Comparison of Application Effects of Different Hemostasis Methods After Ischemic Cerebrovascular Intervention

Advancements in Vascular Closure Devices for Effective Hemostasis in Femoral Artery Interventions

With medical technology development, endovascular intervention has been widely used in clinical practice, and the establishment of surgical access through the femoral artery, where most vascular interventions are performed, is a common method. Postoperative hemostasis at the femoral artery puncture site is a key part of interventional procedures and is particularly important to ensure the safety and effectiveness of hemostasis. Some patients undergoing interventional therapy also use anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs preoperatively and undergo systemic heparin session intraoperatively, which leads to abnormal coagulation, thus increasing the difficulty of hemostasis at the puncture point postoperatively. Certain patients with specific conditions, such as combined vascular calcification, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and renal impairment, present more challenging cases for postoperative puncture point hemostasis. Femoral artery puncture site hemostasis methods include manual compression, arterial compression devices, and vascular closure devices, which are a kind of equipment that helps interventional doctors stop bleeding quickly at the femoral artery puncture site. From the 1990s to the present, vascular occluders with many different concepts and mechanisms have emerged. Based on different hemostatic principles and materials, the mechanisms and principles of action are varied and include sealant occlusion, collagen patch embolization, polyester suture closure, absorbable polyethanol embolic agents, nickel-titanium alloy clips, polydiethanol sealant embolization, and suture bioabsorbable patches. Many studies have compared the hemostatic effect of vascular closure devices with those of manual compression. In this article, we review the hemostatic effects of the 2 modalities and the advances in the use of vascular closure devices in vascular intervention.

Application and the Effect of the Triple Prerehabilitation Nursing Model in the Perioperative Period of Knee Arthroplasty in Diabetic Patients

Objective

The aim of the study was to explore the application and the effect of the triple prerehabilitation nursing model in the perioperative period of knee arthroplasty in diabetic patients.

Methods

The prospectively included 60 patients with diabetes who underwent total knee replacement were admitted from August 2021 to April 2022 and were divided into 2 groups according to the (1 : 1) ratio. The control group was mainly given routine nursing care. On the basis of the control group, the observation group received triple prerehabilitation nursing. The postoperative knee flexion, hospital for the special surgery knee score (HSS), the daily living ability (Barthel) score, the modified fall efficacy scale (MFES) score, the recovery of the lower-limb muscle strength, and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The knee flexion degree and lower-limb muscle recovery of the observation group were better than those of the control group at 3 d, 7 d, and 14 d after operation (P < 0.05). The HSS score, Barthel score, and MFES score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The triple prerehabilitation nursing care for diabetic patients undergoing total knee replacement can promote the recovery of limb function.