Reactive Postural Responses After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Association With Musculoskeletal Injury Risk in Collegiate Athletes: A Study Protocol

Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes

BACKGROUND

Postural instability is a common observation after concussions, with balance assessments playing a crucial role in clinical evaluations. Widely used post-concussion balance tests focus primarily on static and dynamic balance, excluding the critical aspect of reactive balance.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the acute and longitudinal effects of concussion on reactive balance in collegiate athletes.

METHODS

Concussed and healthy matched controls NCAA division I athletes were assessed at pre-season baseline and 4 post-concussion timepoints: acute, pre-return-to-play (RTP), post-RTP, and 6 months post-concussion. The instrumented-modified Push and Release test measured reactive balance during single- and dual-task conditions. Longitudinal effects of concussions on time to stability and step latency metrics were investigated applying Generalized Estimating Equations.

RESULTS

Acutely after concussion, athletes demonstrated impaired reactive balance, indicated by longer times to stability, in dual-task conditions (P = .004). These acute impairments were transient and recovered over time. Exploratory analyses revealed that athletes who sustained their first lifetime concussion exhibited both acute (P = .037) and longitudinal (P = .004 at post-RTP) impairments in single- and dual-task compared to controls with no lifetime concussion.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive evaluation provides insights into the multifaceted nature of post-concussion impairments and emphasizes the importance of considering cognitive demand and history of concussions in assessing athletes' balance.

The Relation Among Reactive Stepping and Fall-Related Psychological Factors in Multiple Sclerosis

Purpose: Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience changes in balance, such as poor and reactive stepping, as well as altered fall-related psychological factors, such as increased concern about falling and feared consequences about falling. Such concerns and fear may relate to and influence mobility. However, these relations are poorly understood in people with MS. This study aimed to investigate the relation between reactive stepping performance and fall-related psychological factors, as well as to assess how these relations differ between individuals who have and have not fallen. Methods: In a single session, participants completed measures regarding fall-related psychological factors (balance confidence, concern about falling, and feared consequences of falling) and completed reactive stepping tasks. Following the visit, participants completed weekly surveys for 3 months to report their falls. Spearman rho correlations were computed to examine associations between participants' reactive stepping performance and their fall-related concerns, confidence, and consequences, with a stratified analysis to compare these associations between fallers and non-fallers. Results: 44 individuals with MS participated in our study, with 27 individuals experiencing 0 falls (non-fallers) and 17 individuals experiencing at least 1 fall (fallers) in the 3-month follow-up period. Better reactive stepping performance was correlated with fewer concerns, greater confidence, and lower feared consequences related to falling. The stratified analysis revealed a greater number of significant associations for non-fallers than fallers, although the small sample of fallers reduced our ability to detect a relationship in this group. Conclusions: Reactive stepping was associated with fall-related psychological factors. Interventions targeting reactive stepping may be beneficial in enhancing fall-related psychological well-being in the MS community.

Instrumented Static and Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes: Normative Values and Minimal Detectable Change

CONTEXT

Wearable sensors are increasingly popular in concussion research because of their objective quantification of subtle balance deficits. However, normative data and minimal detectable change (MDC) values are necessary to serve as references for diagnostic use and tracking longitudinal recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To identify normative and MDC values for instrumented static- and reactive-balance tests, an instrumented static mediolateral (ML) root mean square (RMS) sway standing balance assessment and the instrumented, modified push and release (I-mP&R), respectively.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Clinical setting.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Normative static ML RMS sway and I-mP&R data were collected on 377 (n = 184 female) healthy National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes at the beginning of their competitive seasons. Test-retest data were collected in 36 healthy control athletes based on standard recovery timelines after concussion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and MDC values were calculated for primary outcomes of ML RMS sway in a static double-limb stance on firm ground and a foam block, and time to stability and latency from the I-mP&R in single- and dual-task conditions.

RESULTS

Normative outcomes across static ML RMS sway and I-mP&R were sensitive to sex and type of footwear. Mediolateral RMS sway demonstrated moderate reliability in the firm condition (ICC = 0.73; MDC = 2.7 cm/s2) but poor reliability in the foam condition (ICC = 0.43; MDC = 11.1 cm/s2). Single- and dual-task times to stability from the I-mP&R exhibited good reliability (ICC = 0.84 and 0.80, respectively; MDC = 0.25 and 0.29 seconds, respectively). Latency from the I-mP&R had poor to moderate reliability (ICC = 0.38 and 0.55; MDC = 107 and 105 milliseconds).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex-matched references should be used for instrumented static- and reactive-balance assessments. Footwear may explain variability in static ML RMS sway and time to stability of the I-mP&R. Moderate-to-good reliability suggests time to stability from the I-mP&R and ML RMS static sway on firm ground can be used for longitudinal assessments.

Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Sport-related Concussion on Reactive Balance

Postural instability is a common observation after concussions, with balance assessments playing a crucial role in clinical evaluations. Widely used post-concussion balance tests focus primarily on static and dynamic balance, excluding the critical aspect of reactive balance. This study investigated the acute and longitudinal effects of concussion on reactive balance in collegiate athletes. The assessments were conducted at pre-season baseline and 4 post-concussion timepoints: acute, pre-return-to-play, post-return-to-play, and six months post-concussion. The instrumented-modified Push and Release test measured reactive balance. Longitudinal effects of concussions on time to stability and step latency metrics were investigated applying Generalized Estimating Equations. Acutely after concussion, athletes demonstrated impaired reactive balance, indicated by longer times to stability, in dual-task conditions ( p = 0.004). These acute impairments were transient and recovered over time. Exploratory analyses revealed that athletes who sustained their first lifetime concussion exhibited both acute ( p = 0.037) and longitudinal ( p = 0.004 at post-return-to-play) impairments in single- and dual-task compared to controls with no lifetime concussion. This comprehensive evaluation provides insights into the multifaceted nature of post-concussion impairments and emphasizes the importance of considering cognitive demand and history of concussions in assessing athletes' balance.

Use of Reactive Balance Assessments With Clinical Baseline Concussion Assessments in Collegiate Athletes

CONTEXT

Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify redundancy in current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and determine whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Clinical assessment.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 279 healthy National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes.

INTERVENTION(S)

Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season. For cohort 1 (n = 191), the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool, instrumented modified push and release (I-mP&R), and Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) were administered. For cohort 2 (n = 88), the I-mP&R, BESS, timed tandem gait, walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time were administered.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The strengths of the relationships between the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool cognitive indices, mP&R clinical score, instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), BESS score, timed tandem gait, walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time were characterized.

RESULTS

The strongest interinstrument correlation value was between single-task time to stability from the I-mP&R and clinical reaction time but was considered weak (r = 0.35, P = .001). The mP&R and I-mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Weak correlations between interassessment variables indicated that little redundancy was present in the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.

The Microsoft HoloLens 2 Provides Accurate Biomechanical Measures of Performance During Military-Relevant Activities in Healthy Adults

INTRODUCTION

Augmented reality systems, like the HoloLens 2 (HL2), have the potential to provide accurate assessments of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) symptoms in military personnel by simulating complex military scenarios while objectively measuring the user's movements with embedded motion sensors. The aim of this project was to determine if biomechanical measures of marching and squatting, derived from the HL2 motion sensors, were statistically equivalent, within 5%, to metrics derived from the gold-standard three-dimensional motion capture (MoCap) system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four adults (18-45 years; 34 males) completed a squatting and a marching task under single- (motor) and dual-task (motor + cognitive) conditions. Positional data from the HL2 and MoCap were simultaneously collected during the tasks and used to calculate and compare biomechanical outcomes. The HL2's augmented reality capabilities were utilized to deliver the cognitive component of the marching dual task.

RESULTS

Equivalence testing indicated the HL2 and MoCap measures were within 5% in all squatting metrics-trial time, squat duration, squat velocity, squat depth, and dwell time. Marching metrics, including trial time, step count, stepping rate, and step interval, were also equivalent between the two systems. The mean reaction time for responses during the Stroop test was 810 (125) milliseconds per response.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical outcomes characterizing performance during two common military movements, squatting and marching, were equivalent between the HL2 and MoCap systems in healthy adults. Squatting and marching are two military-relevant tasks that require strength, motor coordination, and balance to perform, all of which are known to be affected by mTBI. Taken together, the data provide support for using the HL2 platform to deliver military-specific assessment scenarios and accurately measure performance during these activities. Utilizing objective and quantitative measures of motor function may enhance the management of military mTBI and reduce unnecessary risk to service members.

Interadministrator Reliability of a Modified Instrumented Push and Release Test of Reactive Balance

CONTEXT

Traditional assessments of reactive balance require sophisticated instrumentation to ensure objective, highly repeatable paradigms. This instrumentation is clinically impractical. The Push and Release test (P&R) is a well-validated clinical test that examines reactive balance, and the application of wearable inertial measurement units (IMU) enables sensitive and objective assessment of this clinically feasible test. The P&R relies on administrator experience and may be susceptible to interadministration reliability concerns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interadministrator reliability of objective outcomes from an instrumented, modified version of the P&R test.

DESIGN

Crossover interadministrator design.

METHODS

Twenty healthy adults (20-35 y) completed the P&R in 4 directions with 2 different administrators. Measures quantified using IMUs included step latency, step length, and time to stability. Lean angle (LA) at release was used as a measure of administration consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimate was used to assess interadministrator reliability in each direction. To determine consistency of LA within and across administrators, we calculated the SDs for each rater by direction and the interadministrator reliability of LA using ICC.

RESULTS

Across individual directions, the ICC for agreement between raters ranged from .16 to .39 for step latency, from .52 to .62 for time to stability, and from .48 to .84 for step length. Summary metrics across all 4 directions produced higher ICC values. There was poor to moderate consistency in administration based on LA, but LA did not significantly affect any of the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The modified P&R yields moderate interadministrator reliability and high validity. Summary metrics over all 4 directions (the maximum step latency, the median time to stability, and the median step length) are likely more reliable than direction-specific scores. Variations in body size should also be considered when comparing populations.