Primary and Recurrent Repair of Incisional Hernia Based on Biomechanical Considerations to Avoid Mesh-Related Complications

The impact of simultaneous panniculectomy in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is often performed in patients with obesity. While panniculectomy improves cosmetic outcomes, it may increase complications, particularly wound-related adverse events. Despite its widespread use, the impact of concurrent panniculectomy on postoperative complications in VHR remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether concurrent panniculectomy increases postoperative complications in VHR.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies published up to April 2024 comparing surgical outcomes in patients undergoing VHR with and without concurrent panniculectomy. We assessed recurrence, seroma, hematoma, surgical site infections (SSI), wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, chronic wound, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, duration of surgery, and deep venous thromboembolism (DVT). Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous endpoints, respectively. We used RStudio for statistics and heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

RESULTS

We screened 890 studies, fully reviewed 40, and included 11 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials, comprising 23,354 patients. Of these, 2,972 (13%) patients underwent VHR with concurrent panniculectomy (VHR-PAN). The mean age ranged from 37 to 59 years, and 73% of the sample were women. The mean BMI varied from 29 to 45 kg/m2, and 75% of the patients underwent mesh repair. The mean defect area ranged from 36 to 389 cm2. Most repairs were performed using mesh (75%) in an underlay position (68%) and 24% underwent component separation. VHR-PAN was associated with a decrease in recurrence rates (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.89; p < 0.001; I2 = 1%) with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 36 months. Furthermore, subgroup analysis of recurrence in studies with a mean follow-up of at least one year also showed a reduction in recurrence (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.88; p < 0.001; I2 = 12%), with a follow-up ranging from 12 to 36 months. Moreover, concurrent panniculectomy was associated with increased SSI (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.51; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), SSO (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.77; p < 0.001; I2 = 11%), skin necrosis (RR 2.94; 95% CI 1.26 to 6.85; p = 0.012; I2 = 0%) and reoperation (RR 1.73; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.28; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), and longer LOS (MD 0.90 day; 95%CI 0.40 to 1.40; p < 0.001; I2 = 56%). There was no significant difference in ocurrence of DVT, enterocutaneous fistula, hematoma, seroma, or wound dehiscence, neither on operative time or readmission rates.

CONCLUSION

VHR-PAN is associated with lower recurrence rates. However, it increases the risk of wound morbidity and reoperation and prolongs hospital stay. Surgeons should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of performing VHR-PAN.

STUDY REGISTRATION

A review protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024542721).

Three-year follow-up of the grip concept: an open, prospective, observational registry study on biomechanically calculated abdominal wall repair for complex incisional hernias

PURPOSE

We studied the effectiveness of biomechanically calculated abdominal wall reconstructions for incisional hernias of varying complexity in an open, prospective observational registry trial.

METHODS

From July 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2020, four hospitals affiliated with the University of Heidelberg recruited 198 patients with complex incisional hernias. Hernias were repaired using biomechanically calculated reconstructions and materials classified on their gripping force towards cyclic load. This approach determines the required strength preoperatively based on the hernia size, using the Critical Resistance to Impacts related to Pressure. The surgeon is supported in reliably determining the Gained Resistance, which is based on the mesh-defect-area-ratio, as well as other mesh and suture factors, and the tissue stability. Tissue stability is defined as a maximum distension of 1.5 cm upon a Valsalva maneuver. In complex cases, a CT scan of the abdomen can be used to assess unstable tissue areas both at rest and during Valsalva's maneuver.

RESULTS

Larger and stronger gripping meshes were required for more complex cases to achieve a durable repair, especially for larger hernia sizes. To achieve durable repairs, the number of fixation points increased while the mesh-defect area ratio decreased. Performing these repairs required more operating room time. The complication rate remained low. Less than 1% of recurrences and low pain levels were observed after 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical stability, defined as the resistance to cyclic load, is crucial in preventing postoperative complications, including recurrences and chronic pain.

Construction and properties of the silk fibroin and polypropylene composite biological mesh for abdominal incisional hernia repair

Background: In this study, a new composite biological mesh named SFP was prepared by combining silk fibroin with polypropylene mesh. The mechanism and clinical application value of the SFP composite mesh were explored.

Methods: The fibrous membrane was prepared by electrospinning of silk fibroin. The silk fibrous membrane was adhered to the polypropylene mesh by fibrin hydrogel to make a new composite mesh. The characterizations were verified by structural analysis and in vitro cell experiments. A total of 40 Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups, and 20 rats in each group were implanted with the SFP mesh and pure polypropylene mesh, respectively. The rats were sacrificed in batches on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 90th days after surgery. The adhesion degree and adhesion area on the mesh surface were compared, and a histopathological examination was carried out.

Results:In vitro cell function experiments confirmed that the SFP mesh had good cell viability. The control group had different degrees of adhesion on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 90th days after surgery. However, there was almost no intraperitoneal adhesions on the 3rd and 7th days after surgery, and some rats only had mild adhesions on the 14th and 90th days after surgery in the SFP group. There were statistically significant differences in the postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion area and adhesion degree between the two groups (p < 0.05). Histopathological examination confirmed that the mesenchymal cells were well arranged and continuous, and there were more new capillaries and adipocyte proliferation under the mesenchymal cells in the SFP group.

Conclusion: The SFP mesh shows good biocompatibility and biofunction in vitro and in vivo. It can promote the growth of peritoneal mesenchymal cells. The formation of a new mesenchymal cell layer can effectively reduce the extent and scope of adhesion between the mesh and abdominal organs. The SFP mesh will have a good application prospect in the field of abdominal wall hernia repair.

Standardized suturing can prevent slackening or bursting suture lines in midline abdominal incisions and defects

Purpose

Incisional hernias often follow open abdominal surgery. A small-stitch–small-bite suture might close the incision durably. We analyzed specific details of this closure technique and assessed their influence on the closure stability.

Methods

The effects of cyclic loads, simulating coughs were investigated on a bench test. We prepared porcine bellies in the median line and bovine flanks parallel to the muscle fibers with 15 cm long incisions. Then we punched round or rhomboid defects with a diameter of 5–10 cm into the center of the incision. Monomax® 2–0 and Maxon® 1 and 2–0 were used as suture materials. We tested the durability of the closure with pressure impacts of 210 mmHg repeated 425 times. Throughout the experiments, we modified the suturing technique, the surgeon, the tissue tension, the defect size and shape and the suture diameter.

Results

Standardizing the suture technique improved the durability of the closure significantly. Any other variations showed minor influences after standardization. All incisions with round defects up to 7.5 cm width withstood 425 impacts using standardized suturing. Unstandardized sutures failed in all cases. When closing an incision with a 10 cm wide defect, the tissues ruptured frequently next to the suture line. We defined criteria to standardize this suturing technique. For the first time, we developed a suture factor related to the durability of a sutured tissue closure. We integrated the suture factor into the concept of biomechanically durable repairs.

Conclusions

Suturing the abdominal wall with a standardized suturing technique improves its durability significantly.

Comparison of outcomes of ventral hernia repair using different meshes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate potential differences in patient outcomes when different meshes, especially biological meshes, were used for ventral hernia repair.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials.gov databases were searched for studies comparing biological meshes with biological or synthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. The outcomes were hernia recurrence rate, surgical site infection, and seroma. We performed a two-step network meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of several biological meshes: non-cross-linked human acellular dermal matrix (NCHADM), non-cross-linked porcine ADM (NCPADM), non-cross-linked bovine ADM (NCBADM), cross-linked porcine ADM (CPADM), and porcine small intestinal submucosa (PSIS).

RESULTS

From 6304 publications, 23 studies involving 2603 patients were finally included. We found no differences between meshes in recurrence at 1-year follow-up and in surgical site infection rate. NCBADM was associated with the lowest recurrence rate and the lowest surgical site infection rate. NCHADM implantation was associated with the lowest rate of seroma. PSIS was associated with a higher risk of seroma than NCHADM (pooled risk ratio 3.89, 95% confidence interval 1.13-13.39) and NCPADM (RR 3.42, 95% CI 1.29-9.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Our network meta-analysis found no differences in recurrence rate or surgical site infection among different biological meshes. The incidence of postoperative seroma was higher with PSIS than with acellular dermal matrices. We observed large heterogeneity in the studies of ventral hernia repair using biological meshes, and, therefore, well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed.