events and infections. In addition, C0 tacrolimus intrapatient variability (IPV) has been identified as a potential biomarker to predict poor outcomes related to drug over- and under-exposure. With regard to tacrolimus pharmacodynamics, inconsistent genotype-phenotype relationships have been identified. The aim of this review is to provide a concise summary of currently available data regarding the influence of pharmacogenetics on the clinical outcome of patients with high intrapatient variability and/or a fast metabolizer phenotype. Moreover, the role of membrane transporters in the interindividual variability of responses to tacrolimus is critically discussed from a transporter scientist’s perspective. Indeed, the relationship between transporter polymorphisms and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations will help to elucidate the interplay between the biological mechanisms underlying genetic variations impacting drug concentrations and clinical effects.