Adverse reaction signals mining and hemorrhagic signals comparison of ticagrelor and clopidogrel: A pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS

Safety assessment of Tafamidis: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events

OBJECTIVE

Tafamidis-associated adverse events (AEs) were investigated retrospectively by data mining the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to inform clinical safety.

METHODS

Data were gathered from the FAERS database, which spans the second quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2023. A total number of 8532 reports of Tafamidis-related adverse events were detected after evaluating 8,432,351 data. Disproportionality analyses were used to quantify the signal and assess the significance of Tafamidis-associated AEs using four algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN).

RESULTS

Among the 8532 reports of AEs with Tafamidis as the primary suspected drug, Tafamidis-induced AEs were identified as occurring in 27 system organ classes (SOC). A total of 207 Tafamidis-induced AEs were detected which simultaneously complied with the four algorithms. Our analysis also identified new adverse reactions including Hypoacusis, Deafness, and Essential hypertension. The median onset of adverse reactions associated with Tafamidis was 180 days (interquartile range [IQR] 51-419 days).

CONCLUSION

Tafamidis is a drug that has shown favorable safety and tolerability results in clinical trials. However, a number of adverse reactions associated with Tafamidis have been identified through analysis of the FAERS database. In clinical applications, it is recommended to closely monitor patients' hearing while using Tafamidis. In addition, it is hoped that further experimental and clinical studies will be conducted in the future to understand the mechanism of occurrence between Tafamidis and adverse reactions such as primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and height reduction.

Anti-seizure medications-associated bladder and urethral symptoms: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, observations have been made regarding bladder and urethral symptoms (BUS), notably urinary frequency and urgency, among patients prescribed the anti-seizure medication (ASM) lacosamide. However, the precise association between ASMs and BUS events in real-world settings remains elusive.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were employed and the analysis focused on ASMs-associated BUS events utilizing disproportionality analysis methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Furthermore, co-administration, time to onset of ASMs-associated BUS events, and severity assessments were conducted.

RESULTS

Several ASMs demonstrated statistically meaningful associations with BUS signals, notably ezogabine, valproic acid/valproate sodium, and clorazepate (p < 0.05). And ASMs-associated BUS events predominantly occurred within the first week and persisted for more than 180 days afterward. Diazepam, gabapentin, and brivaracetam exhibited distinct risk profiles for severe BUS events compared to valproic acid/sodium valproate (p < 0.05). And the nomogram constructed in this study exhibited robust predictive performance.

CONCLUSION

This study yields valuable insights into the association between ASMs and BUS events, but several limitations warrant consideration. Nonetheless, these findings emphasize the significance of vigilance and proactive management of ASMs-associated BUS events.

Cardiovascular adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database

Objective

As a novel drug formulation, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are widely used in various types of cancer. However, clinically, there is a lack of attention to the CVD produced by them, as well as a lack of research on the real-world situation. Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, to ensure its clinical safety application, we analyzed post-marketing data on antitumor ADCs to identify risk factors and drugs associated with the risk of cardiovascular events.

Research design and methods

We used OpenVigil 2.1 to conduct a database query for adverse events (AEs) reported to the FAERS database between the time the drug was launched and the second quarter of 2023. Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were grouped into fourteen narrow categories using the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs), and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) for reporting the association between different drugs and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk were calculated.

Results

In the FAERS database, 1863 AEs associated with CVD we studied were identified in patients receiving ADC therapy. Most reports came from people aged ≥65, but a significant number of cases were found to be unknown. The number of patients with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)-related CVD cases aged <18 years, 18-64 years, and≥ 65 years was 52 (2.79%), 586 (31.45%), and 613 (32.90%), respectively. The proportion of female patients (834, 44.77%) was higher than that of male patients (752, 40.37%). Death (770 reports), disability (9 reports), Hospitalization initial or prolonged (407 reports), and life-threatening reactions (187 reports). Of the 770 deaths reported, 103 (31.7%) were associated with brentuximab vedotin, 10 (24.4%) with sacituzumab govitecan, 22 (19.3%) with enfortumab vedotin, and 35 (34.7%) with trastuzumab emtansine.49 (41.2%) cases were associated with polatuzumab vedotin, 62 (29%) with trastuzumab deruxtecan, 423 (54.3%) with gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and 66 (38.8%) with inotuzumab ozogamicin. In a disproportionate number of SMQS, cardiac failure (n = 277) and embolic and thrombotic events, venous (n = 446) were the most frequently reported CVD-related AEs in ADCs.

Conclusion

By mining the FAERS database, we provided relevant information on the association between ADC use and cardiovascular-associated AEs. ADCs were associated with increased cardiovascular toxicity, deserving distinct monitoring and appropriate management. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess causality.

A disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for ticagrelor

Background

Ticagrelor is a commonly used antiplatelet agent, but due to the stringent criteria for trial population inclusion and the limited sample size, its safety profile has not been fully elucidated.

Method

We utilized OpenVigil 2.1 to query the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and retrieved reports by the generic name "ticagrelor" published between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2023. Adverse drug events (ADEs) were classified and described according to the preferred terms and system organ classes in the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activity. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) were used to detect signals.

Results

The number of ADE reports with ticagrelor as the primary suspect drug was 12,909. The top three ADEs were dyspnea [1824 reports, ROR 7.34, PRR 6.45, information component (IC) 2.68], chest pain (458 reports, ROR 5.43, PRR 5.27, IC 2.39), and vascular stent thrombosis (406 reports, ROR 409.53, PRR 396.68, IC 8.02). The highest ROR, 630.24, was found for "vascular stent occlusion". Cardiac arrest (137 reports, ROR 3.41, PRR 3.39, IC 1.75), atrial fibrillation (99 reports, ROR 2.05, PRR 2.04, IC 1.03), asphyxia (101 reports, ROR 23.60, PRR 23.43, IC 4.51), and rhabdomyolysis (57 reports, ROR 2.75, PRR 2.75, IC 1.45) were suspected new adverse events of ticagrelor.

Conclusion

The FAERS database produced potential signals associated with ticagrelor that have not been recorded in the package inserts, such as cardiac arrest, atrial fibrillation, asphyxia, and rhabdomyolysis. Further clinical surveillance is needed to quantify and validate potential hazards associated with ticagrelor-related adverse events.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of mepolizumab in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

Mepolizumab is primarily used in the treatment of asthma, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilia syndrome, and chronic rhinitis with nasal polyps. The information about its adverse drug reactions is mainly derived from clinical trials, and there is a shortage of real-world studies with extensive sample sizes. In this study, the U.S. FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was analyzed to evaluate the side effects of mepolizumab. A total of 18,040 reports of mepolizumab-associated adverse events were identified from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Multiple disproportionality analysis algorithms were used to determine the significance of these AEs. The study identified 198 instances of mepolizumab-induced AEs, including some important AEs not mentioned in the product labeling. The time to onset of adverse reactions was also analyzed, with a median time of 109 days. Most AEs occurred within the first month of mepolizumab use, but some may still occur after 1 year of treatment. Gender-specific analysis showed different high-risk AEs for females (digestive and neurological side effects) and males (serious adverse effects leading to hospitalization and death). The findings mentioned provide valuable insights on optimizing the use of mepolizumab, enhancing its effectiveness, and minimizing potential side effects. This information will greatly contribute to the practical implementation of the drug in clinical settings.

Indication and adverse event profiles of denosumab and zoledronic acid: based on U.S. FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

Objective: To investigate adverse events (AEs) associated with denosumab (Dmab) and zoledronic acid (ZA), compare their association strengths, and explore potential applications to provide clinical reference. Methods: We collected data from FAERS from January 2004 to November 2022 and mined AE signals for Dmab and ZA using ROR values. We compared signal intensity for same AEs and investigated off-label use. We also examined their AEs in adjuvant therapy for breast and prostate cancer. Results: 154,735 reports of primary suspect drugs were analyzed in the FAERS database (Dmab: 117,857; ZA: 36,878). Dmab and ZA had 333 and 1,379 AE signals, with 189 overlaps. The AEs of Dmab included death (ROR:3.478), osteonecrosis of jaw (ROR:53.025), back pain (ROR:2.432), tooth disorder (ROR:16.18), bone pain (ROR:6.523). For ZA, the AEs included osteonecrosis (ROR:104.866), death (ROR: 3.645), pain (ROR:3.963), osteonecrosis of jaw (ROR: 91.744), tooth extraction (ROR: 142.143). Among overlap signals, Dmab showed higher strength in exostosis of the jaw (ROR: 182.66 vs. 5.769), atypical fractures (ROR: 55.589 vs. 9.123), and atypical femur fractures (ROR:49.824 vs. 4.968). And ZA exhibited stronger associations in abscess jaw (ROR: 84.119 vs. 11.12), gingival ulceration (ROR: 74.125 vs. 4.827), increased bone formation (ROR: 69.344 vs. 3.218). Additionally, we identified 528 off-label uses for Dmab and 206 for ZA, with Dmab mainly used in prostate cancer (1.04%), breast cancer (1.03%), and arthritis (0.42%), while ZA in breast cancer (3.21%), prostate cancer (2.48%), and neoplasm malignant (0.52%). For Dmab in breast cancer treatment, AEs included death (11.6%), disease progression (3.3%), and neutropenia (2.7%), while for ZA included death (19.8%), emotional disorder (12.9%), osteomyelitis (11.7%). For prostate cancer treatment, Dmab`s AEs were death (8.9%), prostate cancer metastatic (1.6%), renal impairment (1.7%), while ZA`s included death (34.4%), general physical health deterioration (19.9%), and hemoglobin decreased (18.9%). Conclusion: Our analysis of FAERS database provided postmarketing surveillance data and revealed different strengths of reported AE signals between Dmab and ZA in some of their common AEs. It's also worth noting that both drugs have potential off-label applications, which could introduce new AEs. This highlights the necessity for safety monitoring when using Dmab and ZA off-label.

A pharmacovigilance study of etoposide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, what does the real world say?

Introduction: Etoposide is a broad-spectrum antitumor drug that has been extensively studied in clinical trials. However, limited information is available regarding its real-world adverse reactions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess and evaluate etoposide-related adverse events in a real-world setting by using data mining method on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Through the analysis of 16,134,686 reports in the FAERS database, a total of 9,892 reports of etoposide-related adverse drug events (ADEs) were identified. To determine the significance of these ADEs, various disproportionality analysis algorithms were applied, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. Results: As a result, 478 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) that were identified by all four algorithms were retained. These PTs included commonly reported adverse events such as thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, anemia, stomatitis, and pneumonitis, which align with those documented in the drug's instructions and previous clinical trials. However, our analysis also uncovered unexpected and significant ADEs, including thrombotic microangiopathy, ototoxicity, second primary malignancy, nephropathy toxic, and ovarian failure. Furthermore, we examined the time-to-onset (TTO) of these ADEs using the Weibull distribution test and found that the median TTO for etoposide-associated ADEs was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-32 days). The majority of cases occurred within the first month (73.8%) after etoposide administration. Additionally, our analysis revealed specific high-risk signals for males, such as pneumonia and cardiac infarction, while females showed signals for drug resistance and ototoxicity. Discussion: These findings provide valuable insight into the occurrence of ADEs following etoposide initiation, which can potentially support clinical monitoring and risk identification efforts.

High risks adverse events associated with trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of HER2-positive/mutated malignancies: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

T-DM1 and T-DXd are two promising antibody-drug conjugates for treating advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and HER2-mutated lung cancer. Understanding the differences in the adverse events (AEs) profile of both drugs may help clinicians make an appropriate treatment decision.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All data obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from Q1 2004 to Q3 2022 underwent disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis to detect and assess the AE signals of T-DM1 and T-DXd for comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 2,113 and 1,269 AE reports associated with T-DM1 and T-Dxd, respectively, were retrieved from FAERS database, in which, respondents were mostly elderly women. Their statistical differences (p < 0.001), poses high incidence of thrombocytopenia, including cardiotoxicity (p < 0.05) for T-DM1, while myelosuppression, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and pneumonitis for T-DXd. Splenomegaly, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, hepatic cirrhosis, portal hypertension, neuropathy peripheral, and spider nevus, are particular to T-DM1. Similarly, febrile neutropenia, pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, neutrophil count decreased, and KL-6 increased, are unique to T-DXd.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DXd is more likely to induce ILD/pneumonia and myelosuppression than T-DM1, whereas T-DM1 has higher risk of hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia than T-DXd. T-DM1-related hepatotoxicity may need redefinition. Clinicians may need to balance the benefits and risks of antibody-drug conjugates treatment for certain patients.