So Many Faces, Phases, and Facets, Sickness Behavior Beyond Disciplines

Back to the future of psychoneuroimmunology: Studying inflammation-induced sickness behavior

What do we know about sickness behavior? In this article, I guide you through some of the complexity of sickness behavior occurring after an immune challenge. I highlight the many features of behavioral and affective changes induced during experimental endotoxemia in humans, and describe how little we know about many of these features. I argue that we need to dismantle the components of inflammation-induced sickness behavior, and study each component in detail. I also point out the large inter-individual differences in inflammation-induced behavioral and affective changes, and the fact that psychosocial factors likely interact with inflammation to shape inflammation-induced sickness behavior. PNI clearly lacks investigations of the vulnerability and resilient factors underlying the inter-individual variability in sickness behavior. Throughout the article, I base my argument on my published articles, and provide concrete examples from my experience and the data that I have collected over the past 10 years. Given the relevance of inflammation-induced sickness behavior for inflammation-associated depression and for how people react to infections, I encourage current and future psychoneuroimmunologists to return towards basic science of sickness behavior.

•

Inflammation-related sickness behavior is relevant for inflammation-associated depression

•

The many features of sickness behavior should be investigated in detail

•

There are large inter-individual variability in sickness behavior

•

Vulnerability and resilient factors predicting sickness responses are little known

•

I call for a return towards basic science of sickness behavior.