Modified Systemic Inflammation Score Is an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Outcome in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammation Score for Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The link between inflammation and cancer survival has been the subject of substantial research. The goal of this review is to summarize the evidence on the prognostic value of systemic inflammation score (SIS) in esophageal cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles published until 30^th June 2022. We pooled adjusted data on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using a random-effects meta-analysis model. The review was pre-registered on PROSPER (No. CRD42022340717).

RESULTS

Eight studies were included. All studies were conducted either in China or Japan. Six studies showed that patients with SIS of 1-2 had poor OS as compared to those with scores of 0 (HR:1.42 95% CI: 1.24, 1.62 I²=25%). SIS of 1 (HR:1.45 95% CI: 1.18, 1.78 I²=0%) and 2 (HR:1.94 95% CI: 1.49, 2.53 I²=0%) were also associated with poor OS. Two studies compared the SIS score of 2 vs 0-1. Meta-analysis indicated that poor OS was associated with SIS of 2 (HR:1.80 95% CI: 1.25, 2.58). Data from three studies showed that the SIS score did not predict DFS (HR:1.40 95% CI: 0.82, 2.39 I²=91%).

CONCLUSION

SIS can be a novel prognostic indicator for esophageal cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention. Higher SIS is associated with a poor OS, but it does not predict DFS. Future studies are needed to strengthen the current evidence.

Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review

This review assesses how publications interpret factors that influence the serum or plasma albumin (PA) level in prognostic indices, focusing on inflammation and nutrition. On PubMed, a search for "albumin AND prognosis" yielded 23,919 results. From these records, prognostic indices were retrieved, and their names were used as search strings on PubMed. Indices found in 10 or more original research articles were included. The same search strings, restricted to "Review" or "Systematic review", retrieved yielded on the indices. The data comprised the 10 latest original research articles and up to 10 of the latest reviews. Thirty indices had 294 original research articles (6 covering two indices) and 131 reviews, most of which were from recent years. A total of 106 articles related the PA level to inflammation, and 136 related the PA level to nutrition. For the reviews, the equivalent numbers were 54 and 65. In conclusion, more publications mention the PA level as a marker of nutrition rather than inflammation. This is in contrast to several general reviews on albumin and nutritional guidelines, which state that the PA level is a marker of inflammation but not nutrition. Hypoalbuminemia should prompt clinicians to focus on the inflammatory aspects in their patients.

Prognostic value of a modified systemic inflammation score in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) system, which is constructed based on the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and albumin (Alb), has not been applied to evaluate the prognosis of malignant breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The present study aimed to explore the relationship between the mSIS and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and pathological complete response (pCR).

METHODS

A total of 305 malignant breast tumor patients who underwent NAC were incorporated into this retrospective analysis. We determined OS and DFS using K-M survival curves and the log-rank test. The relationship between the mSIS and OS and DFS was evaluated by a Cox regression model. A nomogram was constructed based on Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients in the mSIS low-risk group had better 5- and 8-year OS rates than those in the mSIS high-risk group (59.8% vs. 77.0%; 50.1% vs. 67.7%; X² = 8.5, P = 0.0035, respectively). Patients in the mSIS (1 + 2 score) + pCR subgroup had the highest 5- and 8-year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (OS: 55.0% vs. 75.7% vs. 84.8, 42.8% vs. 65.7% vs. 79.8%, X² = 16.6, P = 0.00025; DFS: 38.8% vs. 54.7% vs. 76.3%, 33.3% vs. 42.3 vs. 72.1%, X2 = 12.4, P = 0.002, respectively). Based on the mSIS, clinical T stage and pCR results, the nomogram had better predictive ability than the clinical TNM stage, NLR and Alb.

CONCLUSIONS

mSIS is a promising prognostic tool for malignant breast tumor patients who underwent NAC, and the combination of mSIS and pCR is helpful in enhancing the ability to predict a pCR.

Can the systemic inflammation score be used to predict prognosis in gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Inflammatory markers are being increasingly used to predict the prognosis of cancer patients. We hereby conducted the first meta-analysis assessing the association between systemic inflammation score (SIS) and prognosis of gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention.

Methods

A literature search was carried out on PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase up to 3rd June 2022 for relevant studies. Adjusted data reported as hazard ratios (HR) was combined in a random-effects model.

Results

A total of seven studies with 5,338 patients could be included. All studies were from either China or Japan and published in the last four years. Meta-analysis showed that higher SIS scores (1 or 2) were significant predictors of poor overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer patients (HR: 1.25 95% CI: 1.05, 1.49, I²= 11%). Similarly, the meta-analysis demonstrated that an SIS score of 2 was associated with poor OS as compared to scores of 0/1 (HR: 2.53 95% CI: 1.30, 4.89, I²= 45%). Data on disease-free survival (DFS) was scarce to draw conclusions.

Conclusion

The SIS score can be a simple and useful tool to predict OS in gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery. Data on DFS is scarce and conflicting. Future studies should report using standard reference groups and provide data on DFS to enhance current evidence.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, identifier: CRD42022335548.