Analysis of neuroendoscopy for the treatment of macroadenomas and giant pituitary adenomas

Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of acromegalic patients with giant growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: a single-center study of 67 cases

PURPOSE

Acromegalic patients with giant growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas (GHPAs) (≥ 40 mm) are relatively rare, and their clinical characteristics and treatment outcome data are limited. This study aims to analyze the clinical practice experience of giant GHPAs.

METHODS

Sixty-seven acromegalic patients with giant GHPAs and 67 patients with macro GHPAs (10-39 mm), matched for age and gender from the same hospital during the same period, were retrospectively recruited. The clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Enlargement of the extremities and facial features were the most common symptoms in most patients (92.5%). Compared with the macroadenoma group, more frequent visual impairment (86.6% vs. 25.4%, P < 0.001) and gonadal axis dysfunction (49.3% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.008), higher preoperative fasting GH, nadir GH after OGTT and IGF-1 levels, and a higher proportion of extrasellar tumor invasion were seen in the giant adenoma group. As the adenoma size increases, the total resection rate decreases, and postoperative complications and multimodal treatment strategies increase significantly. Fasting and nadir GH levels remained higher at 1 week postoperatively, and there were more surgical complications and cases of anterior hypopituitarism in the giant group. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 12 patients (36.4%) in the giant GHPA group and 17 (36.2%) in the macro GHPA group achieved biochemical remission. Other factors such as age of onset, age of diagnosis, delayed diagnosis time, metabolic complications, p53 positive rate, and Ki-67 index showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With aggressive multimodal therapy, the biochemical remission rate of acromegalic patients with giant GHPAs is comparable to that of patients with macro adenoma. However, postoperative complications and hypopituitarism need to be closely monitored.

Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and residual tumors in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: risk analysis and nomogram development

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is the primary method used to treat pituitary adenomas (PAs) at present; however, this technique is associated with certain risks, including cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CFL) and residual tumors (RTs). In this study, we aimed to identify specific risk factors for intraoperative CFL (ioCFL) and postoperative RT in patients with pituitary adenoma and construct a corresponding nomogram for risk assessment.

METHODS

We collected a range of information from 782 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal PA resection in the Department of Neurosurgery at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between 2019 and 2021. Patients were then randomly assigned to training and validation groups (in a 8:2 ratio) with R software. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were then used to screen variables related to ioCFL and RT. These variables were then used to construct a predictive nomogram. Finally, the accuracy of the nomogram was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models identified four risk factors for ioCFL (Hardy grade, tumor size, position, and consistency) and five risk factors for RT (operation time, tumor size, consistency, Knosp grade, and primary/recurrence type). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the ioCFL risk model was 0.666 and 0.697 for the training and validation groups, respectively. For RT, the AUCs for the two groups were 0.788 and 0.754, respectively. The calibration plots for the ioCFL and RT models showed high calibration quality and DCA analysis yielded excellent efficiency with regards to clinical decision making.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size, growth characteristics, and invasion location were identified as the main factors affecting intraoperative CFL and RT. With our novel nomogram, surgeons can identify high-risk patients according to preoperative and intraoperative tumor performance and reduce the probability of complications.

"In situ bone flap" combined with vascular pedicled mucous flap to reconstruction of skull base defect

BACKGROUND

At present, neuroendoscopy technology has made rapid development, and great progress has been made in the operation of lesions in the saddle area of the skull base. However, the complications of cerebrospinal fluid and intracranial infection after the operation are still important and life-threatening complications, which may lead to poor prognosis.

AIM

To investigate the method of in situ bone flap combined with nasal septum mucosal flap for reconstruction of enlarged skull base defect by endonasal sphenoidal approach and to discuss its application effect.

METHODS

Clinical data of 24 patients undergoing transnasal sphenoidal endoscopic approach in the Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated 2 Hospital of Nantong University from January 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent multi-layer reconstruction of skull base using in situ bone flap combined with nasal septum mucosa flap. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection were analyzed, and the application effect and technical key points of in situ bone flap combined with nasal septum mucosa flap for skull base bone reconstruction were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 5 cases of high flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and 7 cases of low flow CSF leakage. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 2 patients (8.3%) and intracranial infection in 2 patients (8.3%), which were cured after strict bed rest, continuous drainage of lumbar cistern combined with antibiotic treatment, and no secondary surgical repair was required. The patients were followed up for 8 to 36 months after the operation, and no delayed cerebrospinal fluid leakage or intracranial infection occurred during the follow-up. Computed tomography reconstruction of skull base showed satisfactory reconstruction after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The use of in situ bone flap combined with vascular pedicled mucous flap to reconstruction of skull base defect after endonasal sphenoidal approach under neuroendoscopy has a lower incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage and lower complications, which has certain advantages and is worthy of clinical promotion.