1
|
Isaksson LJ, Mastroleo F, Vincini MG, Marvaso G, Zaffaroni M, Gola M, Mazzola GC, Bergamaschi L, Gaito S, Alongi F, Doyen J, Fossati P, Haustermans K, Høyer M, Langendijk JA, Matute R, Orlandi E, Schwarz M, Troost EGC, Vondracek V, La Torre D, Curigliano G, Petralia G, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Jereczek-Fossa BA. The emerging role of Artificial Intelligence in proton therapy: A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 204:104485. [PMID: 39233128 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made a tremendous impact in the space of healthcare, and proton therapy is not an exception. Proton therapy has witnessed growing popularity in oncology over recent decades, and researchers are increasingly looking to develop AI and machine learning tools to aid in various steps of the treatment planning and delivery processes. This review delves into the emergent role of AI in proton therapy, evaluating its development, advantages, intended clinical contexts, and areas of application. Through the analysis of 76 studies, we aim to underscore the importance of AI applications in advancing proton therapy and to highlight their prospective influence on clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Johannes Isaksson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy.
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Michał Gola
- Department of Human Histology and Embryology, Collegium Medicum, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn 10-082, Poland
| | - Giovanni Carlo Mazzola
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Simona Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar-Verona, Italy & DSMC, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice 06189, France; University Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U1081, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice (IRCAN), 06189 Nice, France, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice 06189, France
| | - Piero Fossati
- EBG MedAustron GmbH, Marie-Curie-Str. 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria; Department of General and Translational Oncology and Hematology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, 3500, Austria
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Morten Høyer
- Aarhus University (AU), Nordre Ringgade 1, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark
| | - Johannes Albertus Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Raùl Matute
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid 28223, Spain
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy; Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Schwarz
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01309, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden 01307, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01309, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden 01328, Germany
| | - Vladimir Vondracek
- Proton Therapy Centre Czech, Prague, Czech Republic and Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Davide La Torre
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy; SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy; Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20141, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kazemi Kozani M. Machine learning approach for proton range verification using real-time prompt gamma imaging with Compton cameras: addressing the total deposited energy information gap. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:075019. [PMID: 38417182 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad2e6a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Compton camera imaging shows promise as a range verification technique in proton therapy. This work aims to assess the performance of a machine learning model in Compton camera imaging for proton beam range verification improvement.Approach.The presented approach was used to recognize Compton events and estimate more accurately the prompt gamma (PG) energy in the Compton camera to reconstruct the PGs emission profile during proton therapy. This work reports the results obtained from the Geant4 simulation for a proton beam impinging on a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) target. To validate the versatility of such an approach, the produced PG emissions interact with a scintillating fiber-based Compton camera.Main results.A trained multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network shows that it was possible to achieve a notable three-fold increase in the signal-to-total ratio. Furthermore, after event selection by the trained MLP, the loss of full-energy PGs was compensated by means of fitting an MLP energy regression model to the available data from true Compton (signal) events, predicting more precisely the total deposited energy for Compton events with incomplete energy deposition.Significance.A considerable improvement in the Compton camera's performance was demonstrated in determining the distal falloff and identifying a few millimeters of target displacements. This approach has shown great potential for enhancing online proton range monitoring with Compton cameras in future clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Kazemi Kozani
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schilling A, Aehle M, Alme J, Barnaföldi GG, Bodova T, Borshchov V, van den Brink A, Eikeland V, Feofilov G, Garth C, Gauger NR, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Igolkin S, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, Kortus T, Leonhardt V, Mehendale S, Ningappa Mulawade R, Harald Odland O, O'Neill G, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Pettersen HES, Piersimoni P, Protsenko M, Rauch M, Ur Rehman A, Richter M, Röhrich D, Santana J, Seco J, Songmoolnak A, Sudár Á, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Volz L, Wagner B, Wendzel S, Wiebel A, Xiao R, Yang S, Zillien S. Uncertainty-aware spot rejection rate as quality metric for proton therapy using a digital tracking calorimeter. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:194001. [PMID: 37652034 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf5c2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Proton therapy is highly sensitive to range uncertainties due to the nature of the dose deposition of charged particles. To ensure treatment quality, range verification methods can be used to verify that the individual spots in a pencil beam scanning treatment fraction match the treatment plan. This study introduces a novel metric for proton therapy quality control based on uncertainties in range verification of individual spots.Approach.We employ uncertainty-aware deep neural networks to predict the Bragg peak depth in an anthropomorphic phantom based on secondary charged particle detection in a silicon pixel telescope designed for proton computed tomography. The subsequently predicted Bragg peak positions, along with their uncertainties, are compared to the treatment plan, rejecting spots which are predicted to be outside the 95% confidence interval. The such-produced spot rejection rate presents a metric for the quality of the treatment fraction.Main results.The introduced spot rejection rate metric is shown to be well-defined for range predictors with well-calibrated uncertainties. Using this method, treatment errors in the form of lateral shifts can be detected down to 1 mm after around 1400 treated spots with spot intensities of 1 × 107protons. The range verification model used in this metric predicts the Bragg peak depth to a mean absolute error of 1.107 ± 0.015 mm.Significance.Uncertainty-aware machine learning has potential applications in proton therapy quality control. This work presents the foundation for future developments in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schilling
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Max Aehle
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Johan Alme
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Tea Bodova
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Viljar Eikeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Christoph Garth
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Nicolas R Gauger
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Ola Grøttvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Håvard Helstrup
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Ralf Keidel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Chinorat Kobdaj
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Tobias Kortus
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Viktor Leonhardt
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Shruti Mehendale
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Raju Ningappa Mulawade
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Odd Harald Odland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - George O'Neill
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Gábor Papp
- Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/A Pázmány P. Sétány, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Peitzmann
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Pierluigi Piersimoni
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | - Maksym Protsenko
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPELTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Max Rauch
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Attiq Ur Rehman
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Matthias Richter
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Dieter Röhrich
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Joshua Santana
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnon Songmoolnak
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Ákos Sudár
- Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
- Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ganesh Tambave
- Center for Medical and Radiation Physics (CMRP), National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Ihor Tymchuk
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPELTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Kjetil Ullaland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Boris Wagner
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Steffen Wendzel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Wiebel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - RenZheng Xiao
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiming Yang
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Sebastian Zillien
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graeff C, Volz L, Durante M. Emerging technologies for cancer therapy using accelerated particles. PROGRESS IN PARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS 2023; 131:104046. [PMID: 37207092 PMCID: PMC7614547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Cancer therapy with accelerated charged particles is one of the most valuable biomedical applications of nuclear physics. The technology has vastly evolved in the past 50 years, the number of clinical centers is exponentially growing, and recent clinical results support the physics and radiobiology rationale that particles should be less toxic and more effective than conventional X-rays for many cancer patients. Charged particles are also the most mature technology for clinical translation of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy. However, the fraction of patients treated with accelerated particles is still very small and the therapy is only applied to a few solid cancer indications. The growth of particle therapy strongly depends on technological innovations aiming to make the therapy cheaper, more conformal and faster. The most promising solutions to reach these goals are superconductive magnets to build compact accelerators; gantryless beam delivery; online image-guidance and adaptive therapy with the support of machine learning algorithms; and high-intensity accelerators coupled to online imaging. Large international collaborations are needed to hasten the clinical translation of the research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Graeff
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Lennart Volz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Dipartimento di Fisica “Ettore Pancini”, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meric I, Alagoz E, Hysing LB, Kögler T, Lathouwers D, Lionheart WRB, Mattingly J, Obhodas J, Pausch G, Pettersen HES, Ratliff HN, Rovituso M, Schellhammer SM, Setterdahl LM, Skjerdal K, Sterpin E, Sudac D, Turko JA, Ytre-Hauge KS. A hybrid multi-particle approach to range assessment-based treatment verification in particle therapy. Sci Rep 2023; 13:6709. [PMID: 37185591 PMCID: PMC10130067 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33777-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy (PT) used for cancer treatment can spare healthy tissue and reduce treatment toxicity. However, full exploitation of the dosimetric advantages of PT is not yet possible due to range uncertainties, warranting development of range-monitoring techniques. This study proposes a novel range-monitoring technique introducing the yet unexplored concept of simultaneous detection and imaging of fast neutrons and prompt-gamma rays produced in beam-tissue interactions. A quasi-monolithic organic detector array is proposed, and its feasibility for detecting range shifts in the context of proton therapy is explored through Monte Carlo simulations of realistic patient models and detector resolution effects. The results indicate that range shifts of [Formula: see text] can be detected at relatively low proton intensities ([Formula: see text] protons/spot) when spatial information obtained through imaging of both particle species are used simultaneously. This study lays the foundation for multi-particle detection and imaging systems in the context of range verification in PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilker Meric
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 7030, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Enver Alagoz
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 7030, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Liv B Hysing
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7803, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Toni Kögler
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| | | | | | - John Mattingly
- Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | | | - Guntram Pausch
- Target Systemelektronik GmbH & Co. KG, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Helge E S Pettersen
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hunter N Ratliff
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 7030, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Sonja M Schellhammer
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lena M Setterdahl
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 7030, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kyrre Skjerdal
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 7030, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Joseph A Turko
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristian S Ytre-Hauge
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7803, 5020, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiang Z, Polf JC, Barajas CA, Gobbert MK, Ren L. A feasibility study of enhanced prompt gamma imaging for range verification in proton therapy using deep learning. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/acbf9a. [PMID: 36848674 PMCID: PMC10173868 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acbf9a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Background and objective. Range uncertainty is a major concern affecting the delivery precision in proton therapy. The Compton camera (CC)-based prompt-gamma (PG) imaging is a promising technique to provide 3Din vivorange verification. However, the conventional back-projected PG images suffer from severe distortions due to the limited view of the CC, significantly limiting its clinical utility. Deep learning has demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing medical images from limited-view measurements. But different from other medical images with abundant anatomical structures, the PGs emitted along the path of a proton pencil beam take up an extremely low portion of the 3D image space, presenting both the attention and the imbalance challenge for deep learning. To solve these issues, we proposed a two-tier deep learning-based method with a novel weighted axis-projection loss to generate precise 3D PG images to achieve accurate proton range verification.Materials and methods: the proposed method consists of two models: first, a localization model is trained to define a region-of-interest (ROI) in the distorted back-projected PG image that contains the proton pencil beam; second, an enhancement model is trained to restore the true PG emissions with additional attention on the ROI. In this study, we simulated 54 proton pencil beams (energy range: 75-125 MeV, dose level: 1 × 109protons/beam and 3 × 108protons/beam) delivered at clinical dose rates (20 kMU min-1and 180 kMU min-1) in a tissue-equivalent phantom using Monte-Carlo (MC). PG detection with a CC was simulated using the MC-Plus-Detector-Effects model. Images were reconstructed using the kernel-weighted-back-projection algorithm, and were then enhanced by the proposed method.Results. The method effectively restored the 3D shape of the PG images with the proton pencil beam range clearly visible in all testing cases. Range errors were within 2 pixels (4 mm) in all directions in most cases at a higher dose level. The proposed method is fully automatic, and the enhancement takes only ∼0.26 s.Significance. Overall, this preliminary study demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed method to generate accurate 3D PG images using a deep learning framework, providing a powerful tool for high-precisionin vivorange verification of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuoran Jiang
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jerimy C. Polf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Carlos A. Barajas
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
| | - Matthias K. Gobbert
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
| | - Lei Ren
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Llosá G, Rafecas M. Hybrid PET/Compton-camera imaging: an imager for the next generation. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS 2023; 138:214. [PMID: 36911362 PMCID: PMC9990967 DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03805-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Compton cameras can offer advantages over gamma cameras for some applications, since they are well suited for multitracer imaging and for imaging high-energy radiotracers, such as those employed in radionuclide therapy. While in conventional clinical settings state-of-the-art Compton cameras cannot compete with well-established methods such as PET and SPECT, there are specific scenarios in which they can constitute an advantageous alternative. The combination of PET and Compton imaging can benefit from the improved resolution and sensitivity of current PET technology and, at the same time, overcome PET limitations in the use of multiple radiotracers. Such a system can provide simultaneous assessment of different radiotracers under identical conditions and reduce errors associated with physical factors that can change between acquisitions. Advances are being made both in instrumentation developments combining PET and Compton cameras for multimodal or three-gamma imaging systems, and in image reconstruction, addressing the challenges imposed by the combination of the two modalities or the new techniques. This review article summarizes the advances made in Compton cameras for medical imaging and their combination with PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Llosá
- Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), CSIC-UV, Catedrático Beltrán, 2., 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain
| | - Magdalena Rafecas
- Institute of Medical Engineering (IMT), Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiang Z, Sun L, Yao W, Wu QJ, Xiang L, Ren L. 3D in vivodose verification in prostate proton therapy with deep learning-based proton-acoustic imaging. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac9881. [PMID: 36206745 PMCID: PMC9647484 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Dose delivery uncertainty is a major concern in proton therapy, adversely affecting the treatment precision and outcome. Recently, a promising technique, proton-acoustic (PA) imaging, has been developed to provide real-timein vivo3D dose verification. However, its dosimetry accuracy is limited due to the limited-angle view of the ultrasound transducer. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based method to address the limited-view issue in the PA reconstruction. A deep cascaded convolutional neural network (DC-CNN) was proposed to reconstruct 3D high-quality radiation-induced pressures using PA signals detected by a matrix array, and then derive precise 3D dosimetry from pressures for dose verification in proton therapy. To validate its performance, we collected 81 prostate cancer patients' proton therapy treatment plans. Dose was calculated using the commercial software RayStation and was normalized to the maximum dose. The PA simulation was performed using the open-source k-wave package. A matrix ultrasound array with 64 × 64 sensors and 500 kHz central frequency was simulated near the perineum to acquire radiofrequency (RF) signals during dose delivery. For realistic acoustic simulations, tissue heterogeneity and attenuation were considered, and Gaussian white noise was added to the acquired RF signals. The proposed DC-CNN was trained on 204 samples from 69 patients and tested on 26 samples from 12 other patients. Predicted 3D pressures and dose maps were compared against the ground truth qualitatively and quantitatively using root-mean-squared-error (RMSE), gamma-index (GI), and dice coefficient of isodose lines. Results demonstrated that the proposed method considerably improved the limited-view PA image quality, reconstructing pressures with clear and accurate structures and deriving doses with a high agreement with the ground truth. Quantitatively, the pressure accuracy achieved an RMSE of 0.061, and the dose accuracy achieved an RMSE of 0.044, GI (3%/3 mm) of 93.71%, and 90%-isodose line dice of 0.922. The proposed method demonstrates the feasibility of achieving high-quality quantitative 3D dosimetry in PA imaging using a matrix array, which potentially enables the online 3D dose verification for prostate proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuoran Jiang
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Leshan Sun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, USA
| | - Weiguang Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Q. Jackie Wu
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Liangzhong Xiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
- Beckman Laser Institute & Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92612, USA
| | - Lei Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kazemi Kozani M, Magiera A. Machine learning-based event recognition in SiFi Compton camera imaging for proton therapy monitoring. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac71f2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. Online monitoring of dose distribution in proton therapy is currently being investigated with the detection of prompt gamma (PG) radiation emitted from a patient during irradiation. The SiPM and scintillation Fiber based Compton Camera (SiFi-CC) setup is being developed for this aim. Approach. A machine learning approach to recognize Compton events is proposed, reconstructing the PG emission profile during proton therapy. The proposed method was verified on pseudo-data generated by a Geant4 simulation for a single proton beam impinging on a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. Three different models including the boosted decision tree (BDT), multilayer perception (MLP) neural network, and k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation and then their performances were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROI) curves. Subsequently, after event selection by the most robust model, a software based on the List-Mode Maximum Likelihood Estimation Maximization (LM-MLEM) algorithm was applied for the reconstruction of the PG emission distribution profile. Main results. It was demonstrated that the BDT model excels in signal/background separation compared to the other two. Furthermore, the reconstructed PG vertex distribution after event selection showed a significant improvement in distal falloff position determination. Significance. A highly satisfactory agreement between the reconstructed distal edge position and that of the simulated Compton events was achieved. It was also shown that a position resolution of 3.5 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) in distal edge position determination is feasible with the proposed setup.
Collapse
|