SHR2285, the first selectively oral FXIa inhibitor in China: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics combined with aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Factor XIa Inhibitors in Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite preventive measures, stroke rates remain high in the primary and secondary prevention settings. Factor XIa inhibition may offer a novel, safe and effective antithrombotic option for stroke prevention.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including all available randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy and safety of factor XIa inhibitors versus controls in primary or secondary stroke prevention. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were symptomatic ischemic stroke (IS) and the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding.

RESULTS

Four phase II dose-finding RCTs were included, comprising a total of 4732 patients treated with factor XIa inhibitors versus 1798 controls. Treatment with factor XIa inhibitors did not reduce the risk of IS compared to controls (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.67-1.17). The composite of symptomatic IS and covert infarcts on brain MRI (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87-1.18), the composite of symptomatic IS and transient ischemic attack (TIA; RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-1.01), and the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.87-1.31) did not differ between the treatment groups. Treatment with factor XIa inhibitors did not increase the risk of the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.65-2.16), major bleeding alone (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.64-2.22), intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.26-3.19) or all-cause mortality (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.77-1.90).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides reassuring evidence regarding the safety of factor XIa inhibitors. These findings, coupled with potential signals of efficacy in reducing IS (and TIA), underscore the importance of ongoing phase III RCTs for providing definitive data regarding the effect of factor XIa inhibition on stroke prevention.

Determination of the Potential Clinical Benefits of Small Molecule Factor XIa Inhibitors in Arterial Thrombosis

Anticoagulants are the mainstay for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. However, bleeding complications remain a primary concern. Recent advances in understanding the contribution of activated factor XI (FXIa) in arterial thrombosis with a limited impact on hemostasis have led to the development of several FXIa-targeting modalities. Injectable agents including monoclonal antibodies and antisense oligonucleotides against FXIa have been primarily studied in venous thrombosis. The orally active small molecules that specifically inhibit the active site of FXIa are currently being investigated for their antithrombotic activity in both arteries and veins. This review focuses on a discussion of the potential clinical benefits of small molecule FXIa inhibitors, mainly asundexian and milvexian, in arterial thrombosis based on their pharmacological profiles and the compelling results of phase 2 clinical studies. The preclinical and epidemiological basis for the impact of FXIa in hemostasis and arterial thrombosis is also addressed. In recent clinical study results, asundexian appears to reduce ischemic events in patients with myocardial infarction and minor-to-moderate stroke, whereas milvexian possibly provides benefits in patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). In addition, asundexian and milvexian had a minor impact on hemostasis even in combination with dual-antiplatelet therapy. Other orally active FXIa inhibitors also produce antithrombotic activity in vivo with low bleeding risk. Therefore, FXIa inhibitors might represent a new class of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of thrombosis, although the explicit clinical positions of asundexian and milvexian in patients with ischemic stroke, high-risk TIA, and coronary artery disease require confirmation from the outcomes of ongoing phase 3 trials.

The Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of SHR2285, an Oral Small Molecule Factor XIa Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is an unmet need for a safer anticoagulant since bleeding remains a concern with currently approved anticoagulants. Coagulation factor XI (FXI) is an attractive anticoagulant drug target with limited a role in physiological hemostasis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SHR2285, a novel small molecule FXIa inhibitor, in healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

The study consisted of single ascending doses part (part 1: 25-600 mg) and multiple ascending doses part (part 2: 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg). In both parts, subjects were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive SHR2285 or placebo orally. Blood, urine and feces samples were collected to describe its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.

RESULTS

In total, 103 healthy volunteers completed the study. SHR2285 was well tolerated. SHR2285 was absorbed rapidly with median time to maximum plasma concentration (T_max) of 1.50 to 3.00 h. The geometric median half-life (t_1/2) of SHR2285 varied from 8.74 to 12.1 h across 25-600 mg single dose. Total systemic exposure of metabolite SHR164471 was approximately 1.77- to 3.61-fold that of the parent drug. The plasma concentration of SHR2285 and SHR164471 reached steady state by the morning of Day 7, with low accumulation ratio (0.956-1.20 and 1.18-1.56, respectively). The increase in pharmacokinetic exposure of SHR2285 and SHR164471 was less than dose proportional. Food has minimal effect on the pharmacokinetics of SHR2285 and SHR164471. SHR2285 produced an exposure-dependent prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and a decrease in FXI activity. The maximum FXI activity inhibition rate (geometric mean) at steady state was 73.27%, 85.58%, 87.77% and 86.27% for 100-400 mg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SHR2285 was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects across a wide range of doses. SHR2285 exhibited a predictable pharmacokinetic profile and an exposure-related pharmacodynamic profile.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier NCT04472819; registered on July 15, 2020.

Factor XIa Inhibitors as a Novel Anticoagulation Target: Recent Clinical Research Advances

BACKGROUND

While current clinically administered anticoagulant medications have demonstrated effectiveness, they have also precipitated significant risks: severe bleeding complications including, but not limited to, gastrointestinal hemorrhaging and intracranial and other life-threatening major bleedings. An ongoing effort is being made to identify the best targets for anticoagulant-targeted drugs. Coagulation factor XIa (FXIa) is emerging as an important target of current anticoagulant treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This review will summarize the development of anticoagulants and recent advances in clinical trials of experimental factor XI inhibitors from a clinical application perspective.

RESULTS

As of 1 January 2023, our search screening included 33 clinical trials. We summarized the research progress of FXIa inhibitors from seven clinical trials that evaluated their efficacy and safety. The results showed no statistically meaningful distinction in the primary efficacy between patients receiving FXIa inhibitors compared to controls (RR = 0.796; 95% CI: 0.606-1.046; I² = 68%). The outcomes did not indicate a statistical difference in the occurrence of any bleeding between patients receiving FXIa inhibitors compared to controls (RR = 0.717; 95% CI: 0.502-1.023; I² = 60%). A subgroup analysis found significant differences in severe bleeding and clinically relevant hemorrhaging in subjects receiving FXIa inhibitors compared to Enoxaparin (RR = 0.457; 95% CI: 0.256-0.816; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials to date have indicated that factor XIa is a potential anticoagulation target, and factor XIa inhibitors may play an important role in the development of anticoagulants.

Potential anticoagulant of traditional chinese medicine and novel targets for anticoagulant drugs

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulants are the main drugs used for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. Currently, anticoagulant drugs are primarily multitarget heparin drugs, single-target FXa inhibitors and FIIa inhibitors. In addition, some traditional Chinese drugs also have anticoagulant effects, but they are not the main direction of treatment at present. But the anticoagulant drugs mentioned above, all have a common side effect is bleeding. Many other anticoagulation targets are under investigation. With further exploration of coagulation mechanism, how to further determine new anticoagulant targets and how to make traditional Chinese medicine play anticoagulant role have become a new field of exploration.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to summarize the recent research progress on coagulation mechanisms, new anticoagulant targets and traditional Chinese medicine.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database and ClinicalTrials.gov, from the inception of the study to 28 Feb 2023. Key words used in the literature search were "anticoagulation", "anticoagulant targets", "new targets", "coagulation mechanisms", "potential anticoagulant", "herb medicine", "botanical medicine", "Chinese medicine", "traditional Chinese medicine", "blood coagulation factor", keywords are linked with AND/OR. Recent findings on coagulation mechanisms, potential anticoagulant targets and traditional Chinese medicine were studied.

RESULTS

The active components extracted from the Chinese medicinal herbs, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Chuanxiong rhizoma, safflower and Panax notoginseng have obvious anticoagulant effects and can be used as potential anticoagulant drugs, but the risk of bleeding is unclear. TF/FVIIa, FVIII, FIX, FXI, FXII, and FXIII have all been evaluated as targets in animal studies or clinical trials. FIX and FXI are the most studied anticoagulant targets, but FXI inhibitors have shown stronger advantages.

CONCLUSION

This review of potential anticoagulants provides a comprehensive resource. Literature analysis suggests that FXI inhibitors can be used as potential anticoagulant candidates. In addition, we should not ignore the anticoagulant effect of traditional Chinese medicine, and look forward to more research and the emergence of new drugs.