Response: Commentary: The Developmental Trajectory of the Operational Momentum Effect

Operational momentum during children's approximate arithmetic relates to symbolic math skills and space-magnitude association

Operational momentum (OM) refers to the behavioral tendency to overestimate or underestimate the results of addition or subtraction, respectively. The cognitive mechanism of the OM effect and how it is related to the development of symbolic math abilities are not well understood. The current study examined whether individual differences in the OM effect are related to symbolic arithmetic abilities, number line estimation performance, and the space-magnitude association effect in young children. In this study, first-grade elementary school children manifested the OM effect during approximate addition and subtraction. Individual differences in the OM effect were not correlated with number line estimation error. Interestingly, children who showed a greater degree of the OM effect performed not worse, but better on the symbolic arithmetic task. In addition, the OM effect was correlated with the space-magnitude association (size congruity) effect measured with the Numerical Stroop task. More specifically, the OM bias was correlated with the ability to inhibit interference from competing information on the incongruent trials of the Numerical Stroop task. Our results suggest that the inaccuracy of numerical magnitude representations is not the source of the OM effect. Given that children with better math ability showed a greater OM bias, a stronger OM effect may reflect better intuition in arithmetic operations. Altogether, we carefully interpret these findings as suggesting that a greater OM effect reflects superior intuition or fundamental knowledge of arithmetic operations and a more adult-like maturation of the reorienting component of the attentional system.

Range and distribution effects on number line placement

People's placement of numbers on number lines sometimes shows linear and sometimes compressive scaling. We investigated whether people's placement of numbers was affected by their range and distribution, as indicated by Parducci's (Psychological Review, 72, 407-418, 1965) range-frequency theory. Experiment 1 found large compressive effects when the endpoints were 1 and 10¹⁶. Experiment 2 showed compression when 14 logarithmically distributed numbers were placed on a line marked 1-1,000 and close to linear scaling when the numbers were linearly distributed. Thus, we found both range and frequency effects on compression. Where compression arose, it was not as pronounced as that predicted by logarithmic scaling, but analyses of the results from Experiments 1 and 2 indicate this was not explained by participants switching between linear and logarithmic scaling.