Meester RGS, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Breekveldt ECH, de Jonge L, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Kooyker A, Nieboer D, Ramakers CR, Spaander MCW, van Vuuren AJ, Kuipers EJ, van Kemenade FJ, Nagtegaal ID, Dekker E, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Faecal occult blood loss accurately predicts future detection of colorectal cancer. A prognostic model.
Gut 2023;
72:101-108. [PMID:
35537811 PMCID:
PMC9763180 DOI:
10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327188]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To examine the prognostic potential of repeated faecal haemoglobin (F-Hb) concentration measurements in faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC).
DESIGN
Prognostic model.
SETTING
Dutch biennial FIT-based screening programme during 2014-2018.
PARTICIPANTS
265 881 participants completing three rounds of FIT, with negative test results (F-Hb <47 µg Hb/g faeces) in rounds 1 and 2.
INTERVENTIONS
Colonoscopy follow-up in participants with a positive FIT (F-Hb ≥47 µg Hb/g faeces).
MAIN OUTCOMES
We evaluated prognostic models for detecting advanced neoplasia (AN) and CRC in round 3, with as predictors, participant age, sex, F-Hb in rounds 1 and 2, and categories/combinations/non-linear transformations of F-Hb. Primary evaluation criteria included: risk prediction accuracy (calibration), discrimination of participants with versus without AN or CRC (optimism-adjusted C-statistics, range 0.5-1.0), the degree of risk stratification and C-statistics in external validation.
RESULTS
Among study participants, 8806 (3.3%) had a positive FIT result, 3254 (1.2%) had AN detected and 557 (0.2%) had cancer. F-Hb concentrations in rounds 1 and 2 were the strongest outcome predictors, with adjusted ORs of up to 9.4 (95% CI 7.5 to 11.7) for the highest F-Hb category. Risk predictions matched the observed risk for most participants (calibration intercept -0.008 to -0.099; slope 0.982-0.998), and discriminated participants with versus without AN or CRC with C-statistics of 0.78 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.79) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.75), respectively. The predicted risk ranged from 0.4% to 36.7% for AN and from 0.0% to 5.5% for CRC across participants. In external validation, the model retained similar discrimination accuracy for AN (C-statistic 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87) and CRC (C-statistic 0.78, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.91).
CONCLUSION
Participants at lower versus higher risk of future AN or CRC can be accurately identified based on their age, sex and particularly, prior F-Hb concentrations. Risk stratification should be considered based on this information.
Collapse