Metagenomic next-generation sequencing assists in the diagnosis of Cryptococcus pneumonia: Case series and literature review

Clinical metagenomics-assisted diagnosis of relapsed HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis

To date, the identification of crypotococcal relapse remains clinically challenging as it often has similar manifestation with paradoxical immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This study reports on the use of metagenomics assisted next generation sequencing to aid in diagnosing recurrent cryptococcal meningitis in an person living with HIV experiencing recurring symptoms, despite negative culture results for Cryptococcus neoformans in the cerebrospinal fluid. Although fungal culture was negative, when reads from metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing performed on the Day 308 cerebrospinal fluid sample were mapped onto the genome from the Day 4 isolate, 589 specific reads were identified. NCBI BLAST search also revealed Cryptococcus-specific 18S/25S/28S ribosomal RNA, indicating a relapse of the disease.

Diagnostic accuracy of cryptococcal antigen test in pulmonary cryptococcosis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) test was proposed as a rapid diagnostic tool to identify cryptococcal meningitis in patients suffering from AIDS. Several studies have demonstrated its diagnostic performance in cryptococcal meningitis. However, the diagnostic performance of the CrAg test in serum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis remains uncertain. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to summarise the evidence concerning diagnostic performance of the CrAg test in patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Wanfang Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure will be searched systematically. The titles and abstracts will be reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool will be used to evaluate the risk of bias and clinical applicability of each study. Potential sources of heterogeneity will be investigated through visual inspection of the paired forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic plots. The pooled summary statistics for the area under the curve, sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios and diagnostic ORs with 95% CI will be reported.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The underlying study is based on published articles thus does not require ethical approval. The findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated in various scientific conferences and seminars.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022373321.