1
|
Lolita L, Ikhsanudin A. Illness Risk Perceptions and Efficacy Beliefs Among Indonesian in the Course of COVID-19 Pandemic. BORNEO JOURNAL OF PHARMACY 2022. [DOI: 10.33084/bjop.v5i4.3287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19, a worldwide pandemic, has posed a significant challenge to public health systems worldwide. Health risk perception and efficacy belief are primary constructs influencing individuals' protective behavior due to the outbreak. Our study investigated each item of illness risk perception, efficacy belief, and its related factors concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 227 respondents aged 17 to 70. Data collection was conducted using convenience sampling by distributing the web questionnaire between April and July 2020. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis bivariate analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 to assess the relationship between individual characteristic factors, illness risk perception, and efficacy belief. The study established that respondents had a medium to a high level of illness risk perception and a reasonable efficacy belief in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. Region (p=0.027) and occupation (p=0.036) differences were significantly associated with the threat and severity perception, respectively. Smoking history (p=0.037), supplement use (p=0.029), and occupation (p=0.018) differences were significantly associated with self-efficacy. Meanwhile, gender (p=0.045) differences were significantly associated with response efficacy. Therefore, the public's illness risk perception and efficacy belief could be substantial in planning, modifying, and implementing a coordinated response for risk communication in current and future epidemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lolita Lolita
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tarr GAM, Morris KJ, Harding AB, Jacobs S, Smith MK, Church TR, Berman JD, Rau A, Ashida S, Ramirez MR. Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267261. [PMID: 35503754 PMCID: PMC9064111 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Even early in the COVID-19 pandemic, adherence to physical distancing measures was variable, exposing some communities to elevated risk. While cognitive factors from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and resilience correlate with compliance with physical distancing, external conditions may preclude full compliance with physical distancing guidelines. Our objective was to identify HBM and resilience constructs that could be used to improve adherence to physical distancing even when full compliance is not possible. We examined adherence as expressed through 7-day non-work, non-household contact rates in two cohorts: 1) adults in households with children from Minnesota and Iowa; and 2) adults ≥50 years-old from Minnesota, one-third of whom had Parkinson's disease. We identified multiple cognitive factors associated with physical distancing adherence, specifically perceived severity, benefits, self-efficacy, and barriers. However, the magnitude, and occasionally the direction, of these associations was population-dependent. In Cohort 1, perceived self-efficacy for remaining 6-feet from others was associated with a 29% lower contact rate (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.65, 0.77). This finding was consistent across all race/ethnicity and income groups we examined. The barriers to adherence of having a child in childcare and having financial concerns had the largest effects among individuals from marginalized racial and ethnic groups and high-income households. In Cohort 2, self-efficacy to quarantine/isolate was associated with a 23% decrease in contacts (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66, 0.89), but upon stratification by education level, the association was only present for those with at least a Bachelor's degree. Education also modified the effect of the barrier to adherence leaving home for work, increasing contacts among those with a Bachelor's degree and reducing contacts among those without. Our findings suggest that public health messaging tailored to the identified cognitive factors has the potential to improve physical distancing adherence, but population-specific needs must be considered to maximize effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian A. M. Tarr
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Keeley J. Morris
- Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Alyson B. Harding
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Samuel Jacobs
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - M. Kumi Smith
- Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Timothy R. Church
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Jesse D. Berman
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Austin Rau
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Sato Ashida
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - Marizen R. Ramirez
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|