1
|
Job Retention and Reintegration in People with Mental Health Problems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Supported Employment Routine Programs. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023; 50:128-136. [PMID: 36289141 PMCID: PMC9832069 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01227-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Striking evidence supports the effectiveness of supported employment (SE) in achieving competitive employment in individuals with mental health problems. Yet, little is known whether SE is effective to maintain employment in individuals at risk of job loss. We aimed to descriptively compare SE for employed clients (SE-retention) and unemployed clients (SE-integration) regarding competitive employment. METHODS We used administrative data from January 2017 to October 2021 provided by a vocational rehabilitation center in Switzerland including all individuals (≥ 18yrs.) with mental health problems who participated either in SE-retention or SE-reintegration. The outcome was the proportion with competitive employment at discharge. Logistic regression was used to assess time trends and to descriptively compare SE-treatments. We used propensity score weighting, including personal, clinical and program-specific information to reduce group differences. RESULTS A total of 556 participants primarily diagnosed with mood/stress-related, schizophrenia and personality disorders were included (n = 297 SE-retention, n = 259 SE-reintegration) with median age 41 years and 57% female gender. The overall weighted comparison favored SE-retention over SE-reintegration OR 4.85 (95%-CI 3.10 to 7.58, p < 0.001) with predicted employment of 67.3% and 29.9% for SE-retention and SE-reintegration, respectively. While success for SE-reintegration remained stable over time, SE-retention showed an increase in more recent years. CONCLUSION SE-retention provides an approach for early work-related support that can prevent labor market exclusion. In contrast, reintegration is likely to require more efforts to achieve employment and may result in less favorable outcomes. It is therefore necessary that further research includes appropriate comparison groups to evaluate the effectiveness of SE-retention programs as well as the economic and individual benefits.
Collapse
|
2
|
Cook JA, Steigman PJ, Swarbrick M, Burke-Miller JK, Laing TB, Vite L, Jonikas JA, Brown I. Outcomes of Peer-Provided Individual Placement and Support Services in a Mental Health Peer-Run Vocational Program. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 74:480-487. [PMID: 36254454 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors sought to determine whether staff at a peer-run agency could deliver supported employment services with high fidelity to the individual placement and support (IPS) model and whether employment outcomes of peer-delivered IPS plus work-specific health promotion were superior to usual supported employment services. METHODS Two teams from a vocational program of a large peer-run agency were studied from July 2015 to July 2017. One team received training and supervision in delivering IPS plus employment-focused physical wellness support and mentoring. The other team continued providing usual supported employment services. Study data included vocational outcomes from 348 clients served by the two teams (IPS, N=184; comparison condition, N=164) and the results of IPS fidelity reviews of the IPS team at study baseline, midpoint, and end. The authors modeled the primary outcome of competitive employment with random-effects logistic regression and adjusted propensity scores for age, gender, race, ethnicity, education, and months of service receipt. RESULTS Following training, the IPS team demonstrated acceptable and increasing fidelity to the IPS model, achieving "good fidelity" by the end of the 25-month observation period. Among IPS recipients, 43% achieved competitive employment versus 21% of comparison recipients (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis indicated that IPS recipients were significantly more likely to achieve competitive employment than individuals in the comparison group (OR=4.06, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Providing training in IPS along with health promotion to the behavioral health peer workforce may help address the severe shortage of IPS services and enhance the competitive employment outcomes of people served by peer-run programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Cook
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| | - Pamela J Steigman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| | - Margaret Swarbrick
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| | - Jane K Burke-Miller
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| | - Taina B Laing
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| | - Laurie Vite
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| | - Jessica A Jonikas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| | - Isaac Brown
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago (Cook, Steigman, Burke-Miller, Jonikas); Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey, Freehold (Swarbrick); Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (Swarbrick); Baltic Street Advocacy, Employment, and Housing (AEH), Inc., New York City (Laing, Vite, Brown)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fit for Work and Life—an eight-week program for improvement of functionality and quality of life. NEUROPSYCHIATRIE 2022; 36:104-115. [PMID: 35428933 PMCID: PMC9012433 DOI: 10.1007/s40211-022-00415-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background The current two-stage study focused on work integration and quality of life of patients in an acute psychiatric day care unit. There is evidence that a longer absence from work due to illness negatively affects job retention, life satisfaction and clinical prognosis. Furthermore, there are individual supportive methods that proved to be effective in work integration. We therefore developed a specific group program Fit for Work and Life (FWL) for patients in an acute psychiatric day care unit focusing on work integration in the first labor market (in contrast to work in institutions for people with disabilities/second labor market). Methods Between 2018 and 2020, 62 patients (intervention group; IG) were enrolled in an 8‑week prospective job integration program and compared to 74 patients (control group; CG) who received treatment as usual (partly retrospective survey). Patients of both groups held a job when entering treatment. Main outcome was defined as their working status 4 weeks after the end of treatment as well as self-reported life satisfaction. Results At the end of treatment (i.e. the week prior to discharge), the IG participants reported higher overall life satisfaction as well as higher health-, self- and living condition-related satisfaction than controls. Functional and clinical improvement during treatment was linked to subsequently returning to work. Functional improvement was further linked to higher life satisfaction. Mediational analysis revealed an indirect path from functional improvement on life satisfaction via working status, i.e. the higher functional improvement during treatment, the higher the chance of successfully returning to work, which in turn increased life satisfaction. Conclusion Our findings suggest that programs such as FWL are useful interventions for employed patients to improve reintegration into work and life and to help to increase life satisfaction.
Collapse
|