Vastus Lateralis Architecture Changes During Pregnancy - A Longitudinal Study

Upper extremity kinematics during walking gait changes through pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Thirty percent of adults in the United States use wearable fitness devices as of 2020 [1], such as fitness watches, to monitor and track health and physical activity parameters. Physical changes during pregnancy may impact wrist worn device accuracy. The arms may be needed as compensation during walking because thorax axial rotation may be inhibited by pelvic tilt during pregnancy [2].

METHODS

To examine arm motion changes, twenty-three pregnant women (28 ± 4 y) were tested in four-week intervals ( ± 2 weeks) at 18-, 22-, 26-, 30- and 34-weeks' gestation. Kinematic data were measured during self-selected speed walking. Segment angles and angular velocities were analyzed over time. Linear regressions were used to analyze the correlations between arm motion and the other kinematic variables.

RESULTS

Arm range of motion significantly increased (p = 0.006) over gestation, but leg, thorax, and pelvis range of motions did not significantly change. Arm range of motion was correlated with pelvis (r² =0.311, p = 0.001, β = 1.724) and leg (r² = 0.285, p = 0.004, β = 1.520) range of motion and gait velocity (r² =0.566, p = 0.001, β = 39.110). Arm velocities significantly increased (p < 0.012), as did leg velocities (p < 0.022) over gestation time, but thorax and pelvis rotational velocities did not significantly change over time. Arm velocity was correlated with leg velocity in both flexion (r² =0.598, p = 0.001, β = 1.61) and extension (r² =0.568, p = 0.001, β = 1.35).

SIGNIFICANCE

Arm swing increases over the course of gestation during walking, which does not follow the exact pattern of changes seen in the legs, thorax, and pelvis. These results show that a typical gait analysis of lower body motions may miss important biomechanical changes or compensations at different points over pregnancy. Future studies should examine why these changes may occur. Studies should also be conducted to see if arm changes impact outcome parameters from fitness watches and affect their validity as an exercise tracker during pregnancy.

Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update

PURPOSE

In 2018, the SARCUS working group published a first article on the standardization of the use of ultrasound to assess muscle. Recommendations were made for patient positioning, system settings and components to be measured. Also, shortcomings in knowledge were mentioned. An important issue that still required standardization was the definition of anatomical landmarks for many muscles.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Sciences looking for all articles describing the use of ultrasound in the assessment of muscle not described in the first recommendations, published from 01/01/2018 until 31/01/2020. All relevant terms used for older people, ultrasound and muscles were used.

RESULTS

For 39 muscles, different approaches for ultrasound assessment were found that likely impact the values measured. Standardized anatomical landmarks and measuring points were proposed for all muscles/muscle groups. Besides the five already known muscle parameters (muscle thickness, cross-section area, pennation angle, fascicle length and echo-intensity), four new parameters are discussed (muscle volume, stiffness, contraction potential and microcirculation). The former SARCUS article recommendations are updated with this new information that includes new muscle groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The emerging field of ultrasound assessment of muscle mass only highlights the need for a standardization of measurement technique. In this article, guidelines are updated and broadened to provide standardization instructions for a large number of muscles.