1
|
He H, Peng X, Luo D, Wei W, Li J, Wang Q, Xiao Q, Li G, Bai S. Causal analysis of radiotherapy safety incidents based on a hybrid model of HFACS and Bayesian network. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1351367. [PMID: 38873320 PMCID: PMC11169683 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1351367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This research investigates the role of human factors of all hierarchical levels in radiotherapy safety incidents and examines their interconnections. Methods Utilizing the human factor analysis and classification system (HFACS) and Bayesian network (BN) methodologies, we created a BN-HFACS model to comprehensively analyze human factors, integrating the hierarchical structure. We examined 81 radiotherapy incidents from the radiation oncology incident learning system (RO-ILS), conducting a qualitative analysis using HFACS. Subsequently, parametric learning was applied to the derived data, and the prior probabilities of human factors were calculated at each BN-HFACS model level. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the human factors with the greatest influence on unsafe acts. Results The majority of safety incidents reported on RO-ILS were traced back to the treatment planning phase, with skill errors and habitual violations being the primary unsafe acts causing these incidents. The sensitivity analysis highlighted that the condition of the operators, personnel factors, and environmental factors significantly influenced the occurrence of incidents. Additionally, it underscored the importance of organizational climate and organizational process in triggering unsafe acts. Conclusion Our findings suggest a strong association between upper-level human factors and unsafe acts among radiotherapy incidents in RO-ILS. To enhance radiation therapy safety and reduce incidents, interventions targeting these key factors are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiping He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xudong Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Dashuang Luo
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Weige Wei
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qing Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guangjun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Sen Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu M, Li B, Cui H, Liao PC, Huang Y. Research Paradigm of Network Approaches in Construction Safety and Occupational Health. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12241. [PMID: 36231544 PMCID: PMC9565930 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Construction safety accidents seriously threaten the lives and health of employees; however, the complexity of construction safety problems continues to increase. Network approaches have been widely applied to address accident mechanics. This study aims to review related studies on construction safety and occupational health (CSOH) and summarize the research paradigm of recent decades. We solicited 119 peer-reviewed journal articles and performed a bibliometric analysis as the foundation of the future directions, application bottlenecks, and research paradigm. (1) Based on the keyword cluster, future directions are divided into four layers: key directions, core themes, key problems, and important methods. (2) The network approaches are not independently applied in the CSOH research. It needs to rely on different theories or be combined with other methods and models. However, in terms of approach applications, there are still some common limitations that restrict its application and development. (3) The research paradigm of network analysis process can be divided into four stages: description, explanation, prediction, and control. When the same network method encounters different research objects, it focuses on different analysis processes and plays different roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Liu
- School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Boning Li
- Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Hongjun Cui
- School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Pin-Chao Liao
- Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Yuecheng Huang
- Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Safety Risk Assessment of Prefabricated Buildings Hoisting Construction: Based on IHFACS-ISAM-BN. BUILDINGS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/buildings12060811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Prefabricated buildings that are more environmentally friendly have been vigorously promoted by the Chinese government because of the reduced waste and carbon emissions during the construction process. Most of the construction processes of prefabricated buildings are completed in the prefabricated component factory, but the safety risks during the hoisting process cannot be ignored. In this paper, the initial framework of a Bayesian Network (BN) is obtained from the combination of the improved Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Model (HFACS) and BN. The improved similarity aggregation method (SAM) is used to calculate the prior probability of BN, which can better summarize and deal with the fuzzy judgment of experts on risk accidents. The improved SAM can consider both the weight of experts and the relative consistency of their opinions, which is of great significance for improving the reliability of BN inputted data. This paper uses the construction project in Sanya, Hainan Province, to verify the validity of the model. The results show that the calculation results of the model are basically consistent with the actual situation. The safety risk of this project is relatively low, and the premise of unsafe behaviors and unsafe supervision are the key risk factors of the project. In addition to maintaining good construction conditions and workers’ healthy states, it is also necessary to carefully check the performance of tower cranes and equipment such as spreaders. During the operation process of the tower crane, workers should avoid walking or staying within the hoisting range.
Collapse
|