Plant Defensin γ-Thionin Induces MAPKs and Activates Histone Deacetylases in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells Infected With Staphylococcus aureus

Antifungal Plant Defensins as an Alternative Tool to Combat Candidiasis

Currently, the spread of fungal infections is becoming an urgent problem. Fungi of the Candida genus are opportunistic microorganisms that cause superficial and life-threatening systemic candidiasis in immunocompromised patients. The list of antifungal drugs for the treatment of candidiasis is very limited, while the prevalence of resistant strains is growing rapidly. Therefore, the search for new antimycotics, including those exhibiting immunomodulatory properties, is of great importance. Plenty of natural compounds with antifungal activities may be extremely useful in solving this problem. This review evaluates the features of natural antimicrobial peptides, namely plant defensins as possible prototypes of new anticandidal agents. Plant defensins are important components of the innate immune system, which provides the first line of defense against pathogens. The introduction presents a brief summary regarding pathogenic Candida species, the pathogenesis of candidiasis, and the mechanisms of antimycotic resistance. Then, the structural features of plant defensins, their anticandidal activities, their mechanisms of action on yeast-like fungi, their ability to prevent adhesion and biofilm formation, and their combined action with conventional antimycotics are described. The possible mechanisms of fungal resistance to plant defensins, their cytotoxic activity, and their effectiveness in in vivo experiments are also discussed. In addition, for the first time for plant defensins, knowledge about their immunomodulatory effects is also presented.

The plant defensins PaDef and γ-thionin inhibit the endothelial cell response to VEGF

Angiogenesis is involved in wound repair and tissue maintenance but is associated with diverse diseases. Pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regulate this process. Therefore, searching for treatments to inhibit or promote angiogenesis is attractive. Reports from our group showed that plant antimicrobial peptides (PAPs) PaDef from avocado and γ-thionin from habanero pepper are cytotoxic on cancer cells. However, their functions as angiogenic regulators are unknown. In this work, we evaluate the effect of PaDef and γ-thionin on the angiogenic processes of two different endothelial cell lines: bovine endothelial cells (BUVEC) and the human endothelial cell line EA.hy926. The results showed that VEGF (10ng/mL) stimulated the BUVEC (40 ± 7%) and EA.hy926 cell proliferation (30 ± 9%); however, peptides (5-500ng/mL) reverted this effect. Besides, VEGF increased the migration of BUVEC (20 ± 8%) and EA.hy926 cells (50 ± 6%), but both PAPs (5ng/mL) inhibited the VEGF stimulus (100%). Furthermore, DMOG 50μM (an inhibitor of HIF-hydroxylase) was used in BUVEC and EA.hy926 cells to determine the effect of hypoxia on VEGF and peptide activities. The DMOG reverted the inhibitory action of both peptides (100%), indicating that peptides act through a HIF-independent pathway. Also, the PAPs do not affect the tube formation but decrease it in EA.hy926 cells stimulated with VEGF (100%). Additionally, docking assays showed a possible interaction between PAPs and the VEGF receptor. These results suggest that plant defensins PaDef and γ-thionin are potential angiogenic modulators of the VEGF activity on endothelial cells.

Prolactin regulates H3K9ac and H3K9me2 epigenetic marks and miRNAs expression in bovine mammary epithelial cells challenged with Staphylococcus aureus

Epigenetic mechanisms are essential in the regulation of immune response during infections. Changes in the levels of reproductive hormones, such as prolactin, compromise the mammary gland’s innate immune response (IIR); however, its effect on epigenetic marks is poorly known. This work explored the epigenetic regulation induced by bovine prolactin (bPRL) on bovine mammary epithelial cells (bMECs) challenged with Staphylococcus aureus. In this work, bMECs were treated as follows: (1) control cells without any treatment, (2) bMECs treated with bPRL (5 ng/ml) at different times (12 or 24 h), (3) bMECs challenged with S. aureus for 2 h, and (4) bMECs treated with bPRL at different times (12 or 24 h), and then challenged with S. aureus 2 h. By western blot analyses of histones, we determined that the H3K9ac mark decreased (20%) in bMECs treated with bPRL (12 h) and challenged with S. aureus, while the H3K9me2 mark was increased (50%) in the same conditions. Also, this result coincided with an increase (2.3-fold) in HDAC activity analyzed using the cellular histone deacetylase fluorescent kit FLUOR DE LYS^®. ChIP-qPCRs were performed to determine if the epigenetic marks detected in the histones correlate with enriched marks in the promoter regions of inflammatory genes associated with the S. aureus challenge. The H3K9ac mark was enriched in the promoter region of IL-1β, IL-10, and BNBD10 genes (1.5, 2.5, 7.5-fold, respectively) in bMECs treated with bPRL, but in bMECs challenged with S. aureus it was reduced. Besides, the H3K9me2 mark was enriched in the promoter region of IL-1β and IL-10 genes (3.5 and 2.5-fold, respectively) in bMECs challenged with S. aureus but was inhibited by bPRL. Additionally, the expression of several miRNAs was analyzed by qPCR. Let-7a-5p, miR-21a, miR-30b, miR-155, and miR-7863 miRNAs were up-regulated (2, 1.5, 10, 1.5, 3.9-fold, respectively) in bMECs challenged with S. aureus; however, bPRL induced a down-regulation in the expression of these miRNAs. In conclusion, bPRL induces epigenetic regulation on specific IIR elements, allowing S. aureus to persist and evade the host immune response.