Reinfection rate of hepatitis C in HIV-1 positive men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis

An algorithm for simplified hepatitis C virus treatment with non-specialist care based on nation-wide data from Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Both European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) guidelines recommend simplified hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with pan-genotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for eligible patients. This observational study used real-world data to assess these regimens' safety in eligible patients and develop an algorithm to identify patients suitable for simplified treatment by non-specialists.

METHODS

7,677 HCV-infected patients from Taiwan Hepatitis C Registry (TACR) who received at least one dose of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and fulfilled the EASL/AASLD-IDSA criteria for simplified treatment were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was conducted on patient characteristics and safety data.

RESULTS

Overall, 92.8% (7,128/7,677) of patients achieved sustained virological response and only 1.9% (146/7,677) experienced Grades 2-4 laboratory abnormalities in key liver function parameters (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin), with only 18 patients (0.23%) experiencing Grades 3-4 abnormalities. Age > 70 years old, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, total bilirubin > 1.2 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and Fibrosis-4 > 3.25 were associated with higher risks of Grades 2-4 abnormalities. Patients with any of these had an odds of 4.53 times than that of those without in developing Grades 2-4 abnormalities (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data from Taiwan confirmed that simplified HCV treatment for eligible patients with pan-genotypic regimens is effective and well tolerated. The TACR algorithm, developed based on this study's results, can further identify patients who can be safely managed by non-specialist care.

Determining reinfection rates by hepatitis C testing interval among key populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Detecting hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection among key populations helps prevent ongoing transmission. This systematic review aims to determine the association between different testing intervals during post-SVR follow-up on the detection of HCV reinfection among highest risk populations.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases between January 2014 and February 2023 for studies that tested individuals at risk for HCV reinfection at discrete testing intervals and reported HCV reinfection incidence among key populations. Pooled estimates of reinfection incidence were calculated by population and testing frequency using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-one single-armed observational studies (9453 individuals) were included. Thirty-eight studies (8931 individuals) reported HCV reinfection incidence rate and were included in meta-analyses. The overall pooled estimate of HCV reinfection incidence rate was 4.13 per 100 per person-years (py) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.45-4.81). The pooled incidence estimate among people who inject drugs (PWID) was 2.84 per 100 py (95% CI: 2.19-3.50), among men who have sex with men (MSM) 7.37 per 100 py (95% CI: 5.09-9.65) and among people in custodial settings 7.23 per 100 py (95% CI: 2.13-16.59). The pooled incidence estimate for studies reporting a testing interval of ≤6 months (4.26 per 100 py; 95% CI: 2.86-5.65) was higher than studies reporting testing intervals >6 months (5.19 per 100 py; 95% CI: 3.92-6.46).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV reinfection incidence was highest in studies of MSM and did not appear to change with retesting interval. Shorter testing intervals are likely to identify more reinfections, help prevent onward transmission where treatment is available and enable progress towards global HCV elimination, but additional comparative studies are required.

Elimination of hepatitis C in a hospital characterized by infectious diseases

Background

The World Health Organization has proposed to eliminate hepatitis C by 2030, yet there is still a large gap to the goal. Screening for hepatitis C is cost-effective and efficient in medical institutions. The aim of this study was to identify the key populations for HCV antibody screening in hospital characterized by infectious diseases, and provide estimates of the proportion of HCV-infected persons in the Beijing Ditan hospital completing each step along a proposed HCV treatment cascade.

Methods

A total of 105,112 patients who underwent HCV antibody testing in Beijing Ditan hospital between 2017 and 2020 were included in this study. HCV antibody and HCV RNA positivity rate were calculated and compared by chi-square test.

Results

The positivity rate of HCV antibody was 6.78%. The HCV antibody positivity rate and the proportion of positive patients showed an upward trend along with age in the five groups between 10–59 years. In the contrary, a decreasing trend was observed in the three groups above 60 years. Patients with positive HCV antibody were mainly from the Liver Disease Center (36.53%), the Department of Integrative Medicine (16.10%), the Department of Infectious Diseases (15.93%) and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (9.44%). Among HCV antibody positive patients, 6,129 (85.95%) underwent further HCV RNA testing, of whom 2097 were HCV RNA positive, the positivity rate was 34.21%. Of the patients who were HCV RNA positive, 64.33% did not continue with HCV RNA testing. The cure rate for HCV antibody positive patients was 64.98%. Besides, there was a significant positive correlation between HCV RNA positivity rate and HCV antibody level (r = 0.992, P &lt; 0.001). The detection rate of HCV antibody among inpatients showed an upward trend (Z = 5.567, P &lt; 0.001), while the positivity rate showed a downward trend (Z = 2.2926, P = 0.0219).

Conclusions

We found that even in hospitals characterized by infectious diseases, a large proportion of patients did not complete each step along a proposed HCV treatment cascade. Besides, we identified key populations for HCV antibody screening, namely: (1) patients over 40 years of age, especially those aged 50–59 years; (2) the Department of Infectious Diseases and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology patients. In addition, HCV RNA testing was highly recommended for patients with HCV antibody levels above 8 S/CO.