Differential Effects of Treatment Strategies in Individuals With Chronic Ocular Surface Pain With a Neuropathic Component

Corneal neuropathic pain: a review to inform clinical practice

Corneal neuropathic pain (CNP) is a poorly defined disease entity characterised by an aberrant pain response to normally non-painful stimuli and categorised into having peripheral and central mechanisms, with the former responding to instillation of topical anaesthetic. CNP is a challenging condition to diagnose due to numerous aetiologies, an absence of clinical signs and ancillary tests (in vivo confocal microscopy and esthesiometry), lacking the ability to confirm the diagnosis and having limited availability. Symptomatology maybe mirrored by severe and chronic forms of dry eye disease (DED), often leading to misdiagnosis and inadequate treatment. In practice, patients with suspected CNP can be assessed with questionnaires to elicit symptoms. A thorough ocular assessment is also performed to exclude any co-existent ocular conditions. A medical and mental health history should be sought due to associations with autoimmune disease, chronic pain syndromes, anxiety and depression. Management begins with communicating to the patient the nature of their condition. Ophthalmologists can prescribe topical therapies such as autologous serum eyedrops to optimise the ocular surface and promote neural regeneration. However, a multi-disciplinary treatment approach is often required, including mental health support, particularly when there are central mechanisms. General practitioners, pain specialists, neurologists and psychologists may be needed to assist with oral and behavioural therapies. Less data is available to support the safety and efficacy of adjuvant and surgical therapies and the long-term natural history remains to be determined. Hence clinical trials and registry studies are urgently needed to fill these data gaps with the aim to improve patient care.

Genome Wide Association Study of Neuropathic Ocular Pain

Purpose

To conduct a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of individuals with neuropathic ocular pain (NOP) symptoms to identify genomic variants that may predispose to NOP development.

Design

Prospective study of individuals with NOP.

Participants

Three hundred twenty-nine patients recruited from the Miami Veterans Affairs eye clinic.

Methods

The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory modified for the eye (NPSI-Eye) was completed to calculate a NPSI-Eye-Sub-Score (summed ratings of burning and wind sensitivity) as an indicator of NOP severity. A GWAS was performed for the NPSI-Eye-Sub-Score with a significance threshold of P < 5 × 10-8. A gene-based analysis was performed using the multimarker analysis of genomic annotation software (in the functional mapping and annotation of GWAS online platform). The 13 865 778 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from our GWAS analysis were mapped to 10 834 protein coding genes, and significant genes were run through gene set enrichment analysis.

Main Outcome Measures

Identification of SNPs and protein products that may be associated with the development of NOP.

Results

One hundred seventy-one SNPs reached a threshold of P < 10-5, of which 10 SNPs reached the suggestive level of significance of P < 5 × 10-7 and 1 SNP met our genome-wide significance threshold of P < 5 × 10-8. This lead SNP, rs140293404 (P = 1.23 × 10-8), is an intronic variant found within gene ENSG00000287251 coding for transcript ENST00000662732.1. Rs140293404 is in linkage disequilibrium with exon variant rs7926353 (r2 > 0.8) within ENSG00000279046 coding for transcript ENST00000624288.1. The most significant genes from gene-based tests were matrix metalloproteinase-19 (MMP19) (P = 1.12 × 10-5), zinc finger RNA-binding motif and serine/arginine rich-1 (ZRSR1) (P = 1.48 × 10-4), CTC-487M23.8 (P = 1.79 × 10-4), receptor expression-enhancing protein-5 (REEP5) (P = 2.36 × 10-4), and signal recognition particle-19 (SRP19) (P = 2.56 × 10-4). From gene set enrichment analysis, the sensory perception (false discovery rate = 6.57 × 10-3) and olfactory signaling (false discovery rate = 1.63 × 10-2) pathways were enriched with the most significant genes.

Conclusions

Our GWAS revealed genes with protein products that may impact sensory perception, lending biological plausibility to a role for SNPs identified by our GWAS in the development of NOP. A better understanding of the biological relevance of these genes and pathways in the pathophysiology associated with NOP may facilitate future novel mechanism-based treatments.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Coexistence of neuropathic corneal pain, corneal nerve abnormalities, depression, and low quality of life

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality of life (QoL), mental health conditions and corneal morphology in neuropathic corneal pain (NCP) subjects without a significant ocular surface disease.

METHODS

A composite questionnaire was administered to 228 consecutive subjects, assessing the pain intensity, duration, and quality using a modified version of the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) and Pain Detect (PD) questionnaires. Subjects diagnosed with possible central NCP and two sub-groups of patients diagnosed with peripheral ocular pain completed an additional battery of mental health questionnaires and were examined by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy (IVCM).

RESULTS

Of the 76 subjects that reported chronic ocular pain (duration >1 month), 53 were classified with probable NCP. Nine subjects without signs that justify the pain and non-responding to topical anaesthesia, were considered affected by central NCP. In these patients, a significant negative correlation was found between the presence pain and the mental component of the QoL (R2 = 0.733), and a positive correlation between the severity of pain the presence post-traumatic stress disorder (R2 = 0.83) and depression (R2 = 0.93). Although neuromas and sprouting had higher frequency in the central NCP group compared the control groups, these differences was not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of ocular pain characteristics using multiple questionnaires and IVCM may help to recognize differences between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. An association between pain intensity and mental health condition may guide the therapeutical choices.

Ocular surface itch and pain: key differences and similarities between the two sensations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the pathophysiology and treatment of ocular itch and pain, encompassing nociceptive and neuropathic categories.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ocular itch and pain are sensations that arise from activation of ocular surface polymodal nerves. Nociceptive itch, commonly comorbid with ocular pain complaints, is mainly driven by a histamine-mediated type 1 hypersensitivity reaction. Beyond topical therapy, novel drug delivery systems are being explored to improve ocular residence time of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antihistamines. Nociceptive ocular pain can be driven by a variety of factors. Treatment focuses on addressing the causative sources of pain. Neuropathic ocular itch and pain are driven by nerve damage and dysfunction and as such, topical and oral neuromodulation have been explored as treatments. Oral neuromodulators include alpha 2 delta ligands, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and low dose naltrexone. Novel therapies are being evaluated for both modalities such as difelikefalin (κ-opioid receptor agonist) for neuropathic itch and libvatrep (transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist) for neuropathic pain.

SUMMARY

Both ocular itch and pain can be driven by nociceptive and/or neuropathic mechanisms. Identifying contributors to abnormal ocular sensations is vital for precise medical care. Novel therapeutics for these conditions aim to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Ocular Pain after Refractive Surgery: Interim Analysis of Frequency and Risk Factors

PURPOSE

To examine the frequency and risk factors for ocular pain after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

DESIGN

Prospective study of individuals undergoing refractive surgery at 2 different centers.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred nine individuals undergoing refractive surgery: 87% LASIK and 13% PRK.

METHODS

Participants rated ocular pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 before surgery and 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. A clinical examination focused on ocular surface health was performed 3 and 6 months after surgery. Persistent ocular pain was defined as an NRS score of 3 or more at both 3 and 6 months after surgery (patients), and this group was compared with individuals with NRS scores of < 3 at both time points (control participants).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Individuals with persistent ocular pain after refractive surgery.

RESULTS

The 109 patients who underwent refractive surgery were followed up for 6 months after surgery. Mean age was 34 ± 8 years (range, 23-57 years); 62% self-identified as female, 81% as White, and 33% as Hispanic. Eight patients (7%) reported ocular pain (NRS score ≥ 3) before surgery, with the frequency of ocular pain increasing after surgery to 23% (n = 25) at 3 months and 24% (n = 26) at 6 months. Twelve patients (11%) reported an NRS score of 3 or more at both time points and constituted the persistent pain group. Factors that predicted persistent pain after surgery in a multivariable analysis were (1) ocular pain before surgery predicated persistent pain after surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.31), (2) symptom report of depression before surgery (Patient Health Questionnaire-9: OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = 0.01), (3) use of an oral antiallergy medication before surgery (OR, 13.6; 95% CI, 2.1-89.3; P = 0.007), and (4) pain intensity day 1 after surgery (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; P = 0.005). There were no significant associations between ocular surface signs of tear dysfunction and ocular pain, P > 0.05 for all ocular surface signs. Most individuals (> 90%) were completely or somewhat satisfied with their vision at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Eleven percent of individuals reported persistent ocular pain after refractive surgery, with several preoperative and perioperative factors predicting pain after surgery.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Botulinum toxin A decreases neural activity in pain-related brain regions in individuals with chronic ocular pain and photophobia

Introduction

To examine the effect of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) on neural mechanisms underlying pain and photophobia using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in individuals with chronic ocular pain.

Methods

Twelve subjects with chronic ocular pain and light sensitivity were recruited from the Miami Veterans Affairs eye clinic. Inclusion criteria were: (1) chronic ocular pain; (2) presence of ocular pain over 1 week recall; and (3) presence of photophobia. All individuals underwent an ocular surface examination to capture tear parameters before and 4-6 weeks after BoNT-A injections. Using an event-related fMRI design, subjects were presented with light stimuli during two fMRI scans, once before and 4-6 weeks after BoNT-A injection. Light evoked unpleasantness ratings were reported by subjects after each scan. Whole brain blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) responses to light stimuli were analyzed.

Results

At baseline, all subjects reported unpleasantness with light stimulation (average: 70.8 ± 32.0). Four to six weeks after BoNT-A injection, unpleasantness scores decreased (48.1 ± 33.6), but the change was not significant. On an individual level, 50% of subjects had decreased unpleasantness ratings in response to light stimulation compared to baseline ("responders," n = 6), while 50% had equivalent (n = 3) or increased (n = 3) unpleasantness ("non-responders"). At baseline, several differences were noted between responders and non-responders; responders had higher baseline unpleasantness ratings to light, higher symptoms of depression, and more frequent use of antidepressants and anxiolytics, compared to non-responders. Group analysis at baseline displayed light-evoked BOLD responses in bilateral primary somatosensory (S1), bilateral secondary somatosensory (S2), bilateral anterior insula, paracingulate gyrus, midcingulate cortex (MCC), bilateral frontal pole, bilateral cerebellar hemispheric lobule VI, vermis, bilateral cerebellar crus I and II, and visual cortices. BoNT-A injections significantly decreased light evoked BOLD responses in bilateral S1, S2 cortices, cerebellar hemispheric lobule VI, cerebellar crus I, and left cerebellar crus II. BoNT-A responders displayed activation of the spinal trigeminal nucleus at baseline where non-responders did not.

Discussion

BoNT-A injections modulate light-evoked activation of pain-related brain systems and photophobia symptoms in some individuals with chronic ocular pain. These effects are associated with decreased activation in areas responsible for processing the sensory-discriminative, affective, dimensions, and motor responses to pain.

Novel Treatments for Chronic Ocular Surface Pain

ABSTRACT

Several etiologies can contribute to ocular surface pain including nociceptive, peripheral neuropathic, and central neuropathic mechanisms. Clinical clues can help identify contributors to ocular surface pain in a patient. In individuals whose pain persists despite targeting nociceptive contributors, neuropathic mechanisms should be considered and addressed using oral, topical, and/or adjuvant agents.

Understanding chronic ocular surface pain: An unmet need for targeted drug therapy

Chronic ocular surface pain (COSP) may be defined as a feeling of pain, perceived as originating from the ocular surface, that persists for >3 months. COSP is a complex multifactorial condition associated with several risk factors that may significantly interfere with an individual's daily activities, resulting in poor quality of life (QoL). COSP is also likely to have a high burden on patients with substantial implications on global healthcare costs. While patients may use varied terminology to describe symptoms of COSP, any ocular surface damage in the ocular sensory apparatus (nociceptive, neuropathic, inflammatory, or combination thereof) resulting in low tear production, chronic inflammation, or nerve abnormalities (functional and/or morphological), is typically associated with COSP. Considering the heterogeneity of this condition, it is highly recommended that advanced multimodal diagnostic tools are utilized to help discern the nociceptive and neuropathic pain pathways in order to provide targeted treatment and effective clinical management. The current article provides an overview of COSP, including its multifactorial pathophysiology, etiology, prevalence, clinical presentation, impact on QoL, diagnosis, current management, and unmet medical needs.

Neuropathic ocular surface pain: Emerging drug targets and therapeutic implications

INTRODUCTION

Dysfunction at various levels of the somatosensory system can lead to ocular surface pain with a neuropathic component. Compared to nociceptive pain (due to noxious stimuli at the ocular surface), neuropathic pain tends to be chronic and refractory to therapies, making it an important source of morbidity in the population. An understanding of the options available for neuropathic ocular surface pain, including new and emerging therapies, is thus an important topic.

AREAS COVERED

This review will examine studies focusing on ocular surface pain, emphasizing those examining patients with a neuropathic component. Attention will be placed toward recent (after 2017) studies that have examined new and emerging therapies for neuropathic ocular surface pain.

EXPERT OPINION

Several therapies have been studied thus far, and continued research is needed to identify which individuals would benefit from specific therapies. Gaps in our understanding exist, especially with availability of in-clinic diagnostics for neuropathic pain. A focus on improving diagnostic capabilities and researching gene-modulating therapies could help us to provide more specific mechanism-based therapies for patients. In the meantime, continuing to uncover new modalities and examining which are likely to work depending on pain phenotype remains an important short-term goal.