1
|
Roson Rodriguez P, Chen X, Arancibia M, Garegnani L, Escobar Liquitay CM, Mohammad HA, Franco JV. Transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 8:CD009788. [PMID: 39212182 PMCID: PMC11363221 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009788.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia is a chronic mental illness characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and important functional and social disability. Interventions labeled as 'transitional' add to care plans made during the hospital stay in preparation for discharge. They also include interventions developed after discharge to support people with serious mental illness as they make the transition from the hospital to the community. Transitional discharge interventions may anticipate the future needs of the patient after discharge by co-ordinating the different levels of the health system that can effectively guarantee continuity of care in the community. This occurs through the provision of therapeutic relationships which give a safety net throughout the discharge and community reintegration processes to improve the general condition of users, level of functioning, use of health resources, and satisfaction with care. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia. SEARCH METHODS On 7 December 2022, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of transitional discharge interventions in people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-related disorders. Eligible interventions included three key elements: predischarge planning, co-ordination of care and follow-up, and postdischarge support. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Outcomes of this review included global state (relapse), service use (hospitalization), general functioning, satisfaction with care, adverse effects/events, quality of life, and direct costs. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% CIs. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS We found 12 studies with 1748 participants comparing transitional discharge interventions to usual care. All were parallel-group RCTs. No studies assessed global state (relapse) or reported data about adverse events/effects. All studies had a high risk of bias, mainly due to serious concerns about allocation concealment, deviations from intended interventions, measurement of the outcomes, and missing outcome data. Transitional discharge interventions may make little to no difference in service use (hospitalization) at short- and long-term follow-ups, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.50; I2 = 54%; 4 studies, 462 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Transitional discharge intervention may increase the levels of functioning after discharge (clinically important change in general functioning) (SMD 0.95, 95% CI -0.06 to 1.97; I² = 95%; 4 studies, 437 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and may increase the proportion of participants who are satisfied with the intervention (clinically important change in satisfaction) (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.80; 1 study, 76 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but for both outcomes the evidence is very uncertain. Transitional discharge intervention may make little to no difference in quality of life compared to treatment as usual (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.78; I² = 90%; 4 studies, 748 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but we are very uncertain. For direct costs, one study with 124 participants did not report full details and thus the results were inconclusive. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is currently no clear evidence for or against implementing transitional discharge interventions for people with schizophrenia. Transitional discharge interventions may improve patient satisfaction and functionality, but this evidence is also very uncertain. For future research, it is important to improve the quality of the conduct and reporting of these trials, including using validated tools for measuring their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Roson Rodriguez
- Research Department, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Xiao Chen
- Minerva University, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marcelo Arancibia
- Center for Translational Studies in Stress and Mental Health (C-ESTRES), Department of Psychiatry, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - Luis Garegnani
- Research Department, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Husam Aldeen Mohammad
- Department of Psychiatry, Al-Mowasat Hospital, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
| | - Juan Va Franco
- Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tyler N, Hodkinson A, Planner C, Angelakis I, Keyworth C, Hall A, Jones PP, Wright OG, Keers R, Blakeman T, Panagioti M. Transitional Care Interventions From Hospital to Community to Reduce Health Care Use and Improve Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2344825. [PMID: 38032642 PMCID: PMC10690480 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Discharge from the hospital to the community has been associated with serious patient risks and excess service costs. Objective To evaluate the comparative effectiveness associated with transitional care interventions with different complexity levels at improving health care utilization and patient outcomes in the transition from the hospital to the community. Data Sources CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched from inception until August 2022. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials evaluating transitional care interventions from hospitals to the community were identified. Data Extraction and Synthesis At least 2 reviewers were involved in all data screening and extraction. Random-effects network meta-analyses and meta-regressions were applied. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were readmission at 30, 90, and 180 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, mortality, quality of life, patient satisfaction, medication adherence, length of stay, primary care and outpatient visits, and intervention uptake. Results Overall, 126 trials with 97 408 participants were included, 86 (68%) of which were of low risk of bias. Low-complexity interventions were associated with the most efficacy for reducing hospital readmissions at 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.92) and 180 days (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66) and emergency department visits (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.96). Medium-complexity interventions were associated with the most efficacy at reducing hospital readmissions at 90 days (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.92), reducing adverse events (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.75), and improving medication adherence (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.67) but were associated with less efficacy than low-complexity interventions for reducing readmissions at 30 and 180 days. High-complexity interventions were most effective for reducing length of hospital stay (SMD, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.03) and increasing patient satisfaction (SMD, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.82) but were least effective for reducing readmissions at all time periods. None of the interventions were associated with improved uptake, quality of life (general, mental, or physical), or primary care and outpatient visits. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that low- and medium-complexity transitional care interventions were associated with reducing health care utilization for patients transitioning from hospitals to the community. Comprehensive and consistent outcome measures are needed to capture the patient benefits of transitional care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Tyler
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Hodkinson
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Planner
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ioannis Angelakis
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Institute of Population Health, Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alex Hall
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Richard Keers
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Pharmacy Department, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Aston-Under-Lyne, United Kingdom
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Blakeman
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Panagioti
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tyler N, Angelakis I, Keers RN, Planner C, Hodkinson A, Giles SJ, Grundy A, Kapur N, Armitage C, Blakeman T, Campbell SM, Robinson C, Leather J, Panagioti M. Evaluating a co-designed care bundle to improve patient safety at discharge from adult and adolescent mental health services (SAFER-MH and SAFER-YMH): protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069216. [PMID: 37041053 PMCID: PMC10106061 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients being discharged from inpatient mental wards often describe safety risks in terms of inadequate information sharing and involvement in discharge decisions. Through stakeholder engagement, we co-designed, developed and adapted two versions of a care bundle intervention, the SAFER Mental Health care bundle for adult and youth inpatient mental health settings (SAFER-MH and SAFER-YMH, respectively), that look to address these concerns through the introduction of new or improved processes of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Two uncontrolled before-and-after feasibility studies, where all participants will receive the intervention. We will examine the feasibility and acceptability of the SAFER-MH in inpatient mental health settings in patients aged 18 years or older who are being discharged and the feasibility and acceptability of the SAFER-YMH intervention in inpatient mental health settings in patients aged between 14 and 18 years who are being discharged. The baseline period and intervention periods are both 6 weeks. SAFER-MH will be implemented in three wards and SAFER-YMH in one or two wards, ideally across different trusts within England. We will use quantitative (eg, questionnaires, completion forms) and qualitative (eg, interviews, process evaluation) methods to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the two versions of the intervention. The findings will inform whether a main effectiveness trial is feasible and, if so, how it should be designed, and how many patients/wards should be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from the National Health Service Cornwall and Plymouth Research Ethics Committee and Surrey Research Ethics Committee (reference: 22/SW/0096 and 22/LO/0404). Research findings will be disseminated with participating sites and shared in various ways to engage different audiences. We will present findings at international and national conferences, and publish in open-access, peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Tyler
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ioannis Angelakis
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Richard Neil Keers
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Planner
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Sally J Giles
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Grundy
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Navneet Kapur
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Armitage
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tom Blakeman
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen M Campbell
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Catherine Robinson
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jessica Leather
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Panagioti
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soldini E, Alippi M, Zufferey MC, Lisi A, Lucchini M, Albanese E, Colombo RA, Rossa S, Bolla E, Mellacqua ZB, Larghi G, Cordasco S, Kawohl W, Crivelli L, Traber R. Effectiveness of crisis resolution home treatment for the management of acute psychiatric crises in Southern Switzerland: a natural experiment based on geography. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:405. [PMID: 35715789 PMCID: PMC9204869 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crisis Resolution Home Treatment (CRHT) is an alternative to inpatient treatment for acute psychiatric crises management. However, evidence on CRHT effectiveness is still limited. In the Canton of Ticino (Southern Switzerland), in 2016 the regional public psychiatric hospital replaced one acute ward with a CRHT. The current study was designed within this evaluation setting to assess the effectiveness of CRHT compared to standard inpatient treatment. METHODS CRHT was offered to patients aged 18 to 65 with an acute psychiatric crisis that would have required hospitalization. We used a natural experiment based on geography, where intervention and control groups were formed according to the place of residence. Primary endpoints were reduction of psychiatric symptoms at discharge measured using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, treatment duration in days, and rate and length of readmissions during a two-year follow-up period after discharge. Safety during the treatment period was measured with the number of serious adverse events (suicide/suicide attempts, major self-harm episodes, acute alcohol/drug intoxications, aggressions to caregivers or family members). We used linear, log-linear and logistic regression models with propensity scores for the main analysis. RESULTS We enrolled 321 patients; 67 were excluded because the treatment period was too short and 17 because they were transferred before the end of the treatment. Two hundred thirty-seven patients were available for data analysis, 93 in the intervention group and 144 in the control group. No serious adverse event was observed during the treatment period in both groups. Reduction of psychiatric symptoms at discharge (p-value = 0.359), readmission rates (p-value = 0.563) and length of readmissions (p-value = 0.770) during the two-year follow-up period did not differ significantly between the two groups. Treatment duration was significantly higher in the treatment group (+ 29.6% on average, p-value = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS CRHT was comparable to standard hospitalization in terms of psychiatric symptoms reduction, readmission rates and length of readmissions, but it was also characterized by a longer first treatment period. However, observational evidence following the study indicated that CRHT duration constantly lowered over time since its introduction in 2016 and became comparable to hospitalization, showing therefore to be an effective alternative also in terms of treatment length. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN38472626 (17/11/2020, retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emiliano Soldini
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928, Manno, Switzerland.
| | - Maddalena Alippi
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Maria Caiata Zufferey
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Angela Lisi
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Mario Lucchini
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754Department of Sociology and Social Research, Università Degli Studi Di Milano Bicocca, piazza dell’Ateneo nuovo 1, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Emiliano Albanese
- grid.29078.340000 0001 2203 2861Institute of Public Health (IPH), Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Raffaella Ada Colombo
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Simona Rossa
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Emilio Bolla
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Zefiro Benedetto Mellacqua
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppina Larghi
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Severino Cordasco
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Wolfram Kawohl
- Clienia Schlössli, Psychiatric Hospital, Schlösslistrasse 8, 8618 Oetwil Am See, Switzerland
| | - Luca Crivelli
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Rafael Traber
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim B, Weatherly C, Wolk CB, Proctor EK. Measurement of unnecessary psychiatric readmissions in the context of care transition interventions: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045364. [PMID: 33558362 PMCID: PMC7871679 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine how published studies of inpatient to outpatient mental healthcare transition processes have approached measuring unnecessary psychiatric readmissions. DESIGN Scoping review using Levac et al's enhancement to Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews. DATA SOURCES Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane and ISI Web of Science article databases were searched from 1 January 2009 through 28 February 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES We included studies that (1) are about care transition processes associated with unnecessary psychiatric readmissions and (2) specify use of at least one readmission time interval (ie, the time period since previous discharge from inpatient care, within which a hospitalisation can be considered a readmission). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We assessed review findings through tabular and content analyses of the data extracted from included articles. RESULTS Our database search yielded 3478 unique articles, 67 of which were included in our scoping review. The included articles varied widely in their reported readmission time intervals used. They provided limited details regarding which readmissions they considered unnecessary and which risks they accounted for in their measurement. There were no perceptible trends in associations between the variation in these findings and the included studies' characteristics (eg, target population, type of care transition intervention). CONCLUSIONS The limited specification with which studies report their approach to unnecessary psychiatric readmissions measurement is a noteworthy gap identified by this scoping review, and one that can hinder both the replicability of conducted studies and adaptations of study methods by future investigations. Recommendations stemming from this review include (1) establishing a framework for reporting the measurement approach, (2) devising enhanced guidelines regarding which approaches to use in which circumstances and (3) examining how sensitive research findings are to the choice of the approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Kim
- HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher Weatherly
- George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Courtney Benjamin Wolk
- Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Enola K Proctor
- George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lequin P, Ferrari P, Suter C, Milovan M, Besse C, Silva B, Golay P, Bonsack C, Favrod J. The Joint Crisis Plan: A Powerful Tool to Promote Mental Health. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:621436. [PMID: 33815165 PMCID: PMC8017151 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.621436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The Joint Crisis Plan (JCP) has received growing interest in clinical and research settings. JCP is a type of psychiatric advance statement that describes how to recognize early signs of crisis and how to manage crises. The purpose of the present study, to our knowledge the first to be conducted on this topic in the French-speaking context and to include inpatients, was to describe the content of JCPs and how they are perceived by patients and the providers. Methods: The study used an exploratory, mixed, sequential method. Existing JCPs were retrospectively collected in several clinical contexts (hospital, community settings, and sheltered accommodation). Based on their analyses, we conducted semi-structured interviews including some rating scales on the perception of the JCPs among patients and providers in these settings. For the qualitative analyses, content analyses were conducted with a hybrid approach using NVivo 12 software. Data were double-coded and discussed with a third researcher until agreement was reached. Results: One hundred eighty-four JCPs were collected retrospectively and 24 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 patients and 12 providers. No relatives could be included in the research process. The content of the studied JCPs was relevant and indicated that patients had good knowledge of themselves and their illness. Improvements in the quality of the therapeutic relationship, respect for patients' choices and wishes, and a greater sense of control of their illness were reported. The JCP was perceived as a very useful tool by patients and providers. Concerning JCP limitations, lack of staff training, difficulties with the shared decision-making process, and the poor availability of the JCPs when needed were reported. Conclusion: The study highlights that JCPs may be used with patients suffering from a large variety of psychiatric disorders in different care settings. The JCP is perceived as very useful by both patients and providers. The promising results of this study support the promotion of the wide use of JCPs with patients who have experienced crises. It is important to continue to research JCPs through impact studies that include family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Lequin
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pascale Ferrari
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.,La Source, School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Suter
- La Source, School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marion Milovan
- La Source, School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christine Besse
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Benedetta Silva
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Golay
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charles Bonsack
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Favrod
- La Source, School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Conlon M, Tew J, Solai LK, Gopalan P, Azzam P, Karp JF. Care Transitions in the Psychiatric Hospital: Focus on Older Adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 28:368-377. [PMID: 32029376 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Patients undergoing a care transition are vulnerable to duplication of services, conflicting care recommendations, and errors in medication reconciliation. Older adults may be more vulnerable to care transitions given their relatively higher medical burden, cognitive impairment, and frequent polypharmacy. In this Treatment in Geriatric Mental Health: Research in Action article, we first present the results of a quality improvement study examining the frequency of care transitions to and from the medical hospital among patients admitted to a university-affiliated psychiatric hospital. Among a sample of 50 geriatric adults and 50 nongeriatric adults admitted to the psychiatric hospital, we tallied the number of care transitions to and from the medical hospital. We found that the geriatric cohort was significantly more likely to experience this type of care transition (p = 0.012, Fisher's exact test) compared to the nongeriatric cohort. In the second part of this article, we use a clinical vignette to illustrate the types of medical errors that can occur as a vulnerable and frail older adult moves between acute psychiatric and medical settings. Finally, we list provider-level and systems-level evidence-based recommendations for how care of the patient in the vignette could be improved. The quality improvement study and clinical vignette demonstrate how older adults are at greater risk for care transitions to and from the acute medical setting during psychiatric hospitalization, and that creative solutions are required to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Conlon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - James Tew
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA
| | - LalithKumer K Solai
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Priya Gopalan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Pierre Azzam
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jordan F Karp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (MC, JT, LKS, PG, PA, and JFK), Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Michaud L, Stiefel F, Moreau D, Dorogi Y, Morier-Genoud A, Bourquin C. Suicides in Psychiatric Patients: Identifying Health Care-Related Factors through Clinical Practice Reviews. Arch Suicide Res 2020; 24:S150-S164. [PMID: 30856364 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2019.1586606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify health care-related factors associated with death by suicide in psychiatric patients and to gain insight into clinician views on how to deal with suicidality. The study material derived from a clinician committee in a psychiatric department reviewing every outpatient and inpatient suicide in a standardized way. Reports' conclusions and corresponding plenary discussion minutes regarding 94 suicides were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis. Health care-related factors were categorized into 4 themes: patient evaluation, patient management, clinician training, and involvement of relevant non-clinical partners. Clinician views on the themes were expressed through statements (i) promoting or restricting an aspect of care (here called recommendations), which mainly followed existing guidelines and were consensual and (ii) without precise indication (here called comments), which departed from mainstream opinions or addressed topics not covered by existing policy. Involvement of non-clinical partners emerged as a new key issue for suicide prevention in psychiatric departments and should be openly discussed with patients. Clinicians preferred balanced conclusions when they reviewed suicide cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Michaud
- McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Pavilion Frank B. Common, Montreal (Québec), Canada.,Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Friedrich Stiefel
- Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Delphine Moreau
- School of Health Science of Vaud (HESAV), University of Applied sciences and Art of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yves Dorogi
- Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anouk Morier-Genoud
- Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Céline Bourquin
- Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Penzenstadler L, Soares C, Machado A, Rothen S, Picchi A, Ferrari P, Zullino D, Khazaal Y. Advance Statements to Prevent Treatment Disengagement in Substance Use Disorders. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADDICTION 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/cxa.0000000000000067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
10
|
Tyler N, Wright N, Waring J. Interventions to improve discharge from acute adult mental health inpatient care to the community: systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:883. [PMID: 31760955 PMCID: PMC6876082 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4658-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The transition from acute mental health inpatient to community care is often a vulnerable period in the pathway, where people can experience additional risks and anxiety. Researchers globally have developed and tested a number of interventions that aim to improve continuity of care and safety in these transitions. However, there has been little attempt to compare and contrast the interventions and specify the variety of safety threats they attempt to resolve. Methods The study aimed to identify the evidence base for interventions to support continuity of care and safety in the transition from acute mental health inpatient to community services at the point of discharge. Electronic Databases including PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, CINAHL, IBSS, Cochrane Library Trials, ASSIA, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched between 2000 and May 2018. Peer reviewed papers were eligible for inclusion if they addressed adults admitted to an acute inpatient mental health ward and reported on health interventions relating to discharge from the acute ward to the community. The results were analysed using a narrative synthesis technique. Results The total number of papers from which data were extracted was 45. The review found various interventions implemented across continents, addressing problems related to different aspects of discharge. Some interventions followed a distinct named approach (i.e. Critical Time Intervention, Transitional Discharge Model), others were grouped based on key components (i.e. peer support, pharmacist involvement). The primary problems interventions looked to address were reducing readmission, improving wellbeing, reducing homelessness, improving treatment adherence, accelerating discharge, reducing suicide. The 69 outcomes reported across studies were heterogeneous, meaning it was difficult to conduct comparative quantitative meta-analysis or synthesis. Conclusions The interventions reviewed are spread across a spectrum ranging from addressing a single problem within a single agency with a single solution, to multiple solutions addressing multi-agency problems. We recommend that future research attempts to improve homogeneity in outcome reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Tyler
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Nicola Wright
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Justin Waring
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hegedüs A, Kozel B, Richter D, Behrens J. Effectiveness of Transitional Interventions in Improving Patient Outcomes and Service Use After Discharge From Psychiatric Inpatient Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:969. [PMID: 32038320 PMCID: PMC6985781 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The transition from psychiatric hospital to community is often hindered by challenges that influence community adjustment and continuity of care. Transitional interventions with bridging components are provided prior to discharge and continue beyond inpatient care. They provide continuity of care and may be effective in preventing readmission. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of transitional interventions with predischarge and postdischarge components in reducing readmissions and improving health-related or social outcomes of patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals. Methods: We conducted a systematic review by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Psyndex) and included randomized, nonrandomized, and one-group study designs. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on readmission rates. Other study designs were synthesized qualitatively. Results: After screening 2,673 publications, 16 studies (10 RCTs, three quasi-experimental, and three cohort studies) were included and nine RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The tested interventions included components from case management, psychoeducation, cognitive behavioral therapy, and peer support. All studies with significant improvements in at least one outcome provided elements of case management, most frequently in combination with cognitive behavioral therapy and psychoeducation. Readmission rates during follow-up ranged between 13% and 63% in intervention groups and 19% and 69% in control groups. Overall, we found an odds ratio of 0.76 (95% confidence interval = 0.55-1.05) for readmission due to transitional interventions. Heterogeneity was low at only 31% (p = 0.17) and the funnel plot indicated no obvious publication biases. Conclusions: We observed that transitional interventions with bridging components were no more effective in reducing readmission than treatment as usual; however, these results are based on limited evidence. Therefore, additional high-quality research is required to conclude the effectiveness of transitional interventions. Nevertheless, transitional interventions with bridging components are preferred by service users and could be an alternative to strategies regularly employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Hegedüs
- Research Institute, Careum School of Health Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland.,International Graduate Academy (InGrA), "Participation as Goal of Nursing and Therapy", Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Kozel
- International Graduate Academy (InGrA), "Participation as Goal of Nursing and Therapy", Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.,Department of Clinical Nursing Science, University Psychiatric Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dirk Richter
- Centre for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, University Psychiatric Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johann Behrens
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.,Frankfurt Institute of Supervision, Institutional Analysis and Social Research (ISIS non profit e.V.), Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cleverley K, Gore D, Nasir S, Ashley T, Rich L, Brown C, Hanssmann B, Holmes-Haronitis J, Villafana P, Kish J, Levy M. Facilitating Effective Transitions from Hospital to Community for Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Overview of the Transition Support Worker Role and Function. JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY = JOURNAL DE L'ACADEMIE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE DE L'ENFANT ET DE L'ADOLESCENT 2018; 27:228-235. [PMID: 30487938 PMCID: PMC6254258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Transitions between hospital and community services and from child and adolescent to adult services have been identified as a priority for improvement in the child and adolescent mental health and addictions sector across Canada and internationally. Despite widespread recognition of the issue, there is very little in the way of evidence to guide policy and programming to improve transitions. Transition support workers have been identified as a promising intervention to facilitate successful transitions, and innovative programs involving transition workers are currently operating in the Canadian mental health sector. This commentary presents two case studies of existing transition worker programs in the Greater Toronto Area that link hospital and community mental health sectors for youth ages 12-18. We discuss program characteristics, the transition worker role, recommendations to organizations considering creating a similar service, and areas for future research. The goal of this commentary is to contribute to knowledge exchange and ultimately strengthen the evidence base for the transition worker role in child and adolescent mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Cleverley
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Dana Gore
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | | | - Leora Rich
- East Metro Youth Services, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | | | | | | | - Julie Kish
- Scarborough and Rouge Hospital-Centenary Site, Scarborough, Ontario
| | - Myra Levy
- East Metro Youth Services, Toronto, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Franck N, Laforcade M. Responding to the needs of the population suffering from severe mental disorders by a multifaceted territorial approach: Reorganization of the French mental health system. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2018; 54:527-529. [PMID: 29479719 DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Organizing the management of severe mental disorders at the national level is a major challenge given the complexity of the disorders and the diversity of responses needed to address all the needs. A founding principle for the creation or development of measures consists in structuring care programs around functional and personal recovery, and not only clinical recovery. The fact that the French psychiatric field is currently being modernized by its missions being redefined within territorial mental health projects gives the opportunity to generalize these principles. This article illustrates how the creation of a hierarchical organization of psychosocial rehabilitation can (a) give more coherence to the part of the French mental health system, (b) improve the quality of care, and (c) promote social inclusion and recovery of people with severe mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Franck
- Centre ressource de réhabilitation psychosociale et de remédiation cognitive, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|