Comparative toxicity assessment of glyphosate and two commercial formulations in the planarian Dugesia japonica

Ecotoxicological evaluation and regeneration impairment of planarians by dibutyl phthalate

Commonly utilized as a plasticizer in the food and chemical sectors, Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) poses threats to the environment and human well-being as it seeps or moves into the surroundings. Nevertheless, research on the harmfulness of DBP to aquatic organisms is limited, and its impact on stem cells and tissue regeneration remains unidentified. Planarians, recognized for their robust regenerative capabilities and sensitivity to aquatic pollutants, are emerging animal models in toxicology. This study investigated the comprehensive toxicity effects of environmentally relevant levels of DBP on planarians. It revealed potential toxicity mechanisms through the use of immunofluorescence, chromatin dispersion assay, Western blot, quantitative real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), chromatin behavioral and histological analyses, immunofluorescence, and terminal dUTP nickel-end labeling (TUNEL). Findings illustrated that DBP caused morphological and motor abnormalities, tissue damage, regenerative inhibition, and developmental neurotoxicity. Further research revealed increased apoptosis and suppressed stem cell proliferation and differentiation, disrupting a balance of cell proliferation and death, ultimately leading to morphological defects and functional abnormalities. This was attributed to oxidative stress and DNA damage caused by excessive release of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This exploration furnishes fresh perspectives on evaluating the toxicity peril posed by DBP in aquatic organisms.

How neurobehavior and brain development in alternative whole-organism models can contribute to prediction of developmental neurotoxicity

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) is not routinely evaluated in chemical risk assessment because current test paradigms for DNT require the use of mammalian models which are ethically controversial, expensive, and resource demanding. Consequently, efforts have focused on revolutionizing DNT testing through affordable novel alternative methods for risk assessment. The goal is to develop a DNT in vitro test battery amenable to high-throughput screening (HTS). Currently, the DNT in vitro test battery consists primarily of human cell-based assays because of their immediate relevance to human health. However, such cell-based assays alone are unable to capture the complexity of a developing nervous system. Whole organismal systems that qualify as 3 R (Replace, Reduce and Refine) models are urgently needed to complement cell-based DNT testing. These models can provide the necessary organismal context and be used to explore the impact of chemicals on brain function by linking molecular and/or cellular changes to behavioural readouts. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the planarian Dugesia japonica, and embryos of the zebrafish Danio rerio are all suited to low-cost HTS and each has unique strengths for DNT testing. Here, we review the strengths and the complementarity of these organisms in a novel, integrative context and highlight how they can augment current cell-based assays for more comprehensive and robust DNT screening of chemicals. Considering the limitations of all in vitro test systems, we discuss how a smart combinatory use of these systems will contribute to a better human relevant risk assessment of chemicals that considers the complexity of the developing brain.

Oxidative Stress and Cytotoxicity Induced by Co-Formulants of Glyphosate-Based Herbicides in Human Mononuclear White Blood Cells

The use of genetically modified, glyphosate-resistant crops has led to the widespread application of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), making them one of the most widely used herbicide formulations on the market. To enhance the efficacy of the active ingredient, GBHs used in practice often contain other ingredients marked as inert "adjuvants" or "co-formulants", the toxic properties of which are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to compare the cytotoxic effects of pure glyphosate, three GBHs (Roundup Mega, Fozat 480 and Glyfos) and two co-formulants commonly used in GBHs as assessed via CCK-8 assay, and the extent of their potential oxidative damage as assessed via superoxide dismutase (SOD) assay, in order to reveal the role of adjuvants in the toxicity of the formulations. Our results showed that glyphosate alone did not significantly affect cell viability. In contrast, GBHs and adjuvants induced a pronounced cytotoxic effect from a concentration of 100 μM. SOD activity of cells treated with GBHs or adjuvants was significantly lower compared to cells treated with glyphosate alone. This suggests that the adjuvants in GBHs are responsible for the cytotoxic effects of the formulations through the induction of oxidative stress.