1
|
Cespedes P, Martínez-Arnau FM, Torregrosa MD, Cauli O, Buigues C. Impact of a Physical Exercise and Health Education Program on Metabolic Syndrome and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Women Undergoing Adjuvant Treatment with Aromatase Inhibitors. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1893. [PMID: 39597078 PMCID: PMC11596674 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2024] [Revised: 11/08/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in breast cancer (BC) survivors can cause adverse effects such as metabolic syndrome (MS) (insulin resistance, central obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and hypertension) associated with morbidity and premature mortality. We evaluate the effect of a multimodal program based on physical exercise and health education on MS and health-related quality of life (QoL) in postmenopausal women with BC under AIs. Methods: A total of 56 postmenopausal women, diagnosed with BC, aged 60 years or older (mean age 67.2 years) and on hormonal treatment with AIs, were included in the multimodal physical exercise and health education program, and evaluated before and after their participation. The assessment of the five criteria of the MS included the following: waist circumference, high blood pressure, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Two main instruments were used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on QoL: the EORTC QLQ C30 (questionnaire for cancers in general) and the EORTC QLQ BR23 (specifically for breast cancer patients). The EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) was also used to compare these results. Results: The percentage of women meeting the MS criteria was 37.7% at baseline and fell to 15.1% at 3 months after the intervention (p = 0.02). The intervention significantly reduced hypertension (p < 0.001), central obesity (p < 0.001), and the concentration of triglycerides (p = 0.016). No significant changes were observed in fasting glucose and HDL concentration. A statistically significant improvement was found in QoL (on both the QLQ30 and BR23 scales). A multivariate regression model analysis identified marital status (being married) (95% CI: 1.728-131.615, p = 0.014), and percentage of attendance at health education sessions (95% CI: 1.010-1.211, p = 0.029) as positive predictive variables of improvement in MS. Conclusions: The implementation of multimodal, community-based programs of physical exercise and health education improve the prevalence of MS and specific criteria of MS and QoL in postmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving AI treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Cespedes
- Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (P.C.); (C.B.)
| | - Francisco M. Martínez-Arnau
- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain;
- Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Research Group (FROG), University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Chair of Healthy, Active and Participative Aging, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Omar Cauli
- Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (P.C.); (C.B.)
- Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Research Group (FROG), University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Chair of Healthy, Active and Participative Aging, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Cristina Buigues
- Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (P.C.); (C.B.)
- Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Research Group (FROG), University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Chair of Healthy, Active and Participative Aging, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
von Au A, Dannehl D, Dijkstra TMH, Gutsfeld R, Scholz AS, Hassdenteufel K, Hahn M, Hawighorst-Knapstein S, Isaksson A, Chaudhuri A, Bauer A, Wallwiener M, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Hartkopf AD, Wallwiener S. Breast Cancer and Mental Health: Incidence and Influencing Factors-A Claims Data Analysis from Germany. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3688. [PMID: 39518126 PMCID: PMC11545012 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES With breast cancer (BC) survival improving due to optimized therapy, enhancing quality of life has become increasingly important. Both diagnosis and treatment, with their potential side effects, pose risks to mental well-being. Our study aimed to analyze the incidence and potential risk factors for mental disorders in BC patients. METHODS This retrospective analysis used claims data from AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, including 11,553 BC patients diagnosed via ICD code C50 between 2010 and 2020 and 31,944 age-matched controls. Patients with mental disorders in the 12 months prior to diagnosis were excluded. Mental disorders were categorized into eight groups based on ICD codes: anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, adjustment disorder, dissociative disorder, hypochondriac disorder, affective disorder, mania, and other neuroses. RESULTS Mental disorders were significantly more common in BC patients than in controls (64.2% vs. 38.1%, p < 0.01, OR 2.91, 95%CI [2.79, 3.04]). In particular, hypochondriac, anxiety, affective, and adjustment disorders occurred significantly more often in BC patients. No differences were found for mania, bipolar disease, other neuroses, obsessive compulsive-, or dissociative disorders. Furthermore, endocrine therapy was associated with psychological comorbidities (OR 1.69, p < 0.001, 95%CI [1.53, 1.86]), while primarily metastasized patients (stage C) had a lower risk than adjuvant patients in stage A (OR 0.55, p < 0.0001, 95%CI [0.49, 0.61]). Regarding surgical treatment, mastectomy patients showed lower rates of mental illnesses (61.2%) than those with breast-conserving treatment (71.6%), or especially breast reconstruction (78.4%, p < 0.01). Breast reconstruction was also associated with more hypochondriac (p < 0.01) and adjustment disorders (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS So, BC patients experience significantly more mental disorders than controls, particularly when treated with endocrine therapy and breast reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra von Au
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.S.S.); (K.H.)
| | - Dominik Dannehl
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
| | - Tjeerd Maarten Hein Dijkstra
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
- Institute for Translational Bioinformatics, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Raphael Gutsfeld
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
| | - Anna Sophie Scholz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.S.S.); (K.H.)
| | - Kathrin Hassdenteufel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.S.S.); (K.H.)
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
| | | | - Alexandra Isaksson
- AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, 70188 Stuttgart, Germany; (S.H.-K.); (A.I.); (A.C.)
| | - Ariane Chaudhuri
- AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, 70188 Stuttgart, Germany; (S.H.-K.); (A.I.); (A.C.)
| | - Armin Bauer
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
| | | | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
| | - Sara Yvonne Brucker
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
| | - Andreas Daniel Hartkopf
- Department of Women’s Health, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (D.D.); (T.M.H.D.); (R.G.); (M.H.); (A.B.); (D.W.); (S.Y.B.); (A.D.H.)
| | - Stephanie Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, Halle University, 06120 Halle, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Claes M, Tuts L, Robijns J, Mulders K, Van De Werf E, Bulens P, Mebis J. Cancer therapy-related vaginal toxicity: its prevalence and assessment methods-a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01553-y. [PMID: 38383907 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01553-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In 2020, almost 9 million women were diagnosed with cancer worldwide. Despite advancements in cancer treatment strategies, patients still suffer from acute and long-term side effects. This systematic review aims to evaluate the most frequently reported adverse effects in the genitourinary system and compare them across cancer types, treatment modalities, and evaluation methods. METHODS Pubmed Central, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to identify all prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials assessing vaginal side effects of adult female cancer patients. The study quality was evaluated using The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Risk of Bias 2 tool, as appropriate. RESULTS The most prevalent population was breast cancer patients, followed by gynaecological cancer patients. Overall, the focus was on vaginal dryness, while vaginal stenosis was the primary outcome in gynaecological cancer patients. Significant discrepancies were found in the frequency and severity of the reported adverse events. Most studies in this review evaluated side effects using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). CONCLUSIONS Genitourinary syndrome of menopause following cancer treatment is most frequently documented in breast and gynaecological cancer patients, often focussing on vaginal dryness and vaginal stenosis based on PROMs. This review provides a complete overview of the literature, but more high-quality clinical trials are necessary to draw firm conclusions on acute and chronic vaginal toxicity following cancer treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This review could help improve the current preventive and curative management options for genitourinary complications, thereby increasing the patient's QoL and sexual functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marithé Claes
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
- LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium.
- Dept. Medical Oncology, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
- Dept. Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - L Tuts
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Medical Oncology, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - J Robijns
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Medical Oncology, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - K Mulders
- LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Medical Oncology, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - E Van De Werf
- LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Radiation Oncology, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Radiation Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Synaps Park 1, 3600, Genk, Belgium
- Dept. Future Health, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Synaps Park 1, 3600, Genk, Belgium
| | - P Bulens
- LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Radiation Oncology, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Radiation Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Synaps Park 1, 3600, Genk, Belgium
- Dept. Future Health, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Synaps Park 1, 3600, Genk, Belgium
| | - J Mebis
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- LCRC, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Medical Oncology, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Dept. Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Salvatorstraat 20, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|