1
|
Yang T, Zhou Y, Wang M, Zhang L, Liu B, Sun L, Shi F, Yuan Y, Zhang G. Effects of remimazolam tosilate on gastrointestinal hormones and gastrointestinal motility in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation: a randomized control trial. Postgrad Med J 2024; 100:635-641. [PMID: 38538569 DOI: 10.1093/postmj/qgae040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impacts of remimazolam tosilate on gastrointestinal hormones and motility in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation. METHODS A total of 262 American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I or II patients, aged 18-65 years, scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation, were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 131 each): the remimazolam tosilate group (Group R) and the propofol group (Group P). Patients in Group R received 0.2-0.25 mg/Kg remimazolam tosilate intravenously, while those in Group P received 1.5-2.0 mg/kg propofol intravenously. The gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed when the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scores were ≤3. The primary endpoints included the endoscopic intestinal peristalsis rating by the endoscopist; serum motilin and gastrin levels at fasting without gastrointestinal preparation (T0), before gastrointestinal endoscopy (T1), and before leaving the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (T2); and the incidences of abdominal distension during Post Anesthesia Care Unit. RESULTS Compared with Group P, intestinal peristalsis rating was higher in Group R (P < .001); Group R showed increased motilin and gastrin levels at T2 compared with Group P (P < .01). There was a rise in motilin and gastrin levels at T1 and T2 compared with T0 and at T2 compared with T1 in both groups (P < .01). The incidence of abdominal distension was lower in Group R (P < .05). CONCLUSION Compared with propofol used during gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation, remimazolam tosilate mildly inhibits the serum motilin and gastrin levels, potentially facilitating the recovery of gastrointestinal motility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyi Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Yinji Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingshan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Lina Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Bing Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Lixin Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaofeng Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kan Z, Min W, Dai Y, Zhang P. Intravenous esketamine as an adjuvant for sedation/analgesia outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1287761. [PMID: 39021840 PMCID: PMC11252540 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1287761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous esketamine as an adjuvant for sedation or analgesia outside the operating room in adults and children. Method PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for potential randomized controlled studies randomized controlled trials comparing drug combinations of esketamine to any other single or combination drug regimens for sedation or analgesia outside the operating room. Results Twenty-five studies with a total of 3,455 participants were included in this review. The pooled results of adults showed that compared with drug regimens of the control group, intravenous esketamine combinations were significantly associated with decreased risk of oxygen desaturation (RR = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.34, 0.70]); hypotension (RR = 0.38, 95% CI = [0.31, 0.46]); bradycardia (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = [0.12, 0.43]); injection pain (RR = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.25, 0.53]); body movement (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = [0.41, 0.88]); and propofol consumption (SMD = -1.38, 95% CI = [-2.64, -0.11]), but an increased risk of psychiatric symptoms (RR = 3.10, 95% CI = [2.11, 4.54]) (RR = relative risk; CI = confidence intervals; SMD = standardized mean difference). Subgroup analysis showed that only the combination of esketamine and propofol significantly reduced the above incidence of respiratory and cardiovascular adverse events in adults. In addition, the pooled results of children showed that compared with drug regimens of the control group, esketamine and propofol co-administration significantly reduced the risk of hypotension (RR = 0.59, 95% CI = [0.37, 0.95]) but increased the risk of visual disturbance (RR = 6.62, 95% CI = [2.18, 20.13]) and dizziness (RR = 1.99, 95% CI = [1.17, 3,37]). Subgroup analysis indicated that esketamine>0.5 mg/kg significantly reduced the incidence of hypotension, but increased the risk of dizziness in children. Conclusion Intravenous use of esketamine, particularly in combination with propofol, may improve the safety and efficacy of sedation and analgesia outside the operating room, although the potential for psychiatric side effects warrants attention. Future research is recommended to investigate the role of esketamine with agents other than propofol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziheng Kan
- School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Weixiang Min
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuee Dai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Y, Deng J, Tong K, Yin Y, Yu R, Tan C. Efficacy and safety of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1379101. [PMID: 38725661 PMCID: PMC11079169 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1379101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of esketamine in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy is still unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods Clinical trials of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy were searched in eight common databases, up to October 2023. These clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as the effect sizes for dichotomous variables and continuity variables, respectively. When the heterogeneity test showed I2 < 50%, the fixed effects model was used for the meta-analysis and TSA; Otherwise, the random effects model was used for them. Results In terms of efficacy endpoints, the meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo or blank, esketamine significantly decreased recovery time by 2.34 min (WMD -2.34; 95% Confidence interval [CI] -3.65, -1.02; p = 0.0005) and propofol consumption by 0.70 mg/kg (WMD -0.70; 95% CI -0.98, -0.43; p < 0.00001), and increased mean heart rate by 4.77 beats/min (WMD 4.77; 95% CI 2.67, 6.87; p < 0.00001) and mean arterial pressure by 3.10 mmHg (WMD 3.10; 95% CI 1.52, 4.67; p = 0.0001), while induction time and mean blood oxygen remained comparable. TSA indicated conclusive evidence for these benefits. In terms of safety endpoints, the meta-analysis revealed that esketamine significantly reduced involuntary movements by 59% (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22, 0.76; p = 0.005) and choking by 51% (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26, 0.92; p = 0.03), while significantly increasing dizziness by 98% (RR 1.98; 95% CI 1.11, 3.56; p = 0.02) and there were no significant differences in total adverse events, respiratory depression, and vomiting. TSA demonstrated conclusive evidence for involuntary movements and dizziness. Low-dose analysis showed that esketamine at ≤0.3 mg/kg significantly reduced recovery time, propofol consumption and involuntary movements, and significantly increasing mean heart rate, with no increase in dizziness. The Begg's test (p = 0.327) and the Egger's test (p = 0.413) indicated no significant publication bias, yet the funnel plot suggested potential publication bias. Conclusion Esketamine is an effective adjuvant anesthesia for children undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, the general dose of esketamine may increase the risk of dizziness, which can be avoided by administering a low dose (≤0.3 mg/kg).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunfeng Yu
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
| | - Juan Deng
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
- The Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Huanan, China
| | - Keke Tong
- College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yuman Yin
- College of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Rong Yu
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
| | - Chuanchuan Tan
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Huanan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ma Y, Wang J, Yang Y, Yao M. Efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for curative endoscopic resection in colorectum: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:96. [PMID: 38459471 PMCID: PMC10924399 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02475-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Curative endoscopic resection is widely used to treat colonic polyps and early stage cancers. The anesthetic strategy commonly involves the use of propofol combined with a small dose of opioids for sedation. Adverse respiratory or cardiovascular events such as hypotension often occur when attempting to achieve the necessary level of sedation. Several studies have suggested its advantages owing to the anesthetic, analgesic, and sympathomimetic properties of esketamine. However, there are no reports on curative colorectal endoscopic resection. We designed this randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of esketamine combined with propofol for sedation in patients undergoing curative colorectal endoscopic resection. METHODS A total of 166 patients who underwent curative colorectal endoscopic resection were randomly assigned to groups A (propofol + fentanyl) or E (propofol + esketamine). Ideal sedation was assessed using the MOAA/S scale and was achieved using TCI-propofol with different doses of fentanyl and esketamine. The propofol consumption and vasoactive drug dosages were recorded. Sedation-related times, adverse events, and satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS Of the 160 patients, the total propofol consumption was significantly lower in group E (n = 81) (300 mg) than in group A (n = 79) (350 mg). Hypotension and bradycardia were significantly lower in Group E than in Group A. The groups showed no significant differences in other adverse events, induction time, recovery time, or patient or endoscopist satisfaction. CONCLUSION Compared to fentanyl, esketamine helps decrease propofol consumption and increases cardiovascular stability during curative colorectal endoscopic resection in American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III patients without affecting anesthesia, patient and endoscopist satisfaction, or other adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ; registration number: ChiCTR2300069014 on 03/03/2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yimei Ma
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiali Wang
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuying Yang
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Minmin Yao
- Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li W, Zhao J, Hao R, Wang S, Chen M, Liu H, Qi L, Hao Z. The Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Combined with Esketamine for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:2875-2887. [PMID: 37746114 PMCID: PMC10516197 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s425860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine for outpatient colonoscopy. Patients and methods A total of 150 outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. A MOAA/S score ≤3 was maintained. The primary outcome was the rate of successful colonoscopy completion. Time indicators, hemodynamic parameters, the consumption of lidocaine, esketamine, propofol and remimazolam besylate, MOAA/S scores and bispectral index (BIS) values, the lowest SpO2, body movement, the use of rescue medication, endoscopist and patient satisfaction, recall of the procedure, mini-mental state examination (MMSE), fatigue level and adverse events were recorded. Results Procedure completion was equivalent between groups (P > 0.05). Both induction and awakening times were significantly shorter in the P group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in colonoscopy time and discharge time (P > 0.05). The lowest SpO2 was significantly lower in the P group, while the level of fatigue was higher (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the R group (P < 0.05). Endoscopist satisfaction was significantly higher in the P group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure between groups except at T5 and T6 (P > 0.05). Both HR and RR were significantly lower in the P group from T3 to T5 (P < 0.05). BIS values were significantly lower in the P group from T3 to T5, while MOAA/S was significantly lower in the P group at T3 and T4 (P < 0.05). Pain on injection was significantly higher in the P group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Remimazolam besylate has a similar efficacy to propofol when combined with subanesthetic doses of esketamine during outpatient colonoscopy. Remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine resulted in less injection pain and more stable hemodynamics, although it prolonged induction and awakening time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Li
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ruiping Hao
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shujuan Wang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Huijun Liu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Le Qi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zaijun Hao
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu X, Xiao Q, Zhuang S. Comparison of propofol-esketamine versus propofol for anesthesia in gastroscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1184709. [PMID: 37614948 PMCID: PMC10442552 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1184709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the effects of propofol-esketamine and propofol in gastroscopy in adults. Methods This randomized controlled clinical trial was performed from January 2021 to March 2021. Eighty patients were enrolled and allocated into normal saline group (group N) and esketamine group (group E). The primary outcome was total amount of propofol. Secondary outcomes included incidences of injection pain, involuntary movement, hemodynamic and respiratory adverse events during examination, total examination time, recovery time and postoperative adverse effects. Results Total amount of propofol was significantly smaller in group E (101.64 ± 32.64 mg) than in group N (129.55 ± 36.34 mg, p = 0.001). Incidences of injection pain, involuntary movement and hypotension was significantly lower in group E than in group N. Incidences of hypertension and tachycardia was higher in group E than in group N. There was no significant difference in incidences of laryngospasm or hypoxemia, total examination time, recovery time, incidences of postoperative adverse effects between two groups. Conclusion Combination of propofol with 0.2 mg/kg esketamine reduced total amount of propofol, provided a more stable hemodynamic status and did not affect recovery time in gastroscopy. Clinical trial registration http://www.chictr.org, identifier ChiCTR2100042406.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shaohui Zhuang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lian X, Lin Y, Luo T, Jing Y, Yuan H, Guo Y. Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:204. [PMID: 37312027 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02167-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy often require propofol-based sedation combined with analgesics. At present, the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients remains controversial. Moreover, there is no universal agreement regarding the appropriate dose of esketamine supplementation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients. METHODS Seven electronic databases and three clinical trial registry platforms were searched and the deadline was February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of esketamine for sedation were included by two reviewers. Data from the eligible studies were combined to calculate the pooled risk ratio or standardized mean difference. RESULTS Eighteen studies with 1962 esketamine participants were included in the analysis. As an adjunct to propofol, the administration of esketamine reduced the recovery time compared to normal saline (NS). However, there was no significant difference between the opioids group and ketamine group. For propofol dosage, the administration of esketamine required a lower propofol dosage compared to the NS group and opioids group].For complications, the esketamine group had fewer complications compared to the NS group and opioid group in patients, but there were no significant differences between the esketamine group and ketamine group. Notably, the coadministration of esketamine was associated with a higher risk of visual disturbance compared to the NS group. In addition, we used subgroup analysis to investigate whether 0.2-0.5 mg/kg esketamine was effective and tolerable for patients. CONCLUSION Esketamine as an adjunct to propofol, is an appropriate effective alternative for sedation in participants undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, considering the possibility of its psychotomimetic effects, esketamine should be used with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianghong Lian
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunzhu Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
| | - Ting Luo
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Jing
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongbo Yuan
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Yixin Guo
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
- Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|