Surgical Effectiveness of Uniportal-VATS Lobectomy Compared to Open Surgery in Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Uniportal thoracoscopic mediastinal lymphadenectomy using appropriate surgical steps

Background

Although lymphadenectomies play an important role in the surgical treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the quality of lymphadenectomies via a uniportal approach has only been evaluated in a few studies. We describe the surgical steps for a mediastinal lymphadenectomy via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) and compare the quality of mediastinal lymphadenectomies using uVATS versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (mVATS).

Methods

Between April 2017 and January 2023, we analyzed data from 304 patients with NSCLC who underwent (bi-)lobectomy with nodal dissection (ND)2a-1 or greater lymphadenectomy via uVATS or mVATS. We compared patient characteristics and perioperative results, including the number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), between the two approaches. In addition, the factors associated with N-upstage were identified.

Results

No significant differences in the total number of harvested LNs were detected between the two approaches. Significantly more LN#2R/4R zone LNs were harvested in the uVATS group compared with the number harvested in the mVATS group [uVATS group: 8.5, interquartile range (IQR), 5-12.3; mVATS group: 7, IQR, 5-9, P=0.0177], while no significant differences in total nodes or nodes harvested in other zones were detected. Multivariable analysis revealed that pathologic invasion size [odds ratio: 1.0200, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0100-1.0400, P=0.0050], but not approach (uVATS, odds ratio: 0.6240, 95% CI: 0.3160-1.2300, P=0.1750), significantly contributed to N factor upstages.

Conclusions

The use of appropriate surgical steps enabled us to achieve similar quality lymphadenectomies via mVATS or uVATS.

Are the Efficacy and Safety of Chest Tubes in Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Related to the Level of Intercostal Space Insertion or to the Drain Type? A Prospective Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate if the efficacy and safety of chest tube placement are influenced by the level of intercostal space insertion (uniportal VATS vs. biportal VATS) or by the type of drain employed (standard vs. smart coaxial drain).

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent either uniportal or biportal VATS upper lobectomies with lymphadenectomy were prospectively collected in three European centers. The uniportal VATS group with a 28 Fr standard chest tube (U-VATS standard) was compared with the uniportal VATS group with a 28 Fr smart drain (U-VATS smart), and U-VATS smart was also compared with biportal VATS with a 28 Fr smart drain inserted in the VIII intercostal space (Bi-VATS smart).

RESULTS

When comparing the U-VATS standard group with the U-VATS smart, a higher fluid output was recorded in the U-VATS smart (p: 0.004) in the III post-operative day (p.o.) and overall (p: 0.027), with a lower 90-day re-admission in the U-VATS smart (p: 0.04). The Bi-VATS smart group compared to U-VATS smart showed a higher fluid output in the I p.o. (p < 0.001), with no difference in total fluid amount or hospitalization. The Bi-VATS smart recorded a lower incidence (p < 0.001) of residual pleural space or effusion (p: 0.004) at chest X-rays prior to drain removal but a higher level of pain and chronic intercostal neuralgia (p: 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Chest tube insertion through the same incision space in uniportal VATS seems to be safe and effective. Smart drains can improve the fluid output in uniportal VATS, as if the drainage were inserted in a lower space (i.e., biportal VATS), but with less discomfort.

Radicality and safety of mediastinal lymphadenectomy in lung resection: a comparative analysis of uniportal thoracoscopic, multiportal thoracoscopic, and thoracotomy approaches

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer poses a significant challenge with high mortality rates. Minimally invasive surgical approaches, including the uniportal thoracoscopic technique, offer potential benefits in terms of recovery and patient compliance. This study focuses on evaluating the radicality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy during uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection, specifically assessing the reachability of established lymphatic stations.

METHODS

A comparative study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava from January 2015 to July 2022, focusing on the evaluation of radicality in mediastinal lymphadenectomy across three patient subgroups: uniportal thoracoscopic approach, multiportal thoracoscopic approach, and thoracotomy approach. The study implemented the routine identification and excision of 8 lymph node stations from the respective hemithorax to assess the radicality of lymph node harvesting.

RESULTS

A total of 428 patients were enrolled and evaluated. No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph nodes removed between the subgroups. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 6.50 in the left hemithorax and 6.49 in the right hemithorax. The 30-day postoperative morbidity rate for the entire patient population was 27.3%, with 17.5% experiencing minor complications and 6.5% experiencing major complications. Statistically significant differences were observed in major complications between the uniportal approach and the thoracotomy approach (3.5% vs 12.0%, p = 0.002). The overall mortality rate in the study population was 3%, with a statistically significant difference in mortality between the uniportal and multiportal approaches (1.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

The uniportal approach demonstrated comparable accessibility and lymph node yield to multiportal and thoracotomy techniques. It is equivalent to established methods in terms of postoperative complications, with fewer major complications compared to thoracotomy. While our study indicates a potential for lower mortality following uniportal lung resection in comparison to multiportal lung resection, and demonstrates comparable outcomes to thoracotomy, it is important to approach these findings cautiously and refrain from drawing definitive conclusions.

Modified pericostal suture technique to reduce postoperative pain and provide optimum anatomic restoration after conversion of minimally invasive thoracic surgery to thoracotomy

Minimally invasive thoracic techniques often need to be converted to open thoracotomy. Thoracotomy is associated with severe postoperative pain in 50% of the patients, and this situation can be maintained for a prolonged period. Many efforts have been made to avoid this complication. We propose an easy and fast thoracotomy closure technique to avoid nerve entrapment at the time of chest closure suitable for cases of conversion to thoracotomy after a minimally invasive attempt. The proposed method effectively avoids interference with the intercostal nerve, which remains intact and restores the anatomy of the intercostal space. Efforts to decrease postoperative pain are vital. Thoracic surgeons are the principal health professionals able to deal with operative factors and postoperative pain management. We believe that the use of this easy and fast technique can facilitate excellent anatomic repositioning of the ribs alongside nerve sparing.

Uniportal VATS for Diagnosis and Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Uniportal VATS has become an accepted approach in minimally invasive thoracic surgery since its first report for lobectomy in 2011. Since the initial restrictions in indications, it has been used in almost all procedures, from conventional lobectomies to sublobar resections, bronchial and vascular sleeve procedures and even tracheal and carinal resections. In addition to its use for treatment, it provides an excellent approach for suspicious solitary undiagnosed nodules after bronchoscopic or transthoracic image-guided biopsy. Uniportal VATS is also used as a surgical staging method in NSCLC due to its low invasiveness in terms of chest tube duration, hospital stay and postoperative pain. In this article, we review the evidence of uniportal VATS accuracy for NSCLC diagnosis and staging and provide technical details and recommendations for its safe performance for that purpose.

Risk Factors Associated with Post-Operative Complications in Multidisciplinary Treatment of Descending Necrotizing Mediastinitis

BACKGROUND

Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a severe, life-threatening complication of oropharyngeal infections with cervical necrotizing fasciitis. In this study, we aimed to identify any possible factors that correlate with favorable outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our series of 18 patients who underwent surgical treatment for DNM from a cervical abscess. Gender, age, symptoms, etiopathogenesis, comorbidities, time to surgery from diagnosis, degree of diffusion, identified microorganisms, surgical procedure, days in the intensive care unit, need for tracheostomy, complications, and surgical outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

The main type of surgery was thoracotomy + cervicotomy in eight cases (50.0%), followed by cervicotomy +VATS in four (22.2%). Seven patients (38.9%) had two or more surgeries; a bilateral operation was necessary for four patients. Evaluating the risk factors associated with post-operative complications, age ≥ 60 years (p:0.031), cervicotomy alone as surgical approach (p = 0.040), and the bilateral approach (p = 0.048) resulted in significance in terms of the univariate analysis; age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.04) and cervical approach (p = 0.05) maintained their significance in terms of the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The low mortality of our series emphasizes the importance of an extensive and immediate surgical drainage of both the neck and the mediastinum. Mediastinal drainage from cervicotomy seems to be a risk factor for post-operative complications. Minimally invasive surgery on the chest cavity, such as with Uniportal-VATS, could be a good approach above all in elderly patients and all those cases where bilateral access is required.