Exoscope and operative microscope for training in microneurosurgery: A laboratory investigation on a model of cranial approach

Posterior Cranial Fossa Surgery with a 3 Dimensional Exoscope: A Single-Center Survey-Based Analysis and a Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

The potential advantages of exoscopy have been discussed theoretically for a long time. Such a concept holds significance, especially in the specific setting of the posterior cranial fossa (PCF), characterized by complex anatomy and long and narrow surgical corridors with relatively extreme working angles. We aimed to: 1) analyze the institutional preliminary case-based data on the use of the Robotic 3D Exoscope AEOS Aesculap in three different PCF approaches: retrosigmoid (RSA), midline suboccipital (MSA), and supracerebellar infratentorial via feedbacks was collected using a 20-point questionnaire, and 2) perform a comprehensive review of the literature concerning the use of EX in PCF surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients with neurosurgical pathologies underwent a neurosurgical procedure using the EX (Robotic 3D exoscope AEOS Aesculap) at our institution between January and March 2022. 21 surgeons were involved in the abovementioned PCF surgeries and answered the questionnaire. The main perceived advantages were in terms of ergonomics (67%), magnification (52%), and visualization of extreme angles. The main reported disadvantage was color vision (16, 76%), followed by manual mobility (24%). Concerning the review, the search of the literature yielded a total of 177 results. Upon full-text review, 17 articles were included, including 153 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the advantages and challenges associated with using the exoscope in posterior fossa surgery, setting a precedent as the first to report on a questionnaire-based analysis of exoscope utilization in this specific domain.

Intraoperative Performance with the Exoscope in Spine Surgery: An Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Exoscope use in spinal neurosurgery has become a promising surgical option providing enhanced operative field visibility and ergonomics. However, data on its use in spine surgery are underreported in the literature. We aimed to assess the intraoperative outcomes in exoscope-assisted spine surgery compared with similar procedures performed using the operative microscope.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all spinal surgeries performed using an exoscope and, subsequently, an equal number of operative microscope cases performed by 2 senior surgeons at a single institution from 2016 to 2023. The variables included demographics, clinical presentation, surgical treatment, and operative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 123 exoscope spinal surgeries were performed on 116 unique patients with a mean age of 67 ± 14 years, of whom 60 (52%) were women. The microscope group included 126 surgeries on 120 unique patients with a mean age of 62 ± 14 years, of whom 53 (45%) were women. The mean blood loss (28 mL vs. 132 mL; P = 0.0009), operative time (83 minutes vs. 103 minutes; P = 0.006), and length of stay (1.04 days vs. 1.73 days; P = 0.02) were significantly less for the exoscope group than for the microscope group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the exoscope resulted in a shorter operative time, less blood loss, a shorter length of stay, and favorable clinical outcomes compared with the use of the operative microscope. Neurosurgeons should consider this seemingly efficacious and ergonomically favorable visual technology for spinal surgeries.

From Microscopic to Exoscopic Microsurgery: Are We Facing a Change of Paradigm?

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgery is a medical branch characterized by small and deep surgical field with the need of manipulation and dissection of anatomical structures. High light and magnification are required in order to avoid injuries to important anatomical structures and to avoid permanent neurological deficits. Introduction of operative microscope made a change of paradigm in neurosurgery allowing to better see what could not be seen with common light. Nowadays, introduction of several technologies have increased the safety and efficacy of neurosurgery. Among new technologies, the 3D exoscope is emerging pretending to shift the paradigm of microneurosurgery. In this work, we aim to show our first experience with the use of the exoscope showing advantages and disadvantages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our surgical database from the introduction of the exoscope in our department (in November 2020 temporarily; then from November 2021 definitively) searching for all the microsurgery interventions performed in the period.

RESULTS

From the introduction of the exoscope in our department, we operated 244 cases with the OM and 228 with the exoscope. We operated 175 lesions located in the supratentorial compartment, 29 in the infratentorial, and 24 in the spinal column. Regarding the OM, the ratios were as follows: 122 females and 122 males; 235 adults and 9 children; 66 supratentorial lesions, 14 infratentorial lesions, and 164 spine surgeries. Our team showed a progressive switch from the microscope to the exoscope. Only one member of our team preferred to continue to use the standard operative microscope.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience showed no complications related to the use of the exoscope that proved to be safe and effective both for surgery and teaching.

High-Definition 3D Exoscope in Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology: A Systematic Literature Review

This PRISMA-compliant systematic review aimed to investigate the use of and the most common procedures performed with the novel 3D 4K exoscope in surgical pediatric head and neck settings.

METHODS

Search criteria were applied to PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Review databases and included all studies published up to January 2023 reporting 3D 4K exoscope-assisted surgeries in pediatric patients. After the removal of duplicates, selection of abstracts and full-text articles, and quality assessment, we reviewed eligible articles for number of patients treated, age, surgical procedures, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 54 potentially relevant records, 5 studies were considered eligible and included in this systematic review, with reported treatment data for 182 patients. The surgical procedures belong to the otologic field (121 cases), head and neck surgery (25 cases) and transoral surgery (36 cases). Exoscopy allowed high quality visualization of anatomical structures during cochlear implantation and during reconstruction in head and neck surgery; moreover, it improved the surgical view of surgeons, spectators and ENT students.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 3D 4K exoscopy has shown promising potential as a valuable tool in pediatric ORL-head and neck surgery; nevertheless, further validation of these encouraging outcomes is necessary through larger-scale studies specifically focused on pediatric patients.

Assessing the Training in Neurosurgery with the Implementation of VITOM-3D Exoscope: Learning Curve on Experimental Model in Neurosurgical Practice

(1) Background: Innovation and continuous demand in the field of visual enhancing technologies and video streaming have led to the discovery of new systems capable of improving visualization and illumination of the surgical field. The exoscope was brought into neurosurgical routine, and nearly ten years later, modern 3D systems have been introduced and tested, giving encouraging results. (2) Methods: In order to evaluate the surgeon's confidence with the exoscope and their increasing ability in terms of time spent and quality of the final achievement since their first encounter with the technique, an experimental trial on 18 neurosurgeons from a single Institution was performed to evaluate the learning curve for the use of the VITOM-3D exoscope in neurosurgical practice on a model of brain and dura mater. (3) Results: A significant improvement in the quality of the performance, number of errors made, and reduction in the time was found after the third iteration of the task, by when almost all the participants felt more comfortable and confident. No significant differences between senior neurosurgeons and resident neurosurgeons were reported. (4) Conclusions: Our results show that three iterations are enough to gain confidence with the exoscope from its first use, regardless of previous experience and training with an operating microscope.

Exoscopic Microsurgery: A Change of Paradigm in Brain Tumor Surgery? Comparison with Standard Operative Microscope

BACKGROUND

The exoscope is a high-definition telescope recently introduced in neurosurgery. In the past few years, several reports have described the advantages and disadvantages of such technology. No studies have compared results of surgery with standard microscope and exoscope in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS

Our retrospective study encompassed 177 patients operated on for GBM (WHO 2021) between February 2017 and August 2022. A total of 144 patients were operated on with a microscope only and the others with a 3D4K exoscope only. All clinical and radiological data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been estimated in the two groups and compared by the Cox model adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, gross total resection, MGMT methylated promoter, and operator's experience).

RESULTS

IDH was mutated in 9 (5.2%) patients and MGMT was methylated in 76 (44.4%). Overall, 122 patients received a gross total resection, 14 patients received a subtotal resection, and 41 patients received a partial resection. During follow-up, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced tumor recurrence and 18.7% of them received a second surgery. After truncation to 12 months, the median PFS for patients operated on with the microscope was 8.82 months, while for patients operated on with the exoscope it was >12 months. Instead, the OS was comparable in the two groups. The multivariable Cox model showed that the use of microscope compared to the exoscope was associated with lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.66-7.56, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The exoscope has proven efficacy in terms of surgical resection, which was not different to that of the microscope. Furthermore, patients operated on with the exoscope had a longer PFS. A comparable OS was observed between microscope and exoscope, but further prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed.