Comparison of Long-Term Survival Between cT1N0 Stage Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Endoscopic Dissection and Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Treatment of Early-Stage Cancer or Precancerous Lesion in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

(1) Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely accepted as the standard method for treating early-stage cancer or precancerous lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract; however, it may be difficult in patients with liver cirrhosis due to clinical challenges such as coagulation dysfunction, presence of gastroesophageal varices, etc. We aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of ESD in these populations. (2) Methods: The clinical data of patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Inclusion criteria of the study were: a. patients with liver cirrhosis; b. patients who underwent ESD; c. patients who were diagnosed with early-stage cancer or precancerous lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. (3) Results: Eight patients were enrolled from April 2019 to April 2023, of whom three were male and five were female, with ages ranging from 43 to 70 years old. Seven lesions were located in the stomach and one other lesion was in the esophagus. ESD was performed successfully in all eight patients, and the resected lesion size ranged from 2 to 6 cm. Only one patient encountered postoperative complications, namely, chest pain and fever. No recurrence was noticed during a follow-up of 3 to 45 months. (4) Conclusions: ESD may serve as a safe and effective method for treating upper gastrointestinal early-stage cancer or precancerous lesions in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Efficacy of endoscopic therapy for T1b esophageal cancer and construction of prognosis prediction model: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of endoscopic therapy on the long-term survival outcomes of T1b oesophageal cancer (EC) is unclear, this study was designed to clarify the survival outcomes of endoscopic therapy and to construct a model for predicting the prognosis in T1b EC patients.

METHODS

This study was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2017 of patients with T1bN0M0 EC. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between endoscopic therapy group, esophagectomy group and chemoradiotherapy group, respectively. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting was used as the main analysis method. The propensity score matching method and an independent dataset from our hospital were used as sensitivity analysis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (Lasso) was employed to sift variables. A prognostic model was then established and was verified in two external validation cohorts.

RESULTS

The unadjusted 5-year CSS was 69.5% (95% CI, 61.5-77.5) for endoscopic therapy, 75.0% (95% CI, 71.5-78.5) for esophagectomy and 42.4% (95% CI, 31.0-53.8) for chemoradiotherapy. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting adjustment, CSS and OS were similar in endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy groups ( P =0.32, P =0.83), while the CSS and OS of chemoradiotherapy patients were inferior to endoscopic therapy patients ( P <0.01, P <0.01). Age, histology, grade, tumour size, and treatment were selected to build the prediction model. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics of 1, 3, and 5 years in the validation cohort 1 were 0.631, 0.618, 0.638, and 0.733, 0.683, 0.768 in the validation cohort 2. The calibration plots also demonstrated the consistency of predicted and actual values in the two external validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic therapy achieved comparable long-term survival outcomes to esophagectomy for T1b EC patients. The prediction model developed performed well in calculating the OS of patients with T1b EC.