Hawkes C, Morris J, Bavcar S, Wilkie C, Ray S, Auquier C, Benjamin S, Massó JB, Bottin S, Davies O, Desmas‐Bazelle I, Einhorn A, Figueroa‐Gonzalez C, Holenova K, Kritsotalaki E, Peak K, Smallwood K, Treggiari E, Valenti P, de la Virgen MG, Fournier Q. Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study.
J Vet Intern Med 2024;
38:3193-3205. [PMID:
39422460 PMCID:
PMC11586558 DOI:
10.1111/jvim.17222]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared.
OBJECTIVES
Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes.
ANIMALS
Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25.
METHODS
Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021.
RESULTS
The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE
Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.
Collapse