Novel risk patterns of vasovagal reactions in NZ blood donations complicated by COVID-19 restrictions

Development and validation of a scoring system to predict vasovagal reaction upon whole-blood donation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Risk factors for vasovagal reaction (VVR) have been extensively studied. With knowledge of the relative importance of these risk factors for VVR, collection staff could take care of blood donors from the same standpoint, leading to improved donor safety. We therefore developed a scoring system to predict VVR, which incorporates registration information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-syncopal and syncopal symptoms, as well as on- and off-site reactions, are included in this analysis as VVR. We defined the donor status as follows: first-time donors, repeat donors with no history of reaction and repeat donors with a history of reaction. We prepared two datasets: whole-blood donations at a blood donation site in Tokyo between January 2019 and December 2019 were included in training data (n = 361,114), and whole-blood donations between January 2020 and August 2020 were included in testing data (n = 216,211).

RESULTS

The most important variable was the donor status, followed by age, estimated blood volume and height. We integrated them into a scoring system. Training and testing datasets were combined (n = 577,325), and VVR rates in groups with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 or more were 0.09% (95% CI: 0.081%-0.10%), 0.33% (95% CI: 0.31%-0.36%), 0.87% (95% CI: 0.78%-0.96%), 1.17% (95% CI: 1.05%-1.30%), 2.15% (95% CI: 1.98%-2.32%) and 3.11% (95% CI: 2.90%-3.34%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The scoring system enables staff to significantly predict VVR and may help them to identify donors at increased risk of experiencing syncope, thereby mitigating the negative impact of VVR on donor safety and return by paying close attention to high-risk donors.

Sociodemographic Factors Related to Adverse Donor Reactions in Shenzhen

Background

The adverse donor reaction (ADR) means the uncomfortable feeling felt by blood donors during the whole process of blood donation, which can affect the blood donation behavior of blood donors. So, it is very necessary for blood centers to monitor and prevent it.

Methods

Data about ADRs in Shenzhen Blood Center from January 2018 to December 2022 were collected, and correlation analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0 software.

Results

From January 2018 to December 2022, a total of 1265 ADRs occurred in 642,767 blood donations in Shenzhen Blood Center, with an incidence of 0.20%. Most of the ADRs were mild and occurred during blood collections (>90%). The ADR rate of young individuals aged 18-29 years old was the highest (p<0.0001). In addition, a higher ADR rate was observed in first-time blood donors, whole blood donors, and blood donors who donated in the mobile sites (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The occurrence of ADRs is related to the sociodemographic factors of blood donors, including age, donation type, donation history, and donation sites. Shenzhen Blood Centers should pay special attention to the process of blood donation among young blood donors aged 18-29 years old, first-time blood donors, whole-blood donors, and blood donors who donate at mobile sites to further reduce the occurrence of ADRs.