Robotic Approach to Ureteral Endometriosis: Surgical Features and Perioperative Outcomes

Robotic surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis: is it time to take a step forward?

Endometriosis is a chronic debilitating disease that affects nearly 10% of women of the reproductive age. Although the treatment modalities of endometriosis are numerous, surgical excision of the endometriotic implants and nodules remains the sole cytoreductive approach. Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis was proven to be beneficial in improving the postoperative pain and fertility. Moreover, it was also proved to be safe and efficient in treating the visceral localization of deep endometriosis, such as urinary and colorectal endometriosis. More recently, robotic-assisted surgery gained attention in the field of endometriosis surgery. Although the robotic technology provides a 3D vision of the surgical field and 7-degree of freedom motion, the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of this approach are yet to be determined. With this paper, we aim to review the available evidence regarding the role of robotic surgery in the management of endometriosis along with the current practices in the field.

Robotic assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis

Deep infiltrative endometriosis is a condition affecting up to 15 % of women of childbearing age, defined by extra uterine location of endometrial like tissues. The symptoms of endometriosis range from severe dysmenorrhea to infertility, chronic pelvic pain, bowel dysfunction and urinary tract involvement to name the most common. Endometriosis has an impact on the quality of life of patients, with personal and social consequences. Although medical treatment is indicated in the first instance, surgery may be necessary. Standard laparoscopy has become the gold standard for this surgery. However, surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis is known to be highly complex, and the significant development of robotic assistance in recent years has had an impact on the evolution of surgical practice. This comprehensive review of the literature provides an overview of the contributions of robotic surgery in the field of endometriosis and gives an insight into the next steps in its development.

The current role of robotic surgery in endometriosis management

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects approximately 10%-15% of women of childbearing age. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred surgical approach. Recently, robotic surgery has been used for benign gynecologic surgery, but its role in the treatment of endometriosis is still unknown.

AREAS COVERED

We included studies that evaluated the outcomes of robotic surgery for endometriosis. Using the keywords 'endometriosis' and 'robotics', a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed in July 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

Robotic surgery for endometriosis has similar outcomes as conventional laparoscopy, with no evidence of increased complication rates. Despite the non-inferiority of the surgical route, the associated costs of robotic surgery limit its availability. Rapid development of robot-assisted surgery necessitates long-term prospective randomized controlled trials. However, the limitations of robotic surgery should not be overlooked. If robotic surgery can facilitate the spread of minimally invasive surgery, it will be necessary to evaluate the cost, availability, complexity of the lesions, and most importantly, the results of patient satisfaction and values of value-based medicine.

Laparoscopic Treatment of Ureteral Endometriosis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature for the preoperative clinical characteristics, surgical findings, and outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgical treatment of ureteral endometriosis (UE).

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Scopus databases.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, studies in English language that assessed UE treated surgically by laparoscopy published between 2008 and 2020 were selected.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

In an initial search, 1313 articles were identified, 193 in PubMed and 1120 in Scopus databases. A total of 1291 articles that did not meet eligibility criteria were excluded. The remaining 22 studies were included in the final qualitative analysis, with a total of 1337 patients. Data on preoperative patient's characteristics, preoperative imaging examinations, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications were abstracted by 1 author. The descriptive nature of included studies prevented the performance of meta-analysis. Preoperative symptoms included dysmenorrhea (76.3%), pelvic pain (59.6%), dyspareunia (46.2%), lower urinary tract symptoms (21.3%), and ureteral obstructive symptoms (9.9%). Intraoperative findings showed that UE lesions were left-sided in 55% of the cases, right-sided in 28.9% of the cases, and bilateral in 8.7% of the cases. Ureterolysis alone or before another technique was performed in 69.1% of the cases, ureteral resection followed by ureteroureteral anastomosis in 6%, ureteroneocystostomy after ureteral resection in 21%, and nephrectomy in 0.45% of the patients. Double-J ureteral stent placement was reported in 33.3% of the cases. Concomitant resection of the bladder owing to endometriosis involvement was performed in 15.5% of the cases. The prevalence of ureteral injury was 3.1%. Postoperative complications included ureteral fistula (2.8%), ureteral stenosis (24.2%), persistence/recurrence of UE (3.8%), and reoperation for fistula and/or stricture treatment (3.9%).

CONCLUSION

UE is associated with common endometriosis pain symptoms and a low rate of lower urinary tract symptoms. The standard surgical technique for UE treatment is not yet a consensus; however, the laparoscopic approach with previous ureterolysis, leaving ureteral resection only for refractory cases, seems to be a safe and effective treatment, with improvement of symptoms and few intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Robotic treatment for urinary tract endometriosis: preliminary results and surgical details in a high-volume single-Institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

Aim of the study was to present the surgical techniques and the postoperative outcomes in women treated with robotic excision for deep endometriosis involving the urinary tract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively recorded clinical data of women consecutively undergoing minimally invasive treatment for complex endometriosis involving urinary tract in our center between January 2012 and June 2018. All the patients received a preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation with the general surgeon, the gynecologist and the urologist due to the frequent concomitant involvement of bowel and genital system. Patients undergoing robotic surgery were treated with the Si or Xi da Vinci surgical system.

RESULTS

A total of 74 consecutive patients were enrolled. Twenty-eight (37.8%) patients underwent conventional laparoscopy and 46 (62.2%) robotic surgery. Only patients treated with robotic approach were considered for the final analyses. Overall, 17 (36.9%) patients were treated with partial cystectomy, 13 (28.3%) with ureteral reimplantation, 10 (21.7%) patients were treated with ureteral lysis, 4 (8.7%) with removal of bladder endometrial node without opening the mucosa layer and 2 (4.3%) with ureteral end-to-end anastomosis. Concomitant involvement of bowel and genital system was registered in 14 (30.4%) and 32 (69.5%) patients, respectively. No conversions to laparotomy were recorded. Overall, 5 (10.9%) patients experienced postoperative complications, of which only one was a major complication (Clavien 3b). At a median follow-up of 31.3 (IQR 17.6-43.3) months, 4 (8.7%) patients experienced disease recurrence at the level of urinary tract.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic excision of urological endometriosis represents a safe and effective treatment option, since a limited rate of surgical complications was recorded even in cases of multi-organ disease.