Comparison of Submucosal With Intramuscular or Intravenous Administration of Dexamethasone for Third Molar Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of perineural and systemic dexamethasone use in impacted third molar surgeries in terms of anesthesia duration and postoperative complaints: a controlled, randomized observational study

BACKGROUND

Surgical extraction of impacted third molars (ITM) often leads to postoperative discomfort including pain, swelling, and limited function. Steroids like dexamethasone (DXN) are commonly used in oral surgery to manage pain and inflammation. Various administration routes for DXN exist, including intravenous (IV), perineural (PN), and oral applications, each with its advantages. Previous studies have shown that adding DXN to local anesthetics can prolong anesthesia duration and reduce postoperative sequelae. However, comparative studies on IV and PN applications with inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) of DXN in ITM surgeries are limited.

METHODS

This controlled, randomized observational study involved patients undergoing Class II position B ITM extraction. Patients were divided into three groups. IANB (1.8 ml of articaine hydrochloride + 1 ml of saline) was performed 1 h after IV-DXN (4 mg/ml DXN) was administered to the IV group. DXN along with IANB (1.8 ml of articaine hydrochloride + 1 ml of 4 mg/ml DXN) was applied to the PN group. Only IANB (1.8 ml of articaine hydrochloride + 1 ml of saline) was applied to the control group. Anesthesia duration was assessed as primary outcomes. Anesthesia duration was evaluated using a vitalometer from the molars. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain and edema measured on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days after surgery. Pain was evaluated postoperatively by using a visual analog scale. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study included 45 patients with similar demographic characteristics across groups. IV application significantly prolonged anesthesia duration compared to the control group. (p = 0.049) Both IV and PN administration of DXN reduced postoperative edema at 3rd (p = 0.048) and 7th day (p = 0.01). Post-procedure pain reduction was significant in the IV group (p = 0.011). On the other hand, it was observed that the pain did not decrease in the PN group at 3rd and 7th days compared to the control and IV groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PN and IV DXN administration prolonged anesthesia duration and reduced postoperative edema in ITM surgeries. However, PN DXN administration was associated with increased postoperative pain compared to IV DXN and control groups. Further studies comparing different doses and administration routes of DXN are needed to determine optimal strategies for managing postoperative discomfort in ITM surgeries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was conducted at Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Dentistry with the permission of Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (#04-2022/101). Trial registration is also available at clinicaltrail.gov. (NCT06318013, 26/05/2024).

Does Betamethasone Injection Into the Pterygomandibular Space Affect the Postoperative Outcomes of Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Pain, swelling, and trismus are common outcomes following impacted lower third molar surgery.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space on the aforementioned sequelae of third molar surgery.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE

A split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 patients with symmetrical bilateral impacted lower third molars. The surgeries were performed at an outpatient clinic under local anesthesia.

PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

The predictor variable is the steroid treatment. The experimental group received a 1 mL (6 mg) betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space, while the control group received a normal saline.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S)

The primary outcome variable was postoperative pain assessed using a visual analog scale. The secondary outcome variables were the number of analgesic tablets consumed, facial swelling, and trismus.

COVARIATES

The age and sex of the patients, the direction of impaction, and the duration of surgery were recorded.

ANALYSES

Comparisons between the groups were carried out using an unpaired t test. An analysis of variance test was used to assess intragroup differences. The significance was considered at P ≤ .05.

RESULTS

Of the 265 patients initially screened for study enrollment, the final sample included 40 subjects, with a mean age of 28.3 years (±7.4), 28 (70%) were mal and 12 (30%) were female. There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning postoperative pain or the number of consumed analgesic tablets. However, the betamethasone group exhibited significantly reduced facial swelling and increased mouth opening. On the first postoperative day, the visual analog scale pain score did not significantly differ between the betamethasone group (6.0 ± 1.7) and the control group (6.8 ± 1.4), with a P value of 0.112. On the first postoperative day, facial swelling measured 4.2 ± 1.3 mm in the betamethasone group compared to 6.0 ± 0.9 mm in the control group (P < .001). Mouth opening in the betamethasone group was 30.8 ± 6.7 mm, while in the control group, it measured 21.9 ± 5.5 mm (P < .001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Local betamethasone has no effect on pain after third molar surgery, but facial swelling and trismus are significantly reduced.

Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although wisdom-tooth extraction is a routine intervention, the postoperative period remains marked by local inflammation classically manifesting as pain, edema and trismus. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the best operative techniques, particularly for the mucosal closure stage on impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.

METHODS

This parallel, randomized, non-blinded study compared pain following removal of impacted third molars, with and without sutures. Patients were electronically allocated 1:1 to extraction with versus without sutures. Patients ≥ 14 years' old scheduled for extraction of four impacted wisdom teeth under general anesthesia at three French hospitals were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included taking antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, coagulation disorders or immunosuppression, and planned orofacial surgical procedures or emergency pain/infection. The primary objective was pain evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale on Day 3. Secondary outcomes were edema, trismus, healing, complications, painkiller consumption and quality of life on Day 3 and 31.

RESULTS

Between June 2016 and November 2018, 100 patients were randomized. Finally, 44 patients in the Suture group and 50 patients in the Without Suture group were analyzed. Mean age was 16.5 years and 66.6% of patients were female. After adjustment on center, age and smoking, no statistical difference was seen between groups for pain on Day 3 (p = 0.904). No differences were seen for swelling, trismus, consumption of painkillers, healing, complications or quality of life. Smokers had a 3.65 times higher complications rate (p = 0.0244).

CONCLUSIONS

Sutureless removal of third molars is thus a reliable technique without negative consequence on outcomes, and allows shorter operating time. Smoking is a risk factor for postoperative complications. Trial registration www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT02583997), registered 22/10/2015.