The Challenges of 21st Century Neurotoxicology: The Case of Neurotoxicology Applied to Nanomaterials

Significant shifts in preclinical and clinical neurotoxicology: a review and commentary

The ever-expanding prevalence of adverse neurotoxic reactions of the brain in response to therapeutic and recreational drugs, dietary supplements, environmental hazards, cosmetic ingredients, a spectrum of herbals, health status, and environmental stressors continues to prompt the development of novel cell-based assays to better determine neurotoxic hazard. Neurotoxicants may cause direct and epigenetic damage to the nervous tissue and alter the chemistry, structure, or normal activity of the nervous system. In severe neurotoxicity due to exposure to physical or psychosocial toxicants, neurons are disrupted or killed, and a consistent pattern of clinical neural dysfunction appears. In utero exposure to neurotoxicants can lead to altered development of the nervous system [developmental neurotoxicity (DNT)]. Patients with certain disorders and certain genomic makeup may be particularly susceptible to neurotoxicants. Traditional cytotoxicity measurements, like cell death, are easy to measure, but insufficient at identifying current routine biomarkers of toxicity including functional impairment in cell communication, which often occurs before or even in the absence of cell death. The present paper examines some of the limitations of existing neurotoxicology in light of the increasing need to develop tools to meet the challenges of achieving greater sensitivity in detection and developing and standardizing methods for exploring the toxicologic risk of such neurotoxic entities as engineered nanomaterials and even variables associated with poverty.

Roadbumps at the Crossroads of Integrating Behavioral and In Vitro Approaches for Neurotoxicity Assessment

With the appreciation that behavior represents the integration and complexity of the nervous system, neurobehavioral phenotyping and assessment has seen a renaissance over the last couple of decades, resulting in a robust database on rodent performance within various testing paradigms, possible associations with human disorders, and therapeutic interventions. The interchange of data across behavior and other test modalities and multiple model systems has advanced our understanding of fundamental biology and mechanisms associated with normal functions and alterations in the nervous system. While there is a demonstrated value and power of neurobehavioral assessments for examining alterations due to genetic manipulations, maternal factors, early development environment, the applied use of behavior to assess environmental neurotoxicity continues to come under question as to whether behavior represents a sensitive endpoint for assessment. Why is rodent behavior a sensitive tool to the neuroscientist and yet, not when used in pre-clinical or chemical neurotoxicity studies? Applying new paradigms and evidence on the biological basis of behavior to neurobehavioral testing requires expertise and refinement of how such experiments are conducted to minimize variability and maximize information. This review presents relevant issues of methods used to conduct such test, sources of variability, experimental design, data analysis, interpretation, and reporting. It presents beneficial and critical limitations as they translate to the in vivo environment and considers the need to integrate across disciplines for the best value. It proposes that a refinement of behavioral assessments and understanding of subtle pronounced differences will facilitate the integration of data obtained across multiple approaches and to address issues of translation.