1
|
Wehrle CJ, Zhang M, Khalil M, Pita A, Modaresi Esfeh J, Diago-Uso T, Kim J, Aucejo F, Kwon DCH, Ali K, Cazzaniga B, Miyazaki Y, Liu Q, Fares S, Hong H, Tuul M, Jiao C, Sun K, Fairchild RL, Quintini C, Fujiki M, Pinna AD, Miller C, Hashimoto K, Schlegel A. Impact of Back-to-Base Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Complications and Costs: A Multicenter, Real-World Risk-Matched Analysis. Ann Surg 2024; 280:300-310. [PMID: 38557793 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess cost and complication outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). BACKGROUND End-ischemic NMP is often used to aid logistics, yet its impact on outcomes after LT remains unclear, as does its true impact on costs associated with transplantation. METHODS Deceased donor liver recipients at 2 centers (January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2023) were included. Retransplants, splits, and combined grafts were excluded. End-ischemic NMP (OrganOx-Metra) was implemented in October 2022 for extended-criteria donation after brain death (DBDs), all donations after circulatory deaths (DCDs), and logistics. NMP cases were matched 1:2 with static cold storage controls (SCS) using the Balance-of-Risk [donation after brain death (DBD)-grafts] and UK-DCD Score (DCD-grafts). RESULTS Overall, 803 transplantations were included, 174 (21.7%) receiving NMP. Matching was achieved between 118 NMP-DBDs with 236 SCS; and 37 NMP-DCD with 74 corresponding SCS. For both graft types, median inpatient comprehensive complications index values were comparable between groups. DCD-NMP grafts experienced reduced cumulative 90-day comprehensive complications index (27.6 vs 41.9, P =0.028). NMP also reduced the need for early relaparotomy and renal replacement therapy, with subsequently less frequent major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IVa). This effect was more pronounced in DCD transplants. NMP had no protective effect on early biliary complications. Organ acquisition/preservation costs were higher with NMP, yet NMP-treated grafts had lower 90-day pretransplant costs in the context of shorter waiting list times. Overall costs were comparable for both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS This is the first risk-adjusted outcome and cost analysis comparing NMP and SCS. In addition to logistical benefits, NMP was associated with a reduction in relaparotomy and bleeding in DBD grafts, and overall complications and post-LT renal replacement for DCDs. While organ acquisition/preservation was more costly with NMP, overall 90-day health care costs-per-transplantation were comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jamak Modaresi Esfeh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Transplant Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Teresa Diago-Uso
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jaekeun Kim
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | | | | | - Khaled Ali
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | | | | | - Qiang Liu
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | - Sami Fares
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | - Hanna Hong
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | | | - Chunbao Jiao
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Keyue Sun
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert L Fairchild
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Cristiano Quintini
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | - Koji Hashimoto
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wehrle CJ, Jiao C, Sun K, Zhang M, Fairchild RL, Miller C, Hashimoto K, Schlegel A. Machine perfusion in liver transplantation: recent advances and coming challenges. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:228-238. [PMID: 38726745 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Machine perfusion has been adopted into clinical practice in Europe since the mid-2010s and, more recently, in the United States (US) following approval of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). We aim to review recent advances, provide discussion of potential future directions, and summarize challenges currently facing the field. RECENT FINDINGS Both NMP and hypothermic-oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) improve overall outcomes after liver transplantation versus traditional static cold storage (SCS) and offer improved logistical flexibility. HOPE offers additional protection to the biliary system stemming from its' protection of mitochondria and lessening of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is touted to offer similar protective effects on the biliary system, though this has not been studied prospectively.The most critical question remaining is the optimal use cases for each of the three techniques (NMP, HOPE, and NRP), particularly as HOPE and NRP become more available in the US. There are additional questions regarding the most effective criteria for viability assessment and the true economic impact of these techniques. Finally, with each technique purported to allow well tolerated use of riskier grafts, there is an urgent need to define terminology for graft risk, as baseline population differences make comparison of current data challenging. SUMMARY Machine perfusion is now widely available in all western countries and has become an essential tool in liver transplantation. Identification of the ideal technique for each graft, optimization of viability assessment, cost-effectiveness analyses, and proper definition of graft risk are the next steps to maximizing the utility of these powerful tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chunbao Jiao
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Keyue Sun
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mingyi Zhang
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert L Fairchild
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Koji Hashimoto
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Goeij FHC, De Meijer V, Mergental H, Guarrera JV, Asthana S, Ghinolfi D, Boteon YL, Selzner N, Kalisvaart M, Pulitano C, Sonnenday C, Martins PN, Berlakovich G, Schlegel A. Challenges With the Implementation of Machine Perfusion in Clinical Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2024; 108:1296-1307. [PMID: 38057969 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Dynamic organ preservation is a relatively old technique which has regained significant interest in the last decade. Machine perfusion (MP) techniques are applied in various fields of solid organ transplantation today. The first clinical series of ex situ MP in liver transplantation was presented in 2010. Since then, the number of research and clinical applications has substantially increased. Despite the notable beneficial effect on organ quality and recipient outcome, MP is still not routinely used in liver transplantation. Based on the enormous need to better preserve organs and the subsequent demand to continuously innovate and develop perfusion equipment further, this technology is also beneficial to test and deliver future therapeutic strategies to livers before implantation. This article summarizes the various challenges observed during the current shift from static to dynamic liver preservation in the clinical setting. The different organ perfusion strategies are discussed first, together with ongoing clinical trials and future study design. The current status of research and the impact of costs and regulations is highlighted next. Factors contributing to costs and other required resources for a worldwide successful implementation and reimbursement are presented third. The impact of research on cost-utility and effectivity to guide the tailored decision-making regarding the optimal perfusion strategy is discussed next. Finally, this article provides potential solutions to the challenging field of innovation in healthcare considering the various social and economic factors and the role of clinical, regulatory, and financial stakeholders worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke H C De Goeij
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent De Meijer
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Research Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hynek Mergental
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- The Liver Unit, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James V Guarrera
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
| | | | - Davide Ghinolfi
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Yuri L Boteon
- Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Ajmera Transplant Center, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marit Kalisvaart
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carlo Pulitano
- Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Paulo N Martins
- Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Hospital, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
| | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Transplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Department of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foguenne M, MacMillan S, Kron P, Nath J, Devresse A, De Meyer M, Michel M, Hosgood S, Darius T. Current Evidence and Future Perspectives to Implement Continuous and End-Ischemic Use of Normothermic and Oxygenated Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Clinical Practice. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093207. [PMID: 37176647 PMCID: PMC10178893 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of high-risk renal grafts for transplantation requires the optimization of pretransplant assessment and preservation reconditioning strategies to decrease the organ discard rate and to improve short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Active oxygenation is increasingly recognized to play a central role in dynamic preservation strategies, independent of preservation temperature, to recondition mitochondria and to restore the cellular energy profile. The oxygen-related decrease in mitochondrial succinate accumulation ameliorates the harmful effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury. The differences between normothermic and hypothermic machine perfusion with regard to organ assessment, preservation, and reconditioning, as well as the logistic and economic implications, are factors to take into consideration for implementation at a local level. Therefore, these different techniques should be considered complementary to the perfusion strategy selected depending on functional intention and resource availability. This review provides an overview of the current clinical evidence of normothermic and oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion, either as a continuous or end-ischemic preservation strategy, and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Foguenne
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, University Clinics Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Serena MacMillan
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Philipp Kron
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jay Nath
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Southmead Hospital Bristol, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Arnaud Devresse
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, University Clinics Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology, University Clinics Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine De Meyer
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, University Clinics Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mourad Michel
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, University Clinics Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sarah Hosgood
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Tom Darius
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, University Clinics Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|