How Soluble Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 1 Could Contribute to Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Preeclampsia?

Preeclampsia and the Retina

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes key findings relating to the association between preeclampsia and retinal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal morbidity. Pregnant women with preeclampsia frequently describe having visual disturbances. Retinal changes can be identified on fundoscopy in most patients with preeclampsia. While retinal pathology secondary to preeclampsia usually resolves postpartum, there is growing evidence that women with preeclampsia have a higher long-term risk of developing retinal disorders after pregnancy. Pregnant women often experience visual changes. While these symptoms may be benign, careful attention should be paid to exclude retinal disorders secondary to preeclampsia. Pregnant women complaining of new-onset or worsening blurry vision, scotomata, diplopia, or photopsia require rapid and thorough evaluation to rule out hypertensive disorders. Management of preeclampsia, including administration of magnesium sulfate and delivery of the fetus, can reverse retinal pathologies in most cases.

One-third of patients with eclampsia at term do not have an abnormal angiogenic profile

OBJECTIVES

An abnormal angiogenic profile is present in about one-half of women with preeclampsia at term. Few studies examined the roles of angiogenic biomarkers in eclampsia. The aims of this study were to determine (1) whether the degree of an anti-angiogenic state, reflected by a low placental growth factor (PlGF) to soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) ratio, in women with eclampsia differed from that of women with severe preeclampsia; and (2) the prevalence of women who had an abnormal angiogenic profile at the diagnoses of preterm and term eclampsia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted to include women in the following groups: (1) uncomplicated pregnancy (n=40); (2) severe preeclampsia (n=50); and (3) eclampsia (n=35). Maternal serum concentrations of PlGF and sFlt-1 were determined by immunoassays.

RESULTS

Women with preterm, but not term, eclampsia had a more severe anti-angiogenic state than those with severe preeclampsia (lower PlGF and PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio, each p<0.05). However, the difference diminished in magnitude with increasing gestational age (interaction, p=0.005). An abnormal angiogenic profile was present in 95% (19/20) of women with preterm eclampsia but in only 67% (10/15) of women with eclampsia at term.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiogenic biomarkers can be used for risk assessment of preterm eclampsia. By contrast, a normal profile of angiogenic biomarkers cannot reliably exclude patients at risk for eclampsia at term. This observation has major clinical implications given that angiogenic biomarkers are frequently used in the triage area as a test to rule out preeclampsia.