Reconstruction of facial defects using a pre-expanded scalp flap: A description of the method used and outcomes of 43 patients

[Forehead burns]

Severe burns on the forehead are rare; well-conducted initial surgical treatment also limits the occurrence of sequelae. Therefore, indications for repairing the forehead arise from complex burns often extending to adjacent units. Repair techniques depend on the location and size of the lesions, associated nearby damage, and the patient's ability to withstand the burden of treatment. Management at the acute stage determines the sequelae; excision-grafting is the standard treatment, but it yields good results only if the fundamental principles of repair are respected: intervention within the 10th and 15th days post-burn, graft harvesting from the cephalic extremity or the upper part of the thorax and arms, and respect for the frontal unit. Sequelae management follows the same imperatives and typically requires skin expansion: front expansion for skin flaps if enough frontal skin is still available, upper thorax expansion for full thickness skin grafts if the frontal scar is too extensive. However, the excellent results obtained should not conceal the significant constraints associated with skin expansion.

Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study

Reconstruction of scalp defects is a complicated and challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons. This retrospective observational study assessed the effectiveness of using platelet-rich gel (PRG) versus the external tissue expansion technique (TET) in reconstructing scalp defects. The clinical data of 24 patients with scalp defects treated with PRG or external TET were collected from September 2018 to March 2022. Data on the wound characteristics, wound healing time, cost of treatment, visual analog scale, and observed wound healing status were collected. The mean wound healing times in the PRG and TET groups were 25.00 ± 5.77 and 13.58 ± 9.68 days, respectively (P < .05). The PRG group was significantly more cost-effective than the TET group (P < .05). TET treatment significantly increased patients' postoperative pain, which decreased over time (P < .05), while PRG treatment caused no significant change in pain (P > .05). The 2 groups showed no tissue depression or color change after wound healing at follow-up, but the hair growth in the TET group was significantly better than that in the PRG group (P < .05). Compared with TET treatment of scalp defects, PRG is not only simple and painless but also has a low treatment cost and, more importantly, does not involve the risk of surgery and anesthesia. However, using TET to treat scalp defects requires the careful selection of appropriate cases.

Reconstruction of Hemifacial Congenital Giant Nevus with Pre-expanded Scalp Flaps and Deltopectoral Skin Flaps

BACKGROUND

The hemifacial congenital giant nevus impacts both physical and mental health of the patients. Excision is typically the most suitable option in these situations, but reconstructing the subsequent surgical defects is always a serious challenge.

METHODS

Between February 2012 and January 2021, a retrospective review of 4 patients who suffered from hemifacial congenital giant nevus was conducted, and they were treated by pre-expanded scalp flap and deltopectoral flap simultaneously. All patients receive tissue expansion, nevus resection, expanded skin flap transfer, and pedicle division.

RESULTS

Four patients with hemifacial congenital giant nevi were successfully treated with no major complications. One patient with a transferred deltopectoral flap experienced distal necrosis of the flap, and healed after dressing changes. No recurrence of the nevus was found during the follow-up period, and the transferred skin flaps match well with facial skin in contour and color.

CONCLUSION

This modified pre-expanded scalp flap combined with a deltopectoral flap provides an easy and reliable way for hemifacial reconstruction in patients with a congenital giant nevus.