1
|
Tanaka Y, Hino H, Shiomi A, Uehara K, Watanabe J, Nishikawa T, Ueno H, Kinugasa Y, Kawai K, Ajioka Y. Efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection for local control of rectal cancer: A multicenter study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:631-638. [PMID: 38957561 PMCID: PMC11216789 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer by comparing the local control in patients with and without pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Methods We included 189 patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLND at 13 institutions between 2017 and 2019. Patients with and without pathological LLNM were defined as the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. Propensity score-matching helped to balance the basic characteristics of both groups. The incidences of local recurrence (LR) and lateral lymph node recurrence (LLNR) were compared between the groups. Results In the entire cohort, 39 of the 189 patients had pathological LLNM. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 18.3% and 4.0% (p = 0.01) and 7.7% and 3.3% (p = 0.22) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the data from 62 patients were analyzed. No significant differences in LR or LLNR were observed between both groups. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 16.4% and 9.8% (p = 0.46) and 9.7% and 9.8% (p = 0.99) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. Conclusion LLND would lead to comparable local control in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups if the clinicopathological characteristics except for LLNM are similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Tanaka
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalSunto‐gunJapan
| | - Hitoshi Hino
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalSunto‐gunJapan
| | - Akio Shiomi
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalSunto‐gunJapan
| | - Kay Uehara
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological CenterYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Takeshi Nishikawa
- Division of Gastroenterological SurgerySaitama Cancer CenterInaJapan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of SurgeryNational Defense Medical CollegeTokorozawaJapan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryTokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Division of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental ScienceNiigata UniversityNiigataJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chaouch MA, Hussain MI, Carneiro da Costa A, Mazzotta A, Krimi B, Gouader A, Cotte E, Khan J, Oweira H. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304031. [PMID: 38809911 PMCID: PMC11135705 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lateral pelvic node dissection (LPND) poses significant technical challenges. Despite the advent of robotic surgery, determining the optimal minimally invasive approach remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between robotic total mesorectal excision with LPND (R-LPND) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with LPND (L-LPND). METHODS This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) guidelines. Utilizing the RevMan 5.3.5 statistical package from the Cochrane Collaboration, a random-effects model was employed. RESULTS Six eligible studies involving 652 patients (316 and 336 in the R-LPND and L-LPND groups, respectively) were retrieved. The robotic approach demonstrated favourable outcomes compared with the laparoscopic approach, manifesting in lower morbidity rates, reduced urinary complications, shorter hospital stays, and a higher number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes. However, longer operative time was associated with the robotic approach. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding major complications, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal infection, neurological complications, LPND time, overall recurrence, and local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In summary, the robotic approach is a safe and feasible alternative for Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with LPND in advanced rectal cancer. Notably, it is associated with lower morbidity, particularly a reduction in urinary complications, a shorter hospital stay and increased number of harvested lateral pelvic nodes. The trade-off for these benefits is a longer operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of visceral and digestive surgery, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
- Department of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alessandro Mazzotta
- Department of Surgery, M. G. Vannini Hospital, Istituto Figlie Di San Camillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Bassem Krimi
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Amine Gouader
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Eddy Cotte
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jim Khan
- Department of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Hani Oweira
- Department of Surgery, Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sposito C, Maspero M, Cucchetti A, Mazzaferro V. A snapshot on current approaches to lymphadenectomy in liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: results from an international survey. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01852-0. [PMID: 38713394 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01852-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
The use of lymphadenectomy (LND) during resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still debated, leading to differing practices in different centers and countries. The aim of this study was to assess such differences. A survey on LND for ICC was distributed to the members of the International Hepato-PancreatoBiliary Association (IHPBA) and the Italian Chapter of IHPBA (AICEP). Two-hundred thirty-four surgeons completed the survey (88% males; median age 46 years). Preoperative nodal staging was deemed mandatory/very important by 65%. Adequate LND was defined as hepatoduodenal ligament LND by 33%, LND at specific nodal stations by 28% and retrieval of > 5 nodes by 28%. The decision to perform LND was influenced by comorbidities (48%), chronic liver disease (38%) and satellitosis (32%). Most participants modify perioperative management in case of clinically positive nodes, 50% stating they would give neoadjuvant therapy. The role of LND in clinically node negative disease was adequate staging for 88%, survival benefit for 50.5% and clinical trials eligibility for 18.5%. Our survey confirms heterogeneity in the evaluation of role and extent of LND for ICC, how this relates to subjective perception of importance of LND, and need of a systematic approach in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Sposito
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Marianna Maspero
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Morgagni, Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaval G, Dagoglu Kartal MG, Azamat S, Cingoz E, Ertas G, Karaman S, Kurtuldu B, Keskin M, Berker N, Karabulut S, Oral EN, Dagoglu Sakin N. Evaluating complete response prediction rates in locally advanced rectal cancer with different radiomics segmentation approaches. Pathol Oncol Res 2024; 30:1611744. [PMID: 38694706 PMCID: PMC11061551 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Studies examining prediction of complete response (CR) in locally advanced rectum cancer (LARC) from pre/post chemoradiotherapy (CRT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are performed mostly with segmentations of the tumor, whereas only in two studies segmentation included tumor and mesorectum. Additionally, pelvic extramesorectal region, which is included in the clinical target volume (CTV) of radiotherapy, may contain information. Therefore, we aimed to compare predictive rates of radiomics analysis with features extracted from segmentations of tumor, tumor+mesorectum, and CTV. Methods and materials Ninety-three LARC patients who underwent CRT in our institution between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively scanned. Patients were divided into CR and non-CR groups. Tumor, tumor+mesorectum and CTV were segmented on T2 preCRT MRI images. Extracted features were compared for best area under the curve (AUC) of CR prediction with 15 machine-learning models. Results CR was observed in 25 patients (26.8%), of whom 13 had pathological, and 12 had clinical complete response. For tumor, tumor+mesorectum and CTV segmentations, the best AUC were 0.84, 0.81, 0.77 in the training set and 0.85, 0.83 and 0.72 in the test set, respectively; sensitivity and specificity for the test set were 76%, 90%, 76% and 71%, 67% and 62%, respectively. Conclusion Although the highest AUC result is obtained from the tumor segmentation, the highest accuracy and sensitivity are detected with tumor+mesorectum segmentation and these findings align with previous studies, suggesting that the mesorectum contains valuable insights for CR. The lowest result is obtained with CTV segmentation. More studies with mesorectum and pelvic nodal regions included in segmentation are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gizem Kaval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | - Sena Azamat
- Department of Radiology, Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Eda Cingoz
- Department of Radiology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Gokhan Ertas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Sule Karaman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Basak Kurtuldu
- Department of Emergency, Hackalibaba Hospital, Trabzon, Türkiye
| | - Metin Keskin
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Neslihan Berker
- Department of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Senem Karabulut
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ethem Nezih Oral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Nergiz Dagoglu Sakin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
İsmail E, Kutlu B, Acar Hİ, Yörübulut M, Akkoca M, Kocaay AF, Elhan A, Kuzu MA. Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma: A Step-by-Step Description of Surgical Anatomical Planes During Cadaveric Dissection and Minimally Invasive Surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:101-107. [PMID: 38134383 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Total mesorectal excision (TME) is accepted as gold standard method in rectal cancer globally. But there is no standard for lateral lymph nodes. Combination of neoadjuvant treatment plus lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in select patients might be a promising method. Our purpose is to describe the anatomic landmarks of LLND on cadavers and minimally invasive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Local advanced rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis are accepted as an indication of neoadjuvant treatment. LLND was performed according to preoperative imaging after radiochemotherapy. RESULTS Twenty-eight (10.5%) of 267 patients with rectal cancer who had suspected lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent LLND in addition to TME after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Eight of them had LLNM. Three patients had bilateral LLND and only 1 had LLNM. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 6. The rates of LLNM increased with the presence of poor prognosis markers. One regional and 1 distant recurrence were detected in patients who had no LLN metastasis compared with2 regional and 4 distant recurrences in the LLN-positive group. CONCLUSIONS Local advanced rectal cancer cases may benefit from LLND, but it does not appear to have an effect on overall survival. There is no consensus whether size and/or morphologic criteria in MRI are the ideal guide for LLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erkin İsmail
- Acibadem Hospital; Departments of General Surgery and Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University; SBU Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Watanabe J, Ohya H, Sakai J, Suwa Y, Goto K, Nakagawa K, Ozawa M, Ishibe A, Suwa H, Kunisaki C, Endo I. Long-term outcomes of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for clinical stage II/III middle-lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:759-767. [PMID: 36773172 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02761-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously reported that indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI)-guided laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) was able to increase the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes without impairing functional preservation. However, the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND have not been evaluated. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term outcomes of ICG-FI-guided laparoscopic LPLND to conventional laparoscopic LPLND without ICG-FI. METHODS This was a retrospective, multi-institutional study with propensity score matching. The study population included consecutive patients with middle-low rectal cancer (clinical stage II to III) who underwent laparoscopic LPLND between January 2013 and February 2018. The main evaluation items in this study were the 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), local recurrence rate, and lateral local recurrence (LLR) rate. RESULTS A total of 172 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic LPLND were included in this study. After propensity score matching, 58 patients were matched in each of the ICG-FI and non-ICG-FI groups. There were no substantial differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The ICG-FI group and non-ICG-FI group included 40 and 38 women and had a median age of 65 (IQR 60-72) and 66 (IQR 60-73) years, respectively. The median follow-up for all patients was 63.7 (IQR 51.3-76.8) months. The estimated respective 3-year overall survival, RFS, and local recurrence rates were 93.1%, 70.7%, and 5.2% in the ICG-FI group and 85.9%, 71.7%, and 12.8% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.201, 0.653, 0.391). The 3-year cumulative LLR rate was 0% in the ICG-FI group and 9.3% in the non-ICG-FI group (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that laparoscopic LPLND combined with ICG-FI was able to decrease the LLR rate. It appears that ICG-FI could contribute to improving the quality of laparoscopic LPLND and strengthening local control of the lateral pelvis. TRIALS REGISTRATION This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000041372 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Cho, Minami-Ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan.
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
| | - H Ohya
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - J Sakai
- Department of Surgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan
| | - Y Suwa
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Cho, Minami-Ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan
| | - K Goto
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Cho, Minami-Ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan
| | - K Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - M Ozawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - A Ishibe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - H Suwa
- Department of Surgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan
| | - C Kunisaki
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-Cho, Minami-Ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan
| | - I Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sluckin TC, Hazen SMJA, Horsthuis K, Beets-Tan RGH, Aalbers AGJ, Beets GL, Boerma EJG, Borstlap J, van Breest Smallenburg V, Burger JWA, Crolla RMPH, Daniëls-Gooszen AW, Davids PHP, Dunker MS, Fabry HFJ, Furnée EJB, van Gils RAH, de Haas RJ, Hoogendoorn S, van Koeverden S, de Korte FI, Oosterling SJ, Peeters KCMJ, Posma LAE, Pultrum BB, Rothbarth J, Rutten HJT, Schasfoort RA, Schreurs WH, Simons PCG, Smits AB, Talsma AK, The GYM, van Tilborg F, Tuynman JB, Vanhooymissen IJS, van de Ven AWH, Verdaasdonk EGG, Vermaas M, Vliegen RFA, Vogelaar FJ, de Vries M, Vroemen JC, van Vugt ST, Westerterp M, van Westreenen HL, de Wilt JHW, van der Zaag ES, Zimmerman DDE, Marijnen CAM, Tanis PJ, Kusters M. Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5472-5485. [PMID: 37340200 PMCID: PMC10409808 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13460-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. METHODS Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either 'node-picking' (the removal of an individual LLN) or 'partial regional node dissection' (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection. RESULTS Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2-2.5, p = 0.874). CONCLUSION Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania C Sluckin
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne-Marije J A Hazen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evert-Jan G Boerma
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap Borstlap
- Department of Radiology, Treant Zorggroep, Hoogeveen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul H P Davids
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michalda S Dunker
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, NWZ Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Hans F J Fabry
- Department of Surgery, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Edgar J B Furnée
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robbert J de Haas
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Fleur I de Korte
- Department of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lisanne A E Posma
- Department of Surgery, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, the Netherlands
| | - Bareld B Pultrum
- Department of Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Rothbarth
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Harm J T Rutten
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Petra C G Simons
- Department of Radiology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Anke B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Aaldert K Talsma
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - G Y Mireille The
- Department of Radiology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Fiek van Tilborg
- Department of Radiology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge J S Vanhooymissen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Roy F A Vliegen
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - F Jeroen Vogelaar
- Department of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joy C Vroemen
- Department of Radiology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marinke Westerterp
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - David D E Zimmerman
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Su H, Xu Z, Bao M, Luo S, Liang J, Pei W, Guan X, Liu Z, Jiang Z, Zhang M, Zhao Z, Jin W, Zhou H. Lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation: can it be a powerful supplement tool for predicting the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:4088-4096. [PMID: 36997652 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10033-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An innovative instrument for laparoscopy using indocyanine green (ICG) allows easy detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs). Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of lateral pelvic SLN biopsy (SLNB) using ICG fluorescence navigation in advanced lower rectal cancer and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of this technique to predict the status of LPLN. METHODS From April 1, 2017 to December 1, 2020, we conducted lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) in 23 patients with advanced low rectal cancer who presented with LPLN but without LPLN enlargement. Data regarding clinical characteristics, surgical and pathological outcomes, lymph node findings, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed. RESULTS We successfully performed the surgery using fluorescence navigation. One patient underwent bilateral LLND and 22 patients underwent unilateral LLND. The lateral pelvic SLN were clearly fluorescent before dissection in 21 patients. Lateral pelvic SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 3 patients and negative in 18 patients by frozen pathological examination. Among the 21 patients in whom lateral pelvic SLN was detected, the dissected lateral pelvic non-SLNs were all negative. All dissected LPLNs were negative in two patients without fluorescent lateral pelvic SLN. CONCLUSION This study indicated that lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation shows promise as a safe and feasible procedure for advanced lower rectal cancer with good accuracy, and no false-negative cases were found. No metastasis in SLNB seemed to reflect all negative LPLN metastases, and this technique can replace preventive LLND for advanced lower rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Su
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Zheng Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Mandula Bao
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shou Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xu Guan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Mingguang Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhixun Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Weisen Jin
- Department of Anorectal Diseases, Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, 100039, People's Republic of China.
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lateral Pelvic Sidewall Nodes. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:355-357. [PMID: 36728599 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
CASE SUMMARY A 68-year-old woman presented with rectal bleeding, urgency, and tenesmus. A digital rectal examination confirmed a craggy mass infiltrating into the sphincter complex. Follow-up colonoscopy noted a low-rectal tumor (3 cm from the dentate), and histopathology confirmed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Subsequent staging with MRI confirmed a 5-cm circumferential low-rectal neoplasm with extramural vascular invasion and threatened circumferential resection margin. The neoplasm abutted the posterior vaginal wall and was invading the internal sphincter complex. Four enlarged mesorectal nodes (>7 mm) and several enlarged right pelvic sidewall nodes (largest at 17 mm) were also observed. There was no evidence of distant disease. The patient underwent long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Restaging showed a good treatment response with some regression and no involvement/encroachment of the vagina. All the mesorectal nodes had reduced in size (~4 mm), and all but one of the right pelvic sidewall nodes had also decreased in size. However, 1 pelvic sidewall node (obturator fossa) still remained at 10 mm. After the tumor board discussion, a decision to proceed to abdominoperineal resection with right sidewall clearance was made. Final histopathology confirmed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with no mesorectal nodal involvement (19 nodes sampled), and 1 of 7 sidewall nodes had evidence of metastatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lim BL, Park IJ, Kim YI, Kim CW, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Lim SB. Difference in prognostic impact of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis between pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Treat Res 2023; 104:205-213. [PMID: 37051159 PMCID: PMC10083348 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The prognostic significance and treatment of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (mLPLN) in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) are not well understood. In this study, we evaluated the impact of mLPLN identified in imaging modality on outcomes. Methods Between January 2008 and December 2016, 1,535 patients who underwent radical resection following nCRT were identified. The association between mLPLN and disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and pelvic recurrence-free survival (PRFS) was analyzed, along with risk factors associated with OS and DFS. Results Overall, 329 (21.4%) of the 1,535 patients experienced disease recurrence; 71 (4.6%) had local recurrence, 25 (1.6%) had pelvic recurrence, and 312 (20.3%) had distant recurrence. The pre- and post-nCRT mLPLN (-) groups had better DFS, LRFS, PRFS, and OS than the (+) groups. LPLN sampling (LPLNs) was implemented in 24.0% of the pre-nCRT mLPLN (+) group and in 28.8% of the post-nCRT mLPLN (+) group. There was no significant difference in OS and LRFS between LPLNs group and no LPLNs group in pre- and post-nCRT mLPLN (+) groups. Pre-nCRT mLPLN was associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; P = 0.009) and post-nCRT mLPLN was associated with poor DFS (HR, 1.49; P = 0.002). Conclusion Pre- and post-nCRT mLPLN (+) have different prognostic effects. Post-nCRT mLPLN appears to be more important for disease control. However, pre-nCRT mLPLN should not be disregarded when devising a treatment strategy since it is an independent risk factor for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byeo Lee Lim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ja Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Il Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Wook Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Lyul Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Sik Yoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Byung Lim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peparini N. Oncological outcome after lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for low rectal carcinoma: not only an N-status matter. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:54-58. [PMID: 36190012 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Tumour deposits (TDs), novel pathological entities, should be considered when estimating the regional and systemic spread of rectal carcinoma and formulating treatment strategies. In fact, TDs may have more severe prognostic impact than lymph node positivity or the lymph node ratio. The assessment of the presence of TDs can be performed only through accurate postoperative pathological examination; however, the detection of TDs is not part of any of the procedures currently used to assess preoperative or intraoperative staging. This review aims to analyse and discuss the impact of TDs on the oncological outcome of patients who undergo surgery for advanced low rectal carcinoma. No prospective study has evaluated the impact of lateral pelvic TDs on oncological outcomes following total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Although adequate total mesorectal excision allows for the excision of intramesorectal TDs, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection cannot guarantee the removal of lateral pelvic TDs; moreover, it remains to be determined whether surgical excision of lateral pelvic TDs can impact long-term outcomes. However, the identification of lateral pelvic TDs strengthens the 'staging effect' and limits the 'therapeutic effect' of lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, supporting the rationale for the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. When evaluating the oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, the impact of lateral pelvic TDs should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Peparini
- Distretto 3, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 6, Ciampino (Rome), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kawai K, Shiomi A, Miura T, Uehara K, Watanabe J, Kazama S, Ueno H, Sakamoto K, Kinugasa Y, Takahashi K, Hida K, Hamada M, Ishihara S, Sugihara K. Optimal diagnostic criteria for lateral lymph node dissection using magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter prospective study. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:206-213. [PMID: 36069323 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND LLND in cases with suspected lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis has been focused on as a novel treatment strategy in recent years. However, the optimal indication for LLND in rectal cancer patients has not been determined. This study aimed to establish the optimal indication for lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in patients with rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS A total of 209 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLND in 13 hospitals were prospectively registered. By matching the sizes of the harvested LNs and those in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the pathological outcome of each LN was confirmed one-by-one. Using parameters of the LLNs in MRI, the optimal diagnostic criteria for LLND were established. RESULTS Of 3241 harvested LLNs, including 83 metastatic nodes, 1010 (31.1%) were visualized on MRI. Although all parameters assessed showed strong correlations with the presence of metastasis, none of these parameters could discriminate metastatic LLNs from non-metastatic nodes with sufficient sensitivity. However, by using the combination of long axis and short/long ratio in pretreatment MRI, we could establish optimal criteria for LLND. The sensitivity and specificity of the criteria for LLN metastasis were 94.3% and 40.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, we established novel criteria for LLND in rectal cancer patients using MRI. Our criteria will be of great clinical use in determining indications for LLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Shiomi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Japan
| | - Takuya Miura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Kay Uehara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Kazama
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Ina, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Sakamoto
- Department of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Takahashi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Madoka Hamada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Sugihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoo GS, Park HC, Yu JI. Clinical implication and management of rectal cancer with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: A radiation oncologist's perspective. Front Oncol 2022; 12:960527. [PMID: 36568216 PMCID: PMC9768025 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide. With the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT), intrapelvic local control has been remarkably improved. However, lateral pelvic recurrence remains problematic, especially in patients with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN). LPLN dissection has been applied for the management of LPLN metastasis, mainly in Japan and other Eastern countries, while the role of NCRT is more emphasized and LPLN dissection is performed in very limited cases in Western countries. However, the optimal management strategy for patients with rectal cancer with suspicious LPLN metastasis has not been determined. Herein, we review the latest studies on the optimal management of LPLN metastasis to suggest the most appropriate treatment policies according to current evidence and discuss future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeong Il Yu
- *Correspondence: Jeong Il Yu, ; Hee Chul Park,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dai JY, Han ZJ, Wang JD, Liu BS, Liu JY, Wang YC. Short-term outcomes of near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-lower rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1039928. [PMID: 36438036 PMCID: PMC9684625 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1039928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) is limited by complex neurovascular bundles in the narrow pelvic sidewall and various post-operative complications. Indocyanine green (ICG) has been applied to increase the number of harvested lymph nodes and reduce the injury of irrelevant vessels in patients with rectal cancer. However, few studies on the recurrence rate of ICG fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic LPND were reported. This retrospective study enrolled 50 middle- low rectal cancer patients who were treated by LPND. After propensity score matching, 20 patients were matched in each of the indocyanine green (ICG) guided imaging group (ICG group) and non-ICG guided imaging group (non-ICG group). The average follow-up time was 13.5 months (12-15 months). Our results showed that the total number of harvested lymph nodes in the ICG group was significantly higher than that in the non-ICG group (P < 0.05), and intraoperative blood loss and post-operative hospital stay times in the ICG group were less than those in the non-ICG group (P < 0.05). After 12 months of follow-up, no residual lymph node and local tumor recurrence were found for patients in the ICG group. Four patients in the non-ICG group detected residual lymph nodes at the 3-month visit. Our findings highlighted the importance of ICG fluorescence-guided imaging in LPND because it has unique advantages in improving the number of lymph node dissections, surgical accuracy, and decreasing the residual lymph nodes and local tumor recurrence. In addition, ICG fluorescence guidance technology can effectively shorten the operation time, and it is simple to operate, which is worth popularizing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Yu Dai
- Department of Enterochirurgia, Fengrun District People's Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sluckin TC, Hazen SMJA, Horsthuis K, Beets-Tan RGH, Marijnen CAM, Tanis PJ, Kusters M. Retrospective evaluation of national MRI reporting quality for lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients and concordance with prospective re-evaluation following additional training. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:171. [PMID: 36264440 PMCID: PMC9583997 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The presence and size of lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are important factors influencing treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Awareness of the clinical relevance and describing LLNs in MRI reports is therefore essential. This study assessed whether LLNs were mentioned in primary MRI reports at a national level and investigated the concordance with standardised re-review. Methods This national, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study included 1096 patients from 60 hospitals treated in 2016 for primary cT3-4 rectal cancer ≤ 8 cm from the anorectal junction. Abdominal radiologists re-reviewed all MR images following a 2-h training regarding LLNs. Results Re-review of MR images identified that 41.0% of enlarged (≥ 7 mm) LLNs were not mentioned in primary MRI reports. A contradictory anatomical location was stated for 73.2% of all LLNs and a different size (≥/< 7 mm) for 41.7%. In total, 49.4% of all cases did not mention LLNs in primary MRI reports. Reporting LLNs was associated with stage (cT3N0 44.3%, T3N+/T4 52.8%, p = 0.013), cN stage (N0 44.1%, N1 48.6%, N2 59.5%, p < 0.001), hospital type (non-teaching 34.6%, teaching 52.2%, academic 53.2% p = 0.006) and annual rectal cancer resection volumes (low 34.8%, medium 47.7%, high 57.3% p < 0.001). For LLNs present according to original MRI reports (n = 226), 64.2% also mentioned a short-axis size, 52.7% an anatomical location and 25.2% whether it was deemed suspicious. Conclusions Almost half of the primary MRI reports for rectal cancer patients treated in the Netherlands in 2016 did not mention LLNs. A significant portion of enlarged LLNs identified during re-review were also not mentioned originally, with considerable discrepancies for location and size. These results imply insufficient awareness and indicate the need for templates, education and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania C Sluckin
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne-Marije J A Hazen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Universiteitssingel 40, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LUMC, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Crafa F, Vanella S, Catalano OA, Pomykala KL, Baiamonte M. Role of one-step nucleic acid amplification in colorectal cancer lymph node metastases detection. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:4019-4043. [PMID: 36157105 PMCID: PMC9403438 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Current histopathological staging procedures in colorectal cancer (CRC) depend on midline division of the lymph nodes (LNs) with one section of hematoxylin and eosin staining. Cancer cells outside this transection line may be missed, which could lead to understaging of Union for International Cancer Control Stage II high-risk patients. The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay has emerged as a rapid molecular diagnostic tool for LN metastases detection. It is a molecular technique that can analyze the entire LN tissue using a reverse-transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction to detect tumor-specific cytokeratin 19 mRNA. Our findings suggest that the OSNA assay has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting metastatic LNs in CRC and a high negative predictive value. OSNA is a standardized, observer-independent technique, which may lead to more accurate staging. It has been suggested that in stage II CRC, the upstaging can reach 25% and these patients can access postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, intraoperative OSNA sentinel node evaluation may allow early CRC to be treated with organ-preserving surgery, while in more advanced-stage disease, a tailored lymphadenectomy can be performed considering the presence of aberrant lymphatic drainage and skip metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Crafa
- Division of General and Surgical Oncology, St. Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Center of National Excellence and High Specialty, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Serafino Vanella
- Division of General and Surgical Oncology, St. Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Center of National Excellence and High Specialty, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Kelsey L Pomykala
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen 45141, Germany
| | - Mario Baiamonte
- Division of General and Surgical Oncology, St. Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Center of National Excellence and High Specialty, Avellino 83100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Near-Infrared Imaging Using Indocyanine Green for Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II/III Middle-Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:885-893. [PMID: 34840301 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The examination of the efficacy of near-infrared imaging using indocyanine green in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection remains insufficient. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine whether near-infrared imaging contributed to an increase in the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. DESIGN This was a retrospective, multi-institutional study with propensity score matching. SETTINGS We conducted this study within the framework of the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group in Japan. PATIENTS The study population included consecutive patients with middle-low rectal cancer (clinical stage II to III) who underwent laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection between January 2013 and February 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes was compared in laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection with and without near-infrared imaging. RESULTS A total of 172 eligible patients were included; 84 of these patients underwent laparoscopic surgery with near-infrared imaging. After propensity score matching, 58 patients were matched in each of the near-infrared and the non-near-infrared groups. The operation time in the near-infrared group was significantly longer than that in the non-near-infrared group (426 vs 369 min), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the near-infrared group was significantly smaller than that in the non-near-infrared group (13 vs 110 mL). The total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes in the near-infrared group was significantly higher than that in the non-near-infrared group (14 vs 9). There were no significant differences in the postoperative complication rates of the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS The limitations of the present study include its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection combined with near-infrared imaging could increase the total number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes without impairing functional preservation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B800.This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000041372 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).IMÁGENES CASI-INFRARROJAS UTILIZANDO VERDE DE INDOCIANINA EN LA DISECCIÓN LAPAROSCÓPICA DE GANGLIOS LINFÁTICOS PÉLVICOS LATERALES EN CASOS DE CÁNCER DE RECTO MEDIO-INFERIOR DE ESTADIO CLÍNICO II / III: ESTUDIO DE COHORTES CON PUNTUACIÓN DE PROPENSIÓNANTECEDENTES:El examen de la eficacia de las imágenes casi-infrarrojas utilizando le verde de indocianina en la disección laparoscópica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales sigue siendo insuficiente.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar si las imágenes casi-infrarrojas contribuyeron a un aumento en el número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales recolectados durante su disección laparoscópica.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo, multi-institucional con emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión.AJUSTES:Estudio realizado dentro el marco establecido por el Grupo de Oncología Clínica de Yokohama, Japón.PACIENTES:La población estudiada incluyó pacientes consecutivos con cáncer de recto medio-bajo (estadio clínico II a III) que se sometieron a una disección laparoscópica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales entre enero de 2013 y febrero de 2018.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS MEDIDAS:El número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales extraídos se comparó en la disección laparoscópica de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales con y sin imágenes casi-infrarrojas.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 172 pacientes elegibles; 84 de estos pacientes se sometieron a cirugía laparoscópica con imágenes casi-infrarrojas. Después del emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión, 58 pacientes fueron emparejados en cada uno de los grupos de luz casi-infrarroja y los sin luz. El tiempo de operación en el grupo de luz casi-infrarroja fue significativamente más largo que en el grupo sin luz (426 frente a 369 min), y la cantidad de pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria en el grupo de luz casi-infrarroja fue significativamente menor que en el grupo sin luz (13 frente a 110 ml). El número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales recolectados en el grupo de luz casi-infrarroja fue significativamente mayor que en el grupo sin luz (14 frente a 9). No hubo diferencias significativas en las tasas de complicaciones posoperatorias de los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del presente estudio incluyen su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio reveló que la disección laparoscópica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales combinada con imágenes casi-infrarrojas podría aumentar el número total de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales recolectados sin afectar la preservación funcional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B800. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo)Este estudio se registró en el Registro de Ensayos Clínicos de Japón como UMIN000041372 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).
Collapse
|
18
|
Kroon HM, Hoogervorst LA, Hanna-Rivero N, Traeger L, Dudi-Venkata NN, Bedrikovetski S, Kusters M, Chang GJ, Thomas ML, Sammour T. Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term oncological outcomes of lateral lymph node dissection for metastatic nodes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1475-1482. [PMID: 35568607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard Western management of rectal cancers with pre-treatment metastatic lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) is neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). In recent years, there is growing interest in performing an additional lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate long-term oncological outcomes of nCRT followed by TME with or without LLND in patients with pre-treatment metastatic LLNs. METHODS PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched to identify comparative studies reporting long-term oncological outcomes in pre-treatment metastatic LLNs of nCRT followed by TME and LLND (LLND+) vs. nCRT followed by TME only (LLND-). Newcastle-Ottawa risk-of-bias scale was used. Outcomes of interest included local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Summary meta-analysis of aggregate outcomes was performed. RESULTS Seven studies, including 946 patients, were analysed. One (1/7) study was of good-quality after risk-of-bias analysis. Five-year LR rates after LLND+ were reduced (range 3-15%) compared to LLND- (11-27%; RR = 0.40, 95%CI [0.25-0.62], p < 0.0001). Five-year DFS was not significantly different after LLND+ (range 61-78% vs. 46-79% for LLND-; RR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.51-1.02], p = 0.143), and neither was five-year OS (range 69-91% vs. 72-80%; RR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.45-1.14], p = 0.163). CONCLUSION In rectal cancers with pre-treatment metastatic LLNs, nCRT followed by an additional LLND during TME reduces local recurrence risk, but does not impact disease-free or overall survival. Due to the low quality of current data, large prospective studies will be required to further determine the value of LLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidde M Kroon
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Lotje A Hoogervorst
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nicole Hanna-Rivero
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Luke Traeger
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michelle L Thomas
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lokuhetty N, Larach JT, Rajkomar AKS, Mohan H, Waters PS, Heriot AG, Warrier SK. Robotic pelvic side-wall dissection and en-bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2185-2191. [PMID: 35555959 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global differences exist in managing lateral pelvic nodes in rectal cancer. Recent studies demonstrate improved local recurrence rates in patients undergoing lateral pelvic lymph node dissections (LPND) in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME) for advanced lower rectal cancer. This study aims to report on the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach in patients undergoing pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection or en-bloc sidewall resection for advanced lower rectal cancer. METHODS Patients who underwent an elective robotic pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection or en-bloc sidewall resection for locally advanced rectal cancer with suspicious lateral lymph nodes or pelvic side wall involvement between January 2018 and March 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, perioperative and histopathological variables were recorded and analysed. RESULTS Eight patients (3 males) with a mean age of 55 (33-73) years and mean body mass index of 26.3 (20.7-30.0) kg/m2 were included. The median operative time and blood loss were 458.75 (360-540) min and 143.75 (100-300) mL, respectively. There were no conversions or intra-operative complications. There were three post-operative complications recorded (two ileus and one anastomotic leak which required an endoscopic washout in theatre and intravenous antibiotics thereafter). Median length of stay was 12.75 (7-23) days. All patients had an R0 resection, and the median lateral pelvic lymph node yield was 9.1 (6-14). CONCLUSION This series demonstrates the practicality and the safety of the robotic approach in the introduction of this technique for en-bloc resection or LPND in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naradha Lokuhetty
- Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - José Tomás Larach
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Amrish K S Rajkomar
- General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Mohan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peadar S Waters
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,General Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Conradi LC, Rödel C, Ghadimi M. Rectal Cancer: Open Questions in 2022 Current Standards of Clinical Practice and Ongoing Trials. Digestion 2022; 103:175-182. [PMID: 35350020 DOI: 10.1159/000522006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer remains a complex disease and a relevant global health issue, increasingly affecting also younger patients. This update review summarizes the current standard of care and discusses the individualized treatment approaches taking into consideration individual tumor characteristics and patients preferences. SUMMARY Remaining "gray zones" of rectal cancer therapy warranting further prospective studies are identified including surgical approaches for rectal cancer, e.g., minimally invasive surgical techniques and lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancers. The emerging concept of a watch-and-wait strategy upon clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy is discussed, also considering the still limited evidence and the clinical challenges arising from individualized patient management. KEY MESSAGES Finally, currently conducted clinical trials of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group are described, aiming to further individualize multimodal treatment according to risk profiles and strict MRI criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena-Christin Conradi
- Clinic for General, Visceral and Pediatric surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Clinic for General, Visceral and Pediatric surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jutten E, Kruijff S, Francken AB, Lutke Holzik MF, van Leeuwen BL, van Westreenen HL, Wevers KP. Surgical treatment of anorectal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open 2021; 5:6446962. [PMID: 34958352 PMCID: PMC8675246 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The surgical approaches for anorectal melanoma can be categorized into local excision (procedures without lymph node removal and preservation of the rectum) and extensive resection (procedures with rectum and pararectal lymph node removal). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival of patients who underwent extensive resection with that of patients who underwent local excision, stratifying patients according to tumour stage. Methods A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching MEDLINE/PubMed for manuscripts published until March 2021. Studies comparing survival outcomes in patients with anorectal melanoma who underwent local excision versus extensive resection were screened for eligibility. Meta-analysis was performed for overall survival after the different surgical approaches, stratified by tumour stage. Results There were 347 studiesidentified of which 34 were included for meta-analysis with a total of 1858 patients. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the surgical approaches in patients per stage (stage I odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 2.72, P = 0.49); stage II odds ratio 1.61 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 4.18, P = 0.33); stage I–III odds ratio 1.19 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.70, P = 0.35). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the time intervals (<2000, 2001–2010 and 2011–2021) and for continent of study origin. Subgroup analysis for time interval and continent of origin also showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival. Conclusion No significant survival benefit exists for patients with anorectal melanoma treated with local excision or extensive resection, independent of tumour stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Jutten
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Zilvermeeuw 1, 7609 PP Almelo, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Brecht Francken
- Department of Surgery, Isala Zwolle, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn F Lutke Holzik
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Zilvermeeuw 1, 7609 PP Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Henderik L van Westreenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Isala Zwolle, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Kevin P Wevers
- Department of Surgery, Isala Zwolle, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang L, Hirano Y, Heng G, Ishii T, Kondo H, Hara K, Obara N, Asari M, Yamaguchi S. The Significance of Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Low Rectal Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1866-1874. [PMID: 33078319 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04825-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The indications for lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in rectal cancer have been controversial. The purpose of this study was to clarify the significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer. METHODS This was a retrospective study at a high-volume cancer center in Japan. In this study, 40 patients with pathologically positive LLN (LLN+) were matched with 175 negative (LLN-) patients by propensity score matching (PSM). COX regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors related to prognosis. The relapse-free survival rate (RFS) and overall survival rate (OS) of the 2 groups before and after matching were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 64 patients undergoing LLND, 40 (62.5%) patients had LLN+ disease. The LLN+ patients showed deeper infiltration of the primary tumor than the LLN- patients (T3-T4: 87.5% vs. 72.0%; p = 0.044), a greater number of metastatic lymph nodes (N2: 75.0% vs. 35.4%; p < 0.001), and a higher rate of local recurrence (30% vs. 9.1%; p < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more common in the 40 LLN+ patients than in the 175 LLN- patients (70.0% vs. 46.8%; p = 0.008). After relapse, the rate of first-line chemotherapy administration for LLN+ patients was higher than that for the LLN- patients (62.5% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.005). The RFS of LLN+ patients was shorter than that of the LLN- patients (p = 0.005). After PSM, although more LLN+ patients received adjuvant chemotherapy than the LLN- patients (70.0% vs. 40.0%; p = 0.007), the local recurrence rate remained higher (30% vs. 10%; p = 0.025). The differences between RFS (p = 0.655) and OS rates (p = 0.164) of the 2 patient groups were not significant. CONCLUSION Even after LLND, patients with LLN+ low rectal cancer still showed an elevated local recurrence rate. Controlling local recurrence by adjuvant chemotherapy alone is difficult, and the additional strategic treatments are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liming Wang
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
| | - Yasumitsu Hirano
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Gregory Heng
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toshimasa Ishii
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroka Kondo
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kiyoka Hara
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nao Obara
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Asari
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shigeki Yamaguchi
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gao Z, Gu J. Surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a narrative review. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1026. [PMID: 34277826 PMCID: PMC8267292 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-2298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective To summarize the recent literature on surgical treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Background LRRC is a heterogeneous disease that requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The treatment and prognosis depend on the site and type of recurrence. Radical resection remains the primary method for achieving long-term survival and improving symptom control. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy can reduce tumor volume and improve the R0 resection rate. Surgeons must clearly understand pelvic anatomy, develop a detailed preoperative plan, adopt a multidisciplinary approach for the surgical resection of the tumor as well as any invaded soft tissues, vessels, and bones, and ensure proper reconstruction. However, extended radical surgery often leads to a higher risk of postoperative complications and a low quality of life. Methods We searched English-language articles with keywords “locally recurrent rectal cancer”, “surgery” and “multidisciplinary team” in PubMed published between January 2000 to October 2020. Conclusions LRRC is a complex problem. Long-term survival is not impossible following multidisciplinary treatment in appropriately selected LRRC patients. The management of LRRC relies on a specialist team that determines the biological behavior of the tumor and evaluates treatment options through multidisciplinary discussions, thereby balancing the surgical costs and benefits, alleviating postoperative complications, and improving patients’ quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoya Gao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Gu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery III, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fahy MR, Kelly ME, Nugent T, Hannan E, Winter DC. Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for low rectal cancer: a META-analysis of recurrence rates. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:551-558. [PMID: 33242114 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03804-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locoregional recurrence (LR) remains a problem for patients with lower rectal cancer despite standardized surgery and improved neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) has been routine practice for some time in the Orient/East, but other regions have concerns about morbidity. As perioperative care and surgical approaches are refined, this has been revisited for selected patients. The question as to whether LPLND improves oncological outcomes was explored here. METHODS A systematic review of patients who underwent TME with or without LPLND from 2000 to 2020 was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of LR between the two groups. RESULTS Seven papers met the predefined search criteria in which 2000 patients underwent TME alone, while 1563 patients had TME and LPLND. The rate of LR was marginally higher with TME alone when compared with TME plus LPLND, but this result was not statistically significant (9.8 vs 9.4%, odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.41-1.38, *p = 0.35). In addition, four studies reported on distant recurrence rates, with TME and LPLND showing a slight reduction in overall rates (27.3 vs 29.9%, respectively, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.92, *p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The addition of LPLND to TME is not associated with a significantly lower risk of LR in patients who undergo surgery for lower rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Fahy
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - M E Kelly
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - T Nugent
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E Hannan
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D C Winter
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A, Kim NK. Outcome of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection with total mesorectal excision in treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2020; 169:1005-1015. [PMID: 33317903 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard treatment of mid- and low-lying rectal cancer. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection has been suggested as an approach to decrease recurrence and improve survival. Our meta-analysis presented here aimed to review the current outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection and total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. METHODS A systematic literature search querying electronic databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed articles that reported the outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection combined with total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. The main outcome measures were local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall and disease free-survival, and complications. RESULTS This systematic review included 29 studies of 10,646 patients. Of those patients, 39.4% underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The median operation time for the lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was significantly longer than total mesorectal excision alone (360 minutes versus 294.7 minutes, P = .02). Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was associated with higher odds of overall complications (odds ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.87, P < .001) and urinary dysfunction (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-3.67, P = .008) than total mesorectal excision alone. Both groups had similar rates of male sexual dysfunction (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-2.79, P = .08), anastomotic leakage (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.93, P = .59), local recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.25, P = .79), distant metastasis (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.2, P = .72), overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.056, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.13, P = .13), and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.07, P = .37). CONCLUSION Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was not associated with a significant reduction of recurrence rates or improvement in survival as compared with total mesorectal excision alone; however, LPLND was associated with longer operation time and increased complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameh Hany Emile
- Department of General surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt.
| | - Hossam Elfeki
- Department of General surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Mostafa Shalaby
- Department of General surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Ahmad Sakr
- Department of General surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Nam Kyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinical Relevance and Practical Approach for Challenging Rectal Cancer MRI Findings. CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-020-00359-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
27
|
Stoner RC, Korngold EK. Anatomy of Pelvic Lymph Nodal Stations and Their Role in Staging of Rectal Cancers. Semin Roentgenol 2020; 56:152-157. [PMID: 33858641 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Stoner
- Oregon Health and Science University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Elena K Korngold
- Oregon Health and Science University, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Portland, OR.
| |
Collapse
|