1
|
Deng S, Guo D, Liu L, Wang Y, Fei K, Zhang H. Preference for diagnosing and treating renal colic during pregnancy: a survey among Chinese urologists. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2914. [PMID: 38316888 PMCID: PMC10844619 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53608-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
To explore the preference for diagnosing and treating renal colic during pregnancy among Chinese urologists. A questionnaire was designed using the Sojump® platform. WeChat, the largest social networking platform in China, was used to distribute the questionnaire to urologists at hospitals of all levels in China. In total, 110 responses were included. Of the respondents, 100.0% used ultrasound to diagnose renal colic during pregnancy, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (17.3%) and low-dose CT (3.6%). Phloroglucinol (80.9%) and progesterone (72.7%) were the most commonly used antispasmodics and analgesics. Opioid analgesics were not commonly used (12.7%). Most of the respondents (63.6%) indicated that no more than 20% of the patients needed surgical intervention. If surgery was unavoidable, 95.5% preferred temporary renal drainage, including ureteral stenting (92.7%) and percutaneous nephrostomy (2.7%). However, some respondents still preferred definitive stone treatment, such as ureteroscopy lithotripsy (3.6%) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (0.9%). Moreover, there were no differences in the choices of urologists with different professional titles regarding diagnostic tools, most therapeutic medications, or surgical methods (p > 0.05). Ultrasound is the preferred tool for diagnosing renal colic during pregnancy. Low-dose CT is still not widely accepted. Pregnant patients with renal colic are initially treated conservatively. Urologists prefer ureteral stenting when there are clinical indications for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shidong Deng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China
| | - Dayong Guo
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China
| | - Lingzhi Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China
| | - Yurou Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China
| | - Kuilin Fei
- Department of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| | - Huihui Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
- Institute of Hospital Administration, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lyon M, Sun A, Shah A, Llarena N, Dempster C, Sivalingam S, Calle J, Gadani S, Zampini A, De S. Comparison of Radiation Exposure for Pregnant Patients Requiring Intervention for Suspected Obstructing Nephrolithiasis. Urology 2023; 182:61-66. [PMID: 37783398 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the differences in radiation exposure per suspected stone episode between percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCN), stent, and primary ureteroscopy (URS).The incidence of nephrolithiasis in pregnancy is low; however, repercussions for both mother and fetus can be significant. In cases of suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis, intervention may be required, including ureteral stent, PCN, or URS, with the potential for multiple subsequent procedures that often utilize fluoroscopy. METHODS Pregnant patients who required an intervention (stent, PCN, or URS) for suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was total fluoroscopy exposure per suspected stone episode. Secondary outcomes included fluoroscopic exposure per procedure and number of procedures required. RESULTS After excluding patients with renal anomalies and incomplete radiation data, 78 out of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Forty patients (51.3%) underwent initial stent placement, 22 (28.2%) underwent initial PCN placement, and 16 (20.5%) underwent primary URS. Total mean radiation exposure per stone episode was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCN, (286.9 mGy vs 3.7 mGy (stent) and 0.2 mGy (URS), P <.001). In addition, patients who underwent initial PCN placement had significantly more procedures (P <.001) and mean radiation exposure per procedure was higher (P <.001). More than 40% of PCNs experienced dysfunction, and mean duration between PCN exchanges was 16.5 days. CONCLUSION In pregnant patients with suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis requiring intervention, initial PCN placement was associated with a significantly higher number of procedures, radiation exposure per procedure, and total radiation exposure per suspected stone episode compared to stent and URS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison Lyon
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Alec Sun
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anup Shah
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Natalia Llarena
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Cleveland, OH
| | - Carrie Dempster
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sri Sivalingam
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Juan Calle
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sameer Gadani
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anna Zampini
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Smita De
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dean NS, Krambeck AE. Contemporary Use of Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging in Suspected Urolithiasis in Pregnancy. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:443-449. [PMID: 37314612 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01171-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We aimed to examine the role of low-dose CT (LDCT) in the diagnostic work-up for suspected urolithiasis in pregnancy. We reviewed contemporary urologic recommendations for CT in pregnancy, its utilization for suspected urolithiasis, and explored barriers to its use. RECENT FINDINGS National urologic guidelines and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend the judicious use of LDCT imaging in pregnancy when necessary. We noted inconsistencies in review article management pathways and recommendations for CT imaging for suspected urolithiasis in pregnancy. Overall CT utilization in pregnancy for suspected urolithiasis is low. Proposed barriers to LDCT use in pregnancy include fears of litigation and misperceptions of the harm of diagnostic radiation. Recent advancements in imaging technologies for urolithiasis in pregnancy are limited. More specific diagnostic pathway recommendations from national urologic guideline bodies for when to use LDCT to investigate renal colic in pregnancy may reduce diagnostic and intervention delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas S Dean
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 2300, Chicago, IL, 60611, United States.
| | - Amy E Krambeck
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 2300, Chicago, IL, 60611, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang W, Xie Z, Liu M, Zhao Z, Wu T. Analysis of uroseptic shock after ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi during pregnancy: a case report. BMC Urol 2023; 23:128. [PMID: 37501116 PMCID: PMC10375750 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01299-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uroseptic shock secondary to ureteral calculi during pregnancy is rare. It is characterized by rapid onset, rapid progression, aggressive disease, limited treatment, poor prognosis, and a mortality rate higher than 20% with improper or delayed management. A clear diagnosis is made based on typical clinical symptoms and abdominal ultrasound, often requiring combined multidisciplinary treatment and the simultaneous release of the obstruction. The high mortality rate is mainly related to inappropriate early treatment of stones and infections or failure to intervene in a timely manner. CASE PRESENTATION A 21-year-old first-time pregnant patient with uroseptic shock was admitted to our intensive care unit. The patient was successfully treated at our hospital with multidisciplinary cooperation, high-dose vasoactive drugs, IABP, CRRT, VA-ECMO, and termination of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Timely relief of obstructions, termination of pregnancy, and the provision of IABP, CRRT, and VA-ECMO when necessary in critically ill patients with uroseptic shock during pregnancy can improve the success rate of resuscitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Tang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 149 Road Dalian, Huichuan District, Zunyi, China
| | - Zhifei Xie
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 149 Road Dalian, Huichuan District, Zunyi, China
| | - Mingwen Liu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 149 Road Dalian, Huichuan District, Zunyi, China
| | - ZeJu Zhao
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 149 Road Dalian, Huichuan District, Zunyi, China.
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 149 Road Dalian, Huichuan District, Zunyi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alajmani LB, Rafi B, Banjar R, Alsenani F, Hassan F, Qashgry A. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy of ureteric stone using thulium fiber laser in a pregnant patient, case report. Urol Case Rep 2023; 49:102437. [PMID: 37398947 PMCID: PMC10310900 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Nephrolithiasis represents a common cause of non-obstetrical abdominal pain during pregnancy with 1 out of 200 pregnancies being affected. 20%-30% of patients require ureteroscopy. Many studies were done on safety of holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) during pregnancy but none on Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL). To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of pregnant patient with nephrolithiasis that was treated using ureteroscopy and TFL. We present a 28 years old pregnant woman that presented to our hospital with a left distal ureteric stone. Patient underwent URS and lithotripsy using TFL. The procedure was tolerated with no complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lujin B. Alajmani
- Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Saudi Arabia
| | - Badr Rafi
- Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rowaa Banjar
- Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal Alsenani
- Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fadil Hassan
- Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Qashgry
- Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zou B, Zhou Y, He Z, Zhou X, Dong S, Zheng X, Xu R, Duan X, Zeng G. A critical appraisal of urolithiasis clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. Transl Androl Urol 2023; 12:977-988. [PMID: 37426603 PMCID: PMC10323444 DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument was developed to improve the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). High-quality guidelines can provide reliable recommendations for different clinical issues. Currently, there is no quality appraisal of CPGs for urolithiasis. This study evaluated the quality of evidence-based CPGs for urolithiasis and provided new insights into improving guideline quality on urolithiasis. Methods Systematic reviews were conducted to identify urolithiasis CPGs in PubMed, electronic databases, and websites of medical associations from January 2009 to July 2022. The quality of included CPGs was evaluated by four reviewers using the AGREE II instrument. Subsequently, the scores of all domains in the AGREE II instrument were calculated. Results A total of 19 urolithiasis CPGs were identified for review: seven from Europe, six from USA, three from international union, two from Canada, and one from Asia. The agreement among reviewers was rated good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 0.806; 95% CI: 0.779-0.831]. The domains with the highest scores were scope and purpose (69.7%, 54.2-86.1%) and clarity of presentation (76.8%, 59.7-90.3%). The domains of stakeholder involvement (44.9%, 19.4-84.7%) and applicability (48.5%, 30.2-72.9%) gained the lowest score. Only five guidelines (26.3%) were considered "strongly recommended". Conclusions The overall quality of the eligible CPGs was relatively high; however, future work is still needed in the domains of rigor of development, editorial independence, applicability, and stakeholder involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bangyu Zou
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuhao Zhou
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiqing He
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zhou
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sicheng Dong
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaopeng Zheng
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ran Xu
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaolu Duan
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|