Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Based Breakpoints of Polymyxin B for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

Three methods to optimise polymyxin B dosing using estimated AUC after first dose: validation with the data generated by Monte Carlo simulation

To achieve the AUC-guided dosing, we proposed three methods to estimate polymyxin B AUC across 24 h at steady state (AUCSS,24h) using limited concentrations after its first dose.Monte Carlo simulation based on a well-established population PK model was performed to generate the PK profiles of 1000 patients with normal or abnormal renal function. Polymyxin B AUCSS,24h was estimated for each subject using three methods (two-point PK approach, three-point PK approach, and four-point PK approach) based on limited concentration data in its first dose and compared with the actual AUC at steady state calculated using the linear-trapezoidal formula.In patients with normal renal function, the mean bias of two-point PK approach, three-point PK approach, and four-point PK approach was -8.73%, 1.37%, and -0.48%, respectively. The corresponding value was -11.15%, 1.99%, and -0.28% in patients with renal impairment, respectively. The largest mean bias of two-point PK approach, three-point PK approach, and four-point PK approach was -12.63%, -6.47%, and -0.54% when the sampling time shifted.The Excel calculators designed based on the three methods can be potentially used to optimise the dosing regimen of polymyxin B in the clinic.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Using Polymyxin B Free Plasma Concentrations From Published Reports and Evaluation of Dosage Regimens Based on Monte Carlo Simulation in Critically Ill Patients

A population pharmacokinetic (pop PK) model of polymyxin B was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects (NONMEM) modeling based on free plasma concentrations to determine whether dose adjustment is required in critically ill patients. One thousand pharmacokinetic profiles for virtual patients with a body weight of 70 kg were simulated using Monte Carlo simulation at different dose scenarios, and area under the concentration-time curve of free drug (fAUC) was computed. The probability of target attainment (PTA) at each minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was calculated using fAUC/MIC as a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index. The final population PK model was a 2-compartment model. PTA showed that 3.5 mg/kg/day regimens of polymyxin B effectively achieved the fAUC/MIC target of 10 (one log10 kill) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains with MIC of 1 mg/L or less (PTA,  90.7% or greater), while the dose regimen were ineffective against strains with an MIC of 2 mg/L or greater (PTA, 56.9% or less). For Klebsiella pneumoniae, the fAUC/MIC target of 17.4 (one log10 kill) was achieved in more than 90.4% of cases for MIC of 0.5 mg/L or less with 3 mg/kg/day regimens. However, the PTA decreased dramatically as MICs increased above 1 mg/L (PTA, 56.1% or less). The polymyxin B dosage regimen of 3.5 mg/kg/day and 3 mg/kg/day are sufficient to treat P. aeruginosa infections with an MIC of 1 mg/L or less and K. pneumoniae infections with an MIC of 0.5 mg/L or less, respectively. The current recommended dose (1.5-3 mg/kg/day) of polymyxin B appears inadequate to attain the PK/PD target for therapeutic efficacy against infections caused by P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae isolates when MIC is above the values.

Evaluation of polymyxin B AUC/MIC ratio for dose optimization in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection

Polymyxin B has been used as a last-line therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infection. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index (AUC/MIC) of polymyxin B has not been clinically evaluated, given that the broth microdilution method for polymyxin susceptibility testing is rarely used in hospitals. This study analyzed data from 77 patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. Among the samples, 63 K. pneumoniae isolates had MIC values of 1.0 mg/L as measured by broth microdilution but 0.5 mg/L as measured using the Vitek 2 system. Polymyxin B AUC/MIC was significantly associated with clinical response (p = 0.002) but not with 30-day all-cause mortality (p = 0.054). With a target AUC/MIC value of 50, Monte Carlo simulations showed that a fixed dose of 100 mg/12 h and three weight-based regimens (1.25 mg/kg/12 h for 80 kg and 1.5 mg/kg/12 h for 70 kg/80 kg) achieved a cumulative fraction of response >90% regardless of renal function, but the risk of nephrotoxicity was high. For patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections, the underestimation of polymyxin resistance in automated systems need to be taken into account when optimizing polymyxin B dosing based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles.

Polymyxin combination therapy for multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug resistant, and difficult-to-treat drug-resistant gram-negative infections: is it superior to polymyxin monotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively-drug resistant (XDR) or difficult-to-treat drug resistant (DTR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, and Escherichia coli poses a severe challenge.

AREAS COVERED

The rapid growing of multi-resistant GNB as well as the considerable deceleration in development of new anti-infective agents have made polymyxins (e.g. polymyxin B and colistin) a mainstay in clinical practices as either monotherapy or combination therapy. However, whether the polymyxin-based combinations lead to better outcomes remains unknown. This review mainly focuses on the effect of polymyxin combination therapy versus monotherapy on treating GNB-related infections. We also provide several factors in designing studies and their impact on optimizing polymyxin combinations.

EXPERT OPINION

An abundance of recent in vitro and preclinical in vivo data suggest clinical benefit for polymyxin-drug combination therapies, especially colistin plus meropenem and colistin plus rifampicin, with synergistic killing against MDR, XDR, and DTR P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. The beneficial effects of polymyxin-drug combinations (e.g. colistin or polymyxin B + carbapenem against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, polymyxin B + carbapenem + rifampin against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, and colistin + ceftolozan/tazobactam + rifampin against PDR-P. aeruginosa) have often been shown in clinical setting by retrospective studies. However, high-certainty evidence from large randomized controlled trials is necessary. These clinical trials should incorporate careful attention to patient's sample size, characteristics of patient's groups, PK/PD relationships and dosing, rapid detection of resistance, MIC determinations, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of polymyxin B in patients with bloodstream infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Introduction: Polymyxin B is a last-line therapy for carbapenem-resistant microorganisms. However, a lack of clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data has substantially hindered dose optimization and breakpoint setting. Methods: A prospective, multi-center clinical trial was undertaken with polymyxin B [2.5 mg/kg loading dose (3-h infusion), 1.25 mg/kg/12 h maintenance dose (2-h infusion)] for treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) bloodstream infections (BSI). Safety, clinical and microbiological efficacy were evaluated. A validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was applied to determine the concentrations of polymyxin B in blood samples. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to examine the susceptibility breakpoint for polymyxin B against BSI caused by CRKP. Results: Nine patients were enrolled and evaluated for safety. Neurotoxicity (5/9), nephrotoxicity (5/9), and hyperpigmentation (1/9) were recorded. Blood cultures were negative within 3 days of commencing therapy in all 8 patients evaluated for microbiological efficacy, and clinical cure or improvement occurred in 6 of 8 patients. C_max and C_min following the loading dose were 5.53 ± 1.80 and 1.62 ± 0.41 mg/L, respectively. With maintenance dosing, AUC_ss,24 h was 79.6 ± 25.0 mg h/L and C_ss,avg 3.35 ± 1.06 mg/L. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that a 1 mg/kg/12-hourly maintenance dose could achieve >90% probability of target attainment (PTA) for isolates with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤1 mg/L. PTA dropped substantially for MICs ≥2 mg/L, even with a maximally recommended daily dose of 1.5 mg/kg/12-hourly. Conclusion: This is the first clinical PK/PD study evaluating polymyxin B for BSI. These results will assist to optimize polymyxin B therapy and establish its breakpoints for CRKP BSI.

Low-dose intravenous plus inhaled versus intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of extensive drug-resistant Gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critical illnesses: a multi-center matched case-control study

Background

The mortality of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative (XDR GN) bacilli-induced ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is extremely high. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled (IH) plus intravenous (IV) polymyxin B versus IV polymyxin B in XDR GN bacilli VAP patients.

Methods

A retrospective multi-center observational cohort study was performed at eight ICUs between January 1^st 2018, and January 1^st 2020 in China. Data from all patients treated with polymyxin B for a microbiologically confirmed VAP were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure of VAP. The favorable clinical outcome, microbiological outcome, VAP-related mortality and all-cause mortality during hospitalization, and side effects related with polymyxin B were secondary endpoints. Favorable clinical outcome included clinical cure or clinical improvement.

Results

151 patients and 46 patients were treated with IV polymyxin B and IH plus IV polymyxin B, respectively. XDR Klebsiella pneumoniae was the main isolated pathogen (n = 83, 42.1%). After matching on age (± 5 years), gender, septic shock, and Apache II score (± 4 points) when polymyxin B was started, 132 patients were included. 44 patients received simultaneous IH plus IV polymyxin B and 88 patients received IV polymyxin B. The rates of clinical cure (43.2% vs 27.3%, p = 0.066), bacterial eradication (36.4% vs 23.9%, p = 0.132) as well as VAP-related mortality (27.3% vs 34.1%, p = 0.428), all-cause mortality (34.1% vs 42.0%, p = 0.378) did not show any significant difference between the two groups. However, IH plus IV polymyxin B therapy was associated with improved favorable clinical outcome (77.3% vs 58.0%, p = 0.029). Patients in the different subgroups (admitted with medical etiology, infected with XDR K. pneumoniae, without bacteremia, with immunosuppressive status) were with odd ratios (ORs) in favor of the combined therapy. No patient required polymyxin B discontinuation due to adverse events. Additional use of IH polymyxin B (aOR 2.63, 95% CI 1.06, 6.66, p = 0.037) was an independent factor associated with favorable clinical outcome.

Conclusions

The addition of low-dose IH polymyxin B to low-dose IV polymyxin B did not provide efficient clinical cure and bacterial eradication in VAP caused by XDR GN bacilli.

Keypoints

Additional use of IH polymyxin B was the sole independent risk factor of favorable clinical outcome. Patients in the different subgroups were with HRs substantially favoring additional use of IH polymyxin B. No patients required polymyxin B discontinuation due to adverse events.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-01033-5.

Atomic-Resolution Structures and Mode of Action of Clinically Relevant Antimicrobial Peptides

Global rise of infections and deaths caused by drug-resistant bacterial pathogens are among the unmet medical needs. In an age of drying pipeline of novel antibiotics to treat bacterial infections, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are proven to be valid therapeutics modalities. Direct in vivo applications of many AMPs could be challenging; however, works are demonstrating encouraging results for some of them. In this review article, we discussed 3-D structures of potent AMPs e.g., polymyxin, thanatin, MSI, protegrin, OMPTA in complex with bacterial targets and their mode of actions. Studies on human peptide LL37 and de novo-designed peptides are also discussed. We have focused on AMPs which are effective against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Since treatment options for the infections caused by super bugs of Gram-negative bacteria are now extremely limited. We also summarize some of the pertinent challenges in the field of clinical trials of AMPs.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of peptide antibiotics

Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health challenge. As few new efficacious antibiotics will become available in the near future, peptide antibiotics continue to be major therapeutic options for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Rational use of antibiotics requires optimisation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the treatment of different types of infections. Toxicodynamics must also be considered to improve the safety of antibiotic use and, where appropriate, to guide therapeutic drug monitoring. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics/toxicodynamics of peptide antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Optimising antibiotic exposure at the infection site is essential for improving their efficacy and minimising emergence of resistance.

Polymyxin B Combined with Minocycline: A Potentially Effective Combination against blaOXA-23-harboring CRAB in In Vitro PK/PD Model

Polymyxin-based combination therapy is commonly used to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections. In the present study, the bactericidal effect of polymyxin B and minocycline combination was tested in three CRAB strains containing bla_OXA-23 by the checkerboard assay and in vitro dynamic pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) model. The combination showed synergistic or partial synergistic effect (fractional inhibitory concentration index ≤0.56) on the tested strains in checkboard assays. The antibacterial activity was enhanced in the combination group compared with either monotherapy in in vitro PK/PD model. The combination regimen (simultaneous infusion of 0.75 mg/kg polymyxin B and 100 mg minocycline via 2 h infusion) reduced bacterial colony counts by 0.9–3.5 log₁₀ colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) compared with either drug alone at 24 h. In conclusion, 0.75 mg/kg polymyxin B combined with 100 mg minocycline via 2 h infusion could be a promising treatment option for CRAB bloodstream infections.