1
|
Elforaici MEA, Montagnon E, Romero FP, Le WT, Azzi F, Trudel D, Nguyen B, Turcotte S, Tang A, Kadoury S. Semi-supervised ViT knowledge distillation network with style transfer normalization for colorectal liver metastases survival prediction. Med Image Anal 2024; 99:103346. [PMID: 39423564 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal liver metastases (CLM) affect almost half of all colon cancer patients and the response to systemic chemotherapy plays a crucial role in patient survival. While oncologists typically use tumor grading scores, such as tumor regression grade (TRG), to establish an accurate prognosis on patient outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and time-to-recurrence (TTR), these traditional methods have several limitations. They are subjective, time-consuming, and require extensive expertise, which limits their scalability and reliability. Additionally, existing approaches for prognosis prediction using machine learning mostly rely on radiological imaging data, but recently histological images have been shown to be relevant for survival predictions by allowing to fully capture the complex microenvironmental and cellular characteristics of the tumor. To address these limitations, we propose an end-to-end approach for automated prognosis prediction using histology slides stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and Hematoxylin Phloxine Saffron (HPS). We first employ a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) for slide normalization to reduce staining variations and improve the overall quality of the images that are used as input to our prediction pipeline. We propose a semi-supervised model to perform tissue classification from sparse annotations, producing segmentation and feature maps. Specifically, we use an attention-based approach that weighs the importance of different slide regions in producing the final classification results. Finally, we exploit the extracted features for the metastatic nodules and surrounding tissue to train a prognosis model. In parallel, we train a vision Transformer model in a knowledge distillation framework to replicate and enhance the performance of the prognosis prediction. We evaluate our approach on an in-house clinical dataset of 258 CLM patients, achieving superior performance compared to other comparative models with a c-index of 0.804 (0.014) for OS and 0.735 (0.016) for TTR, as well as on two public datasets. The proposed approach achieves an accuracy of 86.9% to 90.3% in predicting TRG dichotomization. For the 3-class TRG classification task, the proposed approach yields an accuracy of 78.5% to 82.1%, outperforming the comparative methods. Our proposed pipeline can provide automated prognosis for pathologists and oncologists, and can greatly promote precision medicine progress in managing CLM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed El Amine Elforaici
- MedICAL Laboratory, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.
| | | | - Francisco Perdigón Romero
- MedICAL Laboratory, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - William Trung Le
- MedICAL Laboratory, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Feryel Azzi
- Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Dominique Trudel
- Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada; Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Simon Turcotte
- Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada; Department of surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - An Tang
- Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada; Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- MedICAL Laboratory, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada; Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bull JA, Mulholland EJ, Leedham SJ, Byrne HM. Extended correlation functions for spatial analysis of multiplex imaging data. BIOLOGICAL IMAGING 2024; 4:e2. [PMID: 38516631 PMCID: PMC10951806 DOI: 10.1017/s2633903x24000011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Imaging platforms for generating highly multiplexed histological images are being continually developed and improved. Significant improvements have also been made in the accuracy of methods for automated cell segmentation and classification. However, less attention has focused on the quantification and analysis of the resulting point clouds, which describe the spatial coordinates of individual cells. We focus here on a particular spatial statistical method, the cross-pair correlation function (cross-PCF), which can identify positive and negative spatial correlation between cells across a range of length scales. However, limitations of the cross-PCF hinder its widespread application to multiplexed histology. For example, it can only consider relations between pairs of cells, and cells must be classified using discrete categorical labels (rather than labeling continuous labels such as stain intensity). In this paper, we present three extensions to the cross-PCF which address these limitations and permit more detailed analysis of multiplex images: topographical correlation maps can visualize local clustering and exclusion between cells; neighbourhood correlation functions can identify colocalization of two or more cell types; and weighted-PCFs describe spatial correlation between points with continuous (rather than discrete) labels. We apply the extended PCFs to synthetic and biological datasets in order to demonstrate the insight that they can generate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A. Bull
- Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, OxfordOX2 6GG, UK
| | - Eoghan J. Mulholland
- Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 7BN, UK
| | - Simon J. Leedham
- Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 7BN, UK
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 9DU, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 9DU, UK
| | - Helen M. Byrne
- Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, OxfordOX2 6GG, UK
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 7DQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schicktanz S, Welsch J, Schweda M, Hein A, Rieger JW, Kirste T. AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies. Front Genet 2023; 14:1039839. [PMID: 37434952 PMCID: PMC10331421 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical values seen as relevant for the design and development of assistive technology, and third, by promoting AI technology to use moral reasoning as part of the automation process. The dominance of these three perspectives in the discourse is demonstrated by a brief summary of the literature. Subsequently, we propose a fourth approach to AI, namely, as a methodological tool to assist ethical reflection. We provide a concept of an AI-simulation informed by three separate elements: 1) stochastic human behavior models based on behavioral data for simulating realistic settings, 2) qualitative empirical data on value statements regarding internal policy, and 3) visualization components that aid in understanding the impact of changes in these variables. The potential of this approach is to inform an interdisciplinary field about anticipated ethical challenges or ethical trade-offs in concrete settings and, hence, to spark a re-evaluation of design and implementation plans. This may be particularly useful for applications that deal with extremely complex values and behavior or with limitations on the communication resources of affected persons (e.g., persons with dementia care or for care of persons with cognitive impairment). Simulation does not replace ethical reflection but does allow for detailed, context-sensitive analysis during the design process and prior to implementation. Finally, we discuss the inherently quantitative methods of analysis afforded by stochastic simulations as well as the potential for ethical discussions and how simulations with AI can improve traditional forms of thought experiments and future-oriented technology assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Schicktanz
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Department for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg, Institute of Advance Studies, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Johannes Welsch
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Department for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Mark Schweda
- University of Oldenburg, Department of Health Services Research, Division for Ethics in Medicine, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Hein
- University of Oldenburg, Department of Health Services Research, Division Assistance Systems and Medical Device Technology, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Jochem W. Rieger
- University of Oldenburg, Applied Neurocognitive Psychology Lab, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirste
- University of Rostock, Institute for Visual and Analytic Computing, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schweizer L, Seegerer P, Kim HY, Saitenmacher R, Muench A, Barnick L, Osterloh A, Dittmayer C, Jödicke R, Pehl D, Reinhardt A, Ruprecht K, Stenzel W, Wefers AK, Harter PN, Schüller U, Heppner FL, Alber M, Müller KR, Klauschen F. Analysing cerebrospinal fluid with explainable deep learning: From diagnostics to insights. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2023; 49:e12866. [PMID: 36519297 DOI: 10.1111/nan.12866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is essential for diagnostic workup of patients with neurological diseases and includes differential cell typing. The current gold standard is based on microscopic examination by specialised technicians and neuropathologists, which is time-consuming, labour-intensive and subjective. METHODS We, therefore, developed an image analysis approach based on expert annotations of 123,181 digitised CSF objects from 78 patients corresponding to 15 clinically relevant categories and trained a multiclass convolutional neural network (CNN). RESULTS The CNN classified the 15 categories with high accuracy (mean AUC 97.3%). By using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), we demonstrate that the CNN identified meaningful cellular substructures in CSF cells recapitulating human pattern recognition. Based on the evaluation of 511 cells selected from 12 different CSF samples, we validated the CNN by comparing it with seven board-certified neuropathologists blinded for clinical information. Inter-rater agreement between the CNN and the ground truth was non-inferior (Krippendorff's alpha 0.79) compared with the agreement of seven human raters and the ground truth (mean Krippendorff's alpha 0.72, range 0.56-0.81). The CNN assigned the correct diagnostic label (inflammatory, haemorrhagic or neoplastic) in 10 out of 11 clinical samples, compared with 7-11 out of 11 by human raters. CONCLUSIONS Our approach provides the basis to overcome current limitations in automated cell classification for routine diagnostics and demonstrates how a visual explanation framework can connect machine decision-making with cell properties and thus provide a novel versatile and quantitative method for investigating CSF manifestations of various neurological diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonille Schweizer
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Seegerer
- Machine-Learning Group, Department of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Aignostics GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hee-Yeong Kim
- Systems Medicine of Infectious Disease, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - René Saitenmacher
- Machine-Learning Group, Department of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Amos Muench
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Liane Barnick
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anja Osterloh
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Dittmayer
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ruben Jödicke
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Debora Pehl
- Department of Pathology, Vivantes Hospitals Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Klemens Ruprecht
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Werner Stenzel
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika K Wefers
- Institute of NeuropathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick N Harter
- Neurological Institute (Edinger Institute), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Schüller
- Institute of NeuropathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Research Institute Children's Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Frank L Heppner
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence, NeuroCure, Berlin, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maximilian Alber
- Aignostics GmbH, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus-Robert Müller
- Machine-Learning Group, Department of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Max Planck Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany.,Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data (BIFOLD), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Frederick Klauschen
- Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data (BIFOLD), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bankhead P. Developing image analysis methods for digital pathology. J Pathol 2022; 257:391-402. [PMID: 35481680 PMCID: PMC9324951 DOI: 10.1002/path.5921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
The potential to use quantitative image analysis and artificial intelligence is one of the driving forces behind digital pathology. However, despite novel image analysis methods for pathology being described across many publications, few become widely adopted and many are not applied in more than a single study. The explanation is often straightforward: software implementing the method is simply not available, or is too complex, incomplete, or dataset‐dependent for others to use. The result is a disconnect between what seems already possible in digital pathology based upon the literature, and what actually is possible for anyone wishing to apply it using currently available software. This review begins by introducing the main approaches and techniques involved in analysing pathology images. I then examine the practical challenges inherent in taking algorithms beyond proof‐of‐concept, from both a user and developer perspective. I describe the need for a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to developing and validating meaningful new algorithms, and argue that openness, implementation, and usability deserve more attention among digital pathology researchers. The review ends with a discussion about how digital pathology could benefit from interacting with and learning from the wider bioimage analysis community, particularly with regard to sharing data, software, and ideas. © 2022 The Author. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bankhead
- Edinburgh Pathology, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Genomic & Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|