1
|
Nohová I, Andrews J, Votan B, Miller A, Sehouli J, Berger R. Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1735. [PMID: 38045625 PMCID: PMC10691166 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Involving patients in research, not only as trial subjects, is not a newly established practice. Over the last two decades, patient roles have gradually expanded to become active research contributors, creating a more patient-centered research landscape. Our survey has explored the scope of patient involvement within the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG), an International Gynecologic Cancer Research Consortium, and identified challenges in developing a systematic, meaningful and sustainable level of patient involvement. Methods In late 2019, the GCIG Harmonisation Operations Committee conducted an online survey across 26 national and/or international research cooperative groups, aiming to identify current patient involvement practices implemented by each group. Twelve questions were asked. The results have been generated to support a systematic strategic planning process to increase patient involvement into clinical research projects. Results More than half of the 26 participating groups have either already involved (15, [58%]) or are planning (6, [23%]) to involve patients in their research activities. Gaining patient support in raising public awareness around clinical trials appears to be one of the most desired benefits (21, [81%]). Ten respondents managed to integrate patient involvement into their standard practice. When involving patients in research the groups mostly consider that patients bring added value to the study (19, [73%]), although only eight groups (40%) have a well-organized process in doing so. Conclusion Even though patient involvement is considered a significant added value to clinical research, its application within GCIG groups is not considered on a regular basis and is predominantly limited to operational aspects of research activities. The lack of resources and expertize, as well as the missing well-organized and structured process of some groups, combined with their ability to ensure process sustainability, are among the main factors affecting implementation and adoption of patient involvement within GCIG research activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Nohová
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology First Faculty of MedicineCharles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG)PragueCzech Republic
| | - John Andrews
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG)CamperdownAustralia
| | - Bénédicte Votan
- Association de Recherche dans les CAncers Gynécologiques–Groupe d'Investigateurs National pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire et du sein (ARCAGY‐GINECO)ParisFrance
| | - Austin Miller
- Department of Biostatistics and BioinformaticsRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, GOG FoundationBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological SurgeryCharité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Nord‐Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (NOGGO e.V.)BerlinGermany
| | - Regina Berger
- Department for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of InnsbruckArbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Österreich (AGO Austria)InnsbruckAustria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kogetsu A, Isono M, Aikyo T, Furuta J, Goto D, Hamakawa N, Hide M, Hori R, Ikeda N, Inoi K, Kawagoe N, Kubota T, Manabe S, Matsumura Y, Matsuyama K, Nakai T, Nakao I, Saito Y, Senoo M, Takahashi MP, Takeda T, Takei M, Tamai K, Tanaka A, Torashima Y, Tsuchida Y, Yamasaki C, Yamamoto BA, Kato K. Enhancing evidence-informed policymaking in medicine and healthcare: stakeholder involvement in the Commons Project for rare diseases in Japan. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:107. [PMID: 38031179 PMCID: PMC10685685 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00515-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although stakeholder involvement in policymaking is attracting attention in the fields of medicine and healthcare, a practical methodology has not yet been established. Rare-disease policy, specifically research priority setting for the allocation of limited research resources, is an area where evidence generation through stakeholder involvement is expected to be effective. We generated evidence for rare-disease policymaking through stakeholder involvement and explored effective collaboration among stakeholders. METHODS We constructed a space called 'Evidence-generating Commons', where patients, family members, researchers, and former policymakers can share their knowledge and experiences and engage in continual deliberations on evidence generation. Ten rare diseases were consequently represented. In the 'Commons', 25 consecutive workshops were held predominantly online, from 2019 to 2021. These workshops focused on (1) clarification of difficulties faced by rare-disease patients, (2) development and selection of criteria for priority setting, and (3) priority setting through the application of the criteria. For the first step, an on-site workshop using sticky notes was held. The data were analysed based on KJ method. For the second and third steps, workshops on specific themes were held to build consensus. The workshop agendas and methods were modified based on participants' feedback. RESULTS The 'Commons' was established with 43 participants, resulting in positive effects such as capacity building, opportunities for interactions, mutual understanding, and empathy among the participants. The difficulties faced by patients with rare diseases were classified into 10 categories. Seven research topics were identified as priority issues to be addressed including 'impediments to daily life', 'financial burden', 'anxiety', and 'burden of hospital visits'. This was performed by synthesising the results of the application of the two criteria that were particularly important to strengthen future research on rare diseases. We also clarified high-priority research topics by using criteria valued more by patients and family members than by researchers and former policymakers, and criteria with specific perspectives. CONCLUSION We generated evidence for policymaking in the field of rare diseases. This study's insights into stakeholder involvement can enhance evidence-informed policymaking. We engaged in comprehensive discussions with policymakers regarding policy implementation and planned analysis of the participants' experiences in this project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Kogetsu
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
| | - Moeko Isono
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Aikyo
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
- School of Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Junichi Furuta
- Department of Medical Informatics and Management, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Dai Goto
- Department of Stem Cell Therapy Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nao Hamakawa
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Michihiro Hide
- Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
- Japanese Society of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Family Net Committee, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Risa Hori
- Department of Dermatology, Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Noriko Ikeda
- Commons Project, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiko Inoi
- NPO Japan Marfan Association, Kuwana, Mie, Japan
| | - Naomi Kawagoe
- MECP2 Duplication Syndrome Family Association, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoya Kubota
- Department of Clinical Laboratory and Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shirou Manabe
- Department of Transformative System for Medical Information, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Matsumura
- Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Tomoko Nakai
- Japanese Huntington's Disease Network (JHDN), Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yuki Saito
- Commons Project, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Midori Senoo
- NPO Myotonic Dystrophy Patients' Group of Japan (DM-Family), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori P Takahashi
- Department of Clinical Laboratory and Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Takeda
- Department of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Megumi Takei
- Japanese Society of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Family Net Committee, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Katsuto Tamai
- Department of Stem Cell Therapy Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akio Tanaka
- Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Torashima
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yuya Tsuchida
- NPO Myotonic Dystrophy Patients' Group of Japan (DM-Family), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chisato Yamasaki
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
- Center for Intractable Diseases and ImmunoGenomics (CiDIC), Health and Nutrition (NIBIOHN), National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Beverley Anne Yamamoto
- HAEJ, Non-Profit Patient Organization for Hereditary Angioedema in Japan, Kakogawa, Hyogo, Japan
- HAEi, Non-Profit International Patient Organization for Hereditary Angioedema Registered in the US, Fairfax City, VA, USA
- Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuto Kato
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Katirai A, Yamamoto BA, Kogetsu A, Kato K. Perspectives on artificial intelligence in healthcare from a Patient and Public Involvement Panel in Japan: an exploratory study. Front Digit Health 2023; 5:1229308. [PMID: 37781456 PMCID: PMC10533983 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1229308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients and members of the public are the end users of healthcare, but little is known about their views on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly in the Japanese context. This paper reports on an exploratory two-part workshop conducted with members of a Patient and Public Involvement Panel in Japan, which was designed to identify their expectations and concerns about the use of AI in healthcare broadly. 55 expectations and 52 concerns were elicited from workshop participants, who were then asked to cluster and title these expectations and concerns. Thematic content analysis was used to identify 12 major themes from this data. Participants had notable expectations around improved hospital administration, improved quality of care and patient experience, and positive changes in roles and relationships, and reductions in costs and disparities. These were counterbalanced by concerns about problematic changes to healthcare and a potential loss of autonomy, as well as risks around accountability and data management, and the possible emergence of new disparities. The findings reflect participants' expectations for AI as a possible solution for long-standing issues in healthcare, though their overall balanced view of AI mirrors findings reported in other contexts. Thus, this paper offers initial, novel insights into perspectives on AI in healthcare from the Japanese context. Moreover, the findings are used to argue for the importance of involving patient and public stakeholders in deliberation on AI in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Katirai
- Research Center on Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | | | - Atsushi Kogetsu
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Kazuto Kato
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|