1
|
Sapuk A, Steinhoff L, Huenninghaus K, Willuweit K, Rashidi Alavijeh J, Hild B, Asar L, Schmidt HH, Schramm C. Long-Term Treatment with Bulevirtide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis D and Advanced Chronic Liver Disease. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 2024:2364031. [PMID: 39081834 PMCID: PMC11288691 DOI: 10.1155/2024/2364031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Bulevirtide (BLV) is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis D (CHD). Because only limited long-term experience has been reported, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BLV treatment in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with CHD who received BLV 2 mg/day for >12 months at a tertiary center. Virological response (VR) was defined as a reduction in hepatitis delta virus-ribonucleic acid (HDV-RNA) ≥2 log10 from baseline or HDV-RNA negativity and biochemical response (BR) as gender-specific normalization of transaminases. We identified 14 patients (9 men, 5 women; median age of 48 years; interquartile range (IQR) of 37-55), of whom 12 (86%) had suggested or assumed ACLD according to Baveno VI criteria. The median duration of BLV treatment was 26 months (IQR 17-27). During treatment, the mean HDV-RNA level decreased from log10 5.58 IU/ml to levels between log10 2.19 IU/ml and log10 3.19 IU/ml. HDV-RNA negativity was achieved in up to 63% after 24 months. VR and BR were 86% and 43% after 12 months, 90% and 60% after 18 months, 75% and 75% after 24 months, and 100% and 50% after 30 months, respectively. Two nonpersisting viral breakthroughs were observed after 24 months of treatment. The Child Pugh score and model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores remained stable or improved in 12 patients (86%). Only one patient developed hepatic decompensation after 24 months of treatment with ascites requiring large-volume paracentesis which was not associated with viral breakthrough, portal vein thrombosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment with BLV beyond one year is effective and safe for patients with CHD and ACLD. Liver function remained stable or improved during treatment in the vast majority of patients, and only one case of hepatic decompensation occurred during a median follow-up of 26 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaz Sapuk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Leonie Steinhoff
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kristin Huenninghaus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Katharina Willuweit
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jassin Rashidi Alavijeh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Hild
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lucia Asar
- Institute for VirologyUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hartmut H. Schmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Schramm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantational MedicineUniversity Hospital Essen, and Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krohmer E, Rohr BS, Stoll F, Gümüs KS, Bergamino M, Mikus G, Sauter M, Burhenne J, Weiss J, Meid AD, Czock D, Blank A, Haefeli WE. Influence of a Short Course of Ritonavir Used as Booster in Antiviral Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2 on the Exposure of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2023:10.1007/s10557-023-07538-w. [PMID: 38112932 DOI: 10.1007/s10557-023-07538-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early antiviral treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is recommended for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at high risk for severe courses. Such patients are usually chronically ill and susceptible to adverse drug interactions caused by ritonavir. We investigated the interactions of short-term low-dose ritonavir therapy with atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, two statins commonly used in this population. METHOD We assessed exposure changes (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC∞) and maximum concentration (Cmax)) of a single dose of 10 mg atorvastatin and 10 mg rosuvastatin before and on the fifth day of ritonavir treatment (2 × 100 mg/day) in healthy volunteers and developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to estimate dose adjustment of atorvastatin during ritonavir treatment. RESULTS By the fifth day of ritonavir treatment, the AUC∞ of atorvastatin increased 4.76-fold and Cmax 3.78-fold, and concurrently, the concentration of atorvastatin metabolites decreased to values below the lower limit of quantification. Pharmacokinetic modelling indicated that a stepwise reduction in atorvastatin dose during ritonavir treatment with a stepwise increase up to 4 days after ritonavir discontinuation can keep atorvastatin exposure within safe and effective margins. Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics were only mildly modified; ritonavir significantly increased the Cmax 1.94-fold, while AUC∞ was unchanged. CONCLUSION Atorvastatin doses should likely be adjusted during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. For patients on a 20-mg dose, we recommend half of the original dose. In patients taking 40 mg or more, a quarter of the dose should be taken until 2 days after discontinuation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Patients receiving rosuvastatin do not need to change their treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number: 2021-006634-39. DRKS00027838.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Krohmer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Brit Silja Rohr
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felicitas Stoll
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja S Gümüs
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mariano Bergamino
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerd Mikus
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Sauter
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Burhenne
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johanna Weiss
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas D Meid
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Czock
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Blank
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Walter E Haefeli
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|