Development and Evaluation of a Fidelity Instrument for PEARLS

Pilot trial protocol: community intervention to improve depressive symptoms among Peruvian older adults

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmacological interventions have proven effective at alleviating depression and anxiety symptoms in older adults. Methodological refinement and testing of these interventions in new contexts are needed on a small scale before their effectiveness and implementation can be evaluated. The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a future large-scale trial comparing an adapted mental health multi-component evidence-based intervention (VIDACTIVA) versus standard care for older adults experiencing depression symptoms in urban, resource-limited settings in Lima, Peru. Furthermore, this study will explore the acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity of implementing the intervention.

METHODS

We will conduct an open-label, mixed methods pilot feasibility study with two parallel groups. A total of 64 older adults, stratified by sex, will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either the "intervention" or "control." Participants will be followed for 22 weeks after enrollment. Those in the intervention group will receive eight VIDACTIVA sessions administered by community health workers (CHWs) over 14 weeks, with an additional eight weeks of follow-up. Participants in the control group will receive two psychoeducation sessions from a study fieldworker and will be directed to health care centers. Standard care does not involve CHWs. We will evaluate screening rates, recruitment strategies, retention rates, the acceptability of randomization, and assessments. Additionally, we will assess preliminary implementation outcomes-acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity-from the perspectives of CHWs (interventionists), older adults (main participants), older adults' relatives, and healthcare professionals.

DISCUSSION

If the findings from this feasibility trial are favorable, a fully powered randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate `both the effectiveness and implementation of the intervention. This research will make a substantial contribution to the field of mental health in older adults, particularly by emphasizing a meticulous examination and documentation of the implementation process. By doing so, this study will offer valuable methodologies and metrics for adapting and assessing mental health interventions tailored to the unique needs of older adults in resource-constrained contexts and diverse cultural settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The current trial registration number is NCT06065020, which was registered on 26th September 2023.

Effectiveness of the Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives (PEARLS) to reduce depression: a multi-state evaluation

Introduction

An estimated 15% of community-dwelling older adults have depressive symptoms in the U.S. The Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives (PEARLS) is an evidence-based program for managing late-life depression. PEARLS is a home/community-based collaborative care model delivered by community-based organizations to improve access to quality depression care. Trained staff actively screen for depression to improve recognition, teach problem-solving and activity planning skills for self-management, and connect participants to other supports and services as needed.

Methods

This study examined 2015-2021 data from 1,155 PEARLS participants across four states to assess PEARLS effectiveness to reduce depressive symptoms. The clinical outcomes were measured by the self-reported PHQ-9 instrument to assess changes in depressive symptoms scored as depression-related severity, clinical remission, and clinical response. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was fitted to examine changes in composite PHQ-9 scores from baseline to the final session. The model adjusted for participants' age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, income level, marital status, number of chronic conditions, and number of PEARLS sessions attended. Cox proportional hazards regression models were conducted to estimate the hazard ratio for improvement of depressive symptoms (i.e., remission or response), while adjusting for the covariates.

Results

PHQ-9 scale scores significantly improved from baseline to their final sessions (mean difference = -5.67, SEM = 0.16, p < 0.001). About 35% of participants achieved remission with PHQ-9 score < 5. Compared to participants with mild depression, patients with moderate depression (HR = 0.43, 95%CI = 0.35-0.55), moderately severe depression (HR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.21-0.38), and severe depression (HR = 0.22 95%CI = 0.14-0.34) were less likely to experience clinical remission with PHQ-9 score < 5, while adjusting for the covariates. About 73% achieved remission based on no longer having one or both cardinal symptoms. Compared to participants with mild depression, patients with moderate depression (HR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.56-0.78), moderately severe depression (HR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.38-0.56), and severe depression (HR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.29-0.51) were less likely to experience clinical remission, while adjusting for the covariates. Nearly 49% of participants had a clinical response or a ≥ 50% decrease in PHQ-9 scores over time. There were no differences between the severity of depression groups based on the time to clinical response.

Discussion

Findings confirm that PEARLS is an effective program to improve depressive symptoms among older adults in diverse real-world community settings and can be a more accessible option for depressive older adults who are traditionally underserved by clinical care.

Increasing Social Connectedness for Underserved Older Adults Living With Depression: A Pre-Post Evaluation of PEARLS

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate PEARLS effectiveness for increasing social connectedness among underserved older adults with depression.

DESIGN

Multisite, pre-post single-group evaluation.

SETTING

Community-based social service organizations (N = 16) in five U.S. states, purposively sampled for maximum variation of participants and providers.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 320 homebound older adults (mean(SD) age 72.9(9.6), 79% female, 44% people of color, 81% low-income, 61% living alone, average four chronic conditions) with clinically significant depression (PHQ-9 mean(SD) 12.7(4.6)).

INTERVENTION

Four to 6 month home-based depression care management model delivered by trained front-line providers.

MEASUREMENTS

Brief validated social connectedness scales: Duke Social Support Index 10-item (DSSI-10), PROMIS-Social Isolation (6-item), UCLA-Loneliness (3-item); sociodemographic and health measures.

RESULTS

At baseline, PEARLS participants overall and with ≥1 of the following characteristics were less socially connected: younger (50-64), white, LGBTQ+, not partnered, not caregiving, living alone, financial limitations, chronic conditions, and/or recently hospitalized. Six-months post-PEARLS enrollment, participants significantly increased social interactions and satisfaction with social support (DSSI-10 t[312] = 5.2, p <0.001); and reduced perceived isolation (PROMIS t[310] = 6.3, p <0.001); and loneliness (UCLA t[301] = 3.7, p =0.002), with small to moderate effect sizes (Cohen's d DSSI-10: 0.28, PROMIS-SI: 0.35, UCLA: 0.21). Increased social connectedness was associated with reduced depression. Improvements in social connectedness (except social interactions) persisted during early COVID-19. Being Latino and/or having difficulty paying for basic needs was associated with less improvement in post-PEARLS social connectedness.

CONCLUSION

PEARLS has potential to improve social connectedness among underserved older adults, though additional supports may be needed for persons facing multiple social determinants of health. Further research is needed to establish causality.