Exploring the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease by microarray data analysis

Cell-Specific Gene Networks and Drivers in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Tissues

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune and inflammatory disease characterized by inflammation and hyperplasia of the synovial tissues. RA pathogenesis involves multiple cell types, genes, transcription factors (TFs) and networks. Yet, little is known about the TFs, and key drivers and networks regulating cell function and disease at the synovial tissue level, which is the site of disease. In the present study, we used available RNA-seq databases generated from synovial tissues and developed a novel approach to elucidate cell type-specific regulatory networks on synovial tissue genes in RA. We leverage established computational methodologies to infer sample-specific gene regulatory networks and applied statistical methods to compare network properties across phenotypic groups (RA versus osteoarthritis). We developed computational approaches to rank TFs based on their contribution to the observed phenotypic differences between RA and controls across different cell types. We identified 18,16,19,11 key regulators of fibroblast-like synoviocyte (FLS), T cells, B cells, and monocyte signatures and networks, respectively, in RA synovial tissues. Interestingly, FLS and B cells were driven by multiple independent co-regulatory TF clusters that included MITF, HLX, BACH1 (FLS) and KLF13, FOSB, FOSL1 (synovial B cells). However, monocytes were collectively governed by a single cluster of TF drivers, responsible for the main phenotypic differences between RA and controls, which included RFX5, IRF9, CREB5. Among several cell subset and pathway changes, we also detected reduced presence of NKT cell and eosinophils in RA synovial tissues. Overall, our novel approach identified new and previously unsuspected KDG, TF and networks and should help better understanding individual cell regulation and co-regulatory networks in RA pathogenesis, as well as potentially generate new targets for treatment.

Identification and validation of disulfidptosis-related gene signatures and their subtype in diabetic nephropathy

Background: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the most common complication of diabetes, and its pathogenesis is complex involving a variety of programmed cell death, inflammatory responses, and autophagy mechanisms. Disulfidptosis is a newly discovered mechanism of cell death. There are little studies about the role of disulfidptosis on DN. Methods: First, we obtained the data required for this study from the GeneCards database, the Nephroseq v5 database, and the GEO database. Through differential analysis, we obtained differential disulfidptosis-related genes. At the same time, through WGCNA analysis, we obtained key module genes in DN patients. The obtained intersecting genes were further screened by Lasso as well as SVM-RFE. By intersecting the results of the two, we ended up with a key gene for diabetic nephropathy. The diagnostic performance and expression of key genes were verified by the GSE30528, GSE30529, GSE96804, and Nephroseq v5 datasets. Using clinical information from the Nephroseq v5 database, we investigated the correlation between the expression of key genes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine content. Next, we constructed a nomogram and analyzed the immune microenvironment of patients with DN. The identification of subtypes facilitates individualized treatment of patients with DN. Results: We obtained 91 differential disulfidptosis-related genes. Through WGCNA analysis, we obtained 39 key module genes in DN patients. Taking the intersection of the two, we preliminarily screened 20 genes characteristic of DN. Through correlation analysis, we found that these 20 genes are positively correlated with each other. Further screening by Lasso and SVM-RFE algorithms and intersecting the results of the two, we identified CXCL6, CD48, C1QB, and COL6A3 as key genes in DN. Clinical correlation analysis found that the expression levels of key genes were closely related to eGFR. Immune cell infiltration is higher in samples from patients with DN than in normal samples. Conclusion: We identified and validated 4 DN key genes from disulfidptosis-related genes that CXCL6, CD48, C1QB, and COL6A3 may be key genes that promote the onset of DN and are closely related to the eGFR and immune cell infiltrated in the kidney tissue.

Tubular injury in diabetic kidney disease: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic perspectives

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a chronic complication of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Currently, there are limited therapeutic drugs available for DKD. While previous research has primarily focused on glomerular injury, recent studies have increasingly emphasized the role of renal tubular injury in the pathogenesis of DKD. Various factors, including hyperglycemia, lipid accumulation, oxidative stress, hypoxia, RAAS, ER stress, inflammation, EMT and programmed cell death, have been shown to induce renal tubular injury and contribute to the progression of DKD. Additionally, traditional hypoglycemic drugs, anti-inflammation therapies, anti-senescence therapies, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and stem cell therapies have demonstrated their potential to alleviate renal tubular injury in DKD. This review will provide insights into the latest research on the mechanisms and treatments of renal tubular injury in DKD.

Identification of pyroptosis-related genes and potential drugs in diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the serious microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). A growing body of research has demonstrated that the inflammatory state plays a critical role in the incidence and development of DN. Pyroptosis is a new way of programmed cell death, which has the particularity of natural immune inflammation. The inhibition of inflammatory cytokine expression and regulation of pathways related to pyroptosis may be a novel strategy for DN treatment. The aim of this study is to identify pyroptosis-related genes and potential drugs for DN.

METHODS

DN differentially expressed pyroptosis-related genes were identified via bioinformatic analysis Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset GSE96804. Dataset GSE30528 and GSE142025 were downloaded to verify pyroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to construct a pyroptosis-related gene predictive model. A consensus clustering analysis was performed to identify pyroptosis-related DN subtypes. Subsequently, Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), Gene Ontology (GO) function enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were conducted to explore the differences between DN clusters. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was used to select hub genes and DGIdb database was utilized to screen potential therapeutic drugs/compounds targeting hub genes.

RESULTS

A total of 24 differentially expressed pyroptosis-related genes were identified in DN. A 16 gene predictive model was conducted via LASSO regression analysis. According to the expression level of these 16 genes, DN cases were divided into two subtypes, and the subtypes are mainly associated with inflammation, activation of immune response and cell metabolism. In addition, we identified 10 hub genes among these subtypes, and predicted 65 potential DN therapeutics that target key genes.

CONCLUSION

We identified two pyroptosis-related DN clusters and 65 potential therapeutical agents/compounds for DN, which might shed a light on the treatment of DN.