What Matters for C4 Transporters: Evolutionary Changes of Phosphoenolpyruvate Transporter for C4 Photosynthesis

Sugar sensing in C4 source leaves: a gap that needs to be filled

Plant growth depends on sugar production and export by photosynthesizing source leaves and sugar allocation and import by sink tissues (grains, roots, stems, and young leaves). Photosynthesis and sink demand are tightly coordinated through metabolic (substrate, allosteric) feedback and signalling (sugar, hormones) mechanisms. Sugar signalling integrates sugar production with plant development and environmental cues. In C3 plants (e.g. wheat and rice), it is well documented that sugar accumulation in source leaves, due to source-sink imbalance, negatively feeds back on photosynthesis and plant productivity. However, we have a limited understanding about the molecular mechanisms underlying those feedback regulations, especially in C4 plants (e.g. maize, sorghum, and sugarcane). Recent work with the C4 model plant Setaria viridis suggested that C4 leaves have different sugar sensing thresholds and behaviours relative to C3 counterparts. Addressing this research priority is critical because improving crop yield requires a better understanding of how plants coordinate source activity with sink demand. Here we review the literature, present a model of action for sugar sensing in C4 source leaves, and suggest ways forward.

Genome-wide identification and comparative analyses of key genes involved in C4 photosynthesis in five main gramineous crops

Compared to C₃ species, C₄ plants showed higher photosynthetic capacity as well as water and nitrogen use efficiency due to the presence of the C₄ photosynthetic pathway. Previous studies have shown that all genes required for the C₄ photosynthetic pathway exist in the genomes of C₃ species and are expressed. In this study, the genes encoding six key C₄ photosynthetic pathway enzymes (β-CA, PEPC, ME, MDH, RbcS, and PPDK) in the genomes of five important gramineous crops (C₄: maize, foxtail millet, and sorghum; C₃: rice and wheat) were systematically identified and compared. Based on sequence characteristics and evolutionary relationships, their C₄ functional gene copies were distinguished from non-photosynthetic functional gene copies. Furthermore, multiple sequence alignment revealed important sites affecting the activities of PEPC and RbcS between the C₃ and C₄ species. Comparisons of expression characteristics confirmed that the expression patterns of non-photosynthetic gene copies were relatively conserved among species, while C₄ gene copies in C₄ species acquired new tissue expression patterns during evolution. Additionally, multiple sequence features that may affect C₄ gene expression and subcellular localization were found in the coding and promoter regions. Our work emphasized the diversity of the evolution of different genes in the C₄ photosynthetic pathway and confirmed that the specific high expression in the leaf and appropriate intracellular distribution were the keys to the evolution of C₄ photosynthesis. The results of this study will help determine the evolutionary mechanism of the C₄ photosynthetic pathway in Gramineae and provide references for the transformation of C₄ photosynthetic pathways in wheat, rice, and other major C₃ cereal crops.

Evolution of gene regulatory network of C4 photosynthesis in the genus Flaveria reveals the evolutionary status of C3-C4 intermediate species

C₄ photosynthesis evolved from ancestral C₃ photosynthesis by recruiting pre-existing genes to fulfill new functions. The enzymes and transporters required for the C₄ metabolic pathway have been intensively studied and well documented; however, the transcription factors (TFs) that regulate these C₄ metabolic genes are not yet well understood. In particular, how the TF regulatory network of C₄ metabolic genes was rewired during the evolutionary process is unclear. Here, we constructed gene regulatory networks (GRNs) for four closely evolutionarily related species from the genus Flaveria, which represent four different evolutionary stages of C₄ photosynthesis: C₃ (F. robusta), type I C₃-C₄ (F. sonorensis), type II C₃-C₄ (F. ramosissima), and C₄ (F. trinervia). Our results show that more than half of the co-regulatory relationships between TFs and core C₄ metabolic genes are species specific. The counterparts of the C₄ genes in C₃ species were already co-regulated with photosynthesis-related genes, whereas the required TFs for C₄ photosynthesis were recruited later. The TFs involved in C₄ photosynthesis were widely recruited in the type I C₃-C₄ species; nevertheless, type II C₃-C₄ species showed a divergent GRN from C₄ species. In line with these findings, a ¹³CO₂ pulse-labeling experiment showed that the CO₂ initially fixed into C₄ acid was not directly released to the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle in the type II C₃-C₄ species. Therefore, our study uncovered dynamic changes in C₄ genes and TF co-regulation during the evolutionary process; furthermore, we showed that the metabolic pathway of the type II C₃-C₄ species F. ramosissima represents an alternative evolutionary solution to the ammonia imbalance in C₃-C₄ intermediate species.

Transport Proteins Enabling Plant Photorespiratory Metabolism

Photorespiration (PR) is a metabolic repair pathway that acts in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms to degrade a toxic product of oxygen fixation generated by the enzyme ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Within the metabolic pathway, energy is consumed and carbon dioxide released. Consequently, PR is seen as a wasteful process making it a promising target for engineering to enhance plant productivity. Transport and channel proteins connect the organelles accomplishing the PR pathway-chloroplast, peroxisome, and mitochondrion-and thus enable efficient flux of PR metabolites. Although the pathway and the enzymes catalyzing the biochemical reactions have been the focus of research for the last several decades, the knowledge about transport proteins involved in PR is still limited. This review presents a timely state of knowledge with regard to metabolite channeling in PR and the participating proteins. The significance of transporters for implementation of synthetic bypasses to PR is highlighted. As an excursion, the physiological contribution of transport proteins that are involved in C₄ metabolism is discussed.