Letrozole cotreatment with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF treatment

The Efficacy of Letrozole Co-Treatment in an Antagonist Protocol for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Undergoing IVF: A Retrospective Study

Objective

Our objective was to investigate the efficacy of letrozole co-treatment in an antagonist protocol for infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study included infertile women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI with and without letrozole co-treatment in an antagonist protocol from 2007-2021 at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China). A total of 1559 participants were enrolled, with 1227 women in the antagonist group and 332 women in the letrozole co-treatment group. Propensity score-based patient-matching model was conducted to balance covariates between the groups. The primary outcome was the number of retrieved oocytes, with secondary outcomes including endocrine parameters, ovarian stimulation outcomes, pregnancy outcomes, and obstetrical and neonatal complications.

Results

Letrozole co-treatment induced significant changes in hormonal regulation, increased the percentage of large follicles, and resulted in fewer retrieved oocytes (P < 0.05). However, there was no negative impact on the number of usable embryos or good-quality embryos (P > 0.05). The live birth rates following fresh embryo transfer were comparable between the letrozole and control groups (single embryo transfer: 28.9% vs 29.7%, P > 0.05; double embryo transfer: 37.3% vs 45.6%, P > 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the live birth rate per patient after frozen embryo transfer and the cumulative live birth rate (P > 0.05). No significant differences in obstetrical and neonatal complications were observed between the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The addition of letrozole to the antagonist protocol for women with PCOS undergoing IVF induces a higher percentage of large follicles during oocyte retrieval, while reducing the overall number of retrieved oocytes. Moreover, the use of letrozole demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes following embryo transfers. These findings highlight the potential application of letrozole in an antagonist protocol for women with PCOS.

Letrozole cotreatment progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization

AIM

To investigate the impact of letrozole cotreatment progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) (Le PPOS) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and the pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 2575 cycles were included (1675 in the Le PPOS group and 900 in the PPOS group). The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rates. The secondary outcome was the live birth rates.

RESULTS

In this study, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to create a perfect match of 379 patients in each group. After matching, the numbers of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, fertilization, and clinical pregnancy rates were more favorable in the Le PPOS group than in the PPOS group (all p < 0.05). The multivariable analysis showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the Le PPOS than in the PPOS group (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.04, p = 0.024) after adjusting for potentially confounding factors (age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicular count, the type of embryo transferred, number of transferred embryos, body mass index, and follicular stimulating hormone and estradiol levels on starting day).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study with a limited sample size suggests that the Le PPOS protocol might be an alternative to the PPOS protocol in women undergoing COS and could lead to better pregnancy outcomes. The results should be confirmed using a formal randomized controlled trial.

The comparison between fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate combined with letrozole in patients of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol: a propensity score-matched study

Objective

To explore the cycle characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) using fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in conjunction with letrozole (LE) in infertile women by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

Population

A total of 3173 infertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment within the period from January 2017 to December 2020.

Methods

A total of 1068 and 783 patients who underwent a fixed dose of MPA combined with LE and a degressive dose of MPA combined with LE protocols, respectively, were enrolled in this study. The freeze-all approach and later frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) were performed in both groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcomes were the dosage of MPA and the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges. The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the fetal malformation rate.

Results

We created a perfect match of 478 patients in each group. The dosage of MPA, the LH serum level on the eighth day of stimulation, progesterone (P) level and LH level on the hCG trigger day were significantly higher in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (52.1 ± 13.1 mg vs. 44.9 ± 12.5 mg; 5.0 ± 2.7 IU/L vs. 3.7 ± 1.7 IU/L; 0.9 ± 0.5 ng/ml vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 ng/ml; 3.3 ± 2.4 IU/L vs. 2.8 ± 1.9 IU/L; P < 0.01). The duration of Gn, the number of follicles with diameter more than 16 mm on trigger day, the estradiol (E2) level on the hCG trigger day were lower in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (9.7 ± 1.7 days vs. 10.3 ± 1.5 days; 5.6 ± 3.0 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0; 1752.5 ± 1120.8 pg/ml vs. 1997.2 ± 1108.5 pg/ml; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of premature LH surge, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of top-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), CLBR or fetal malformation rate between the two groups.

Conclusion

The combination of a degressive MPA dose with LE proved effective in reducing the total MPA dosage with comparable premature LH surge and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing the PPOS protocol.

Comparison the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in infertility patients with normal ovarian reserve function undergoing invitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 2013 cycles of patients with normal ovarian reserve function who underwent invitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) in the Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine from January 2018 and June 2020. The PPOS protocol group included 679 cycles and GnRH-along protocol group included 1334 cycles, the pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The duration of Gn used and total Gn used dosage in the PPOS protocol group were less than those in the GnRH-along protocol group (Duration of Gn used: 10.05 ± 1.48 vs 11.90 ± 1.85 d, p < 0.001; Total Gn used dosage: 1944.49 ± 533.61 vs 2661.34 ± 987.97 IU, p < 0.001); The LH levels were significantly higher on HCG trigger day in PPOS protocol compared to GnRH-a long protocol (2.8 ± 1 ± 1.07 vs 1.01 ± 0.62 IU/L, p < 0.001), the E2 levels on HCG trigger day in PPOS protocol group was lower than that in the GnRH-a long protocol group (2135.92 ± 1387.00 vs 2417.01 ± 1010.70 pg/mL, p < 0. 001). The number of oocytes retrieved in the PPOS protocol group was lower than that in the GnRH-along protocol group (8.03 ± 2.86 vs 9.47 ± 2.64, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in pregnancy outcome including clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between the two group (p > 0.05); In addition, no severe OHSS occurred in the PPOS protocol group during ovulation induction, while 11 patients of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred in GnRH-a long protocol group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The clinical efficacy of PPOS protocol combining embryo cryopreservation is comparable to that of GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function, and the PPOS protocol is able to reduce the incidence of severe OHSS significantly.