The Universal Triangle to Ensure Health Security

Synergising universal health coverage and global health security in the Western Pacific Region

Background

Universal health coverage (UHC) and global health security (GHS) should be pursued synergistically to strengthen health systems. However, existing studies found that the efforts toward the two agendas were divergent worldwide. We reviewed the synergy status between UHC and GHS in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) to provide evidence for decision-makers to promote synergy.

Methods

We collected the UHC service coverage index (UHC SCI) and the GHS index (GHSI) scores. We created a four-quadrant diagram to discover the gap in UHC and GHS capacities within WPR and divide WPR countries into four groups based on the global mean scores. Further, we adopted global spatial autocorrelation analysis to discover spatial aggregations of high and low scores by calculating Moran's I. In addition, we conducted a correlation analysis to assess the synergy level in WPR and reveal the gap between Pacific Island countries or territories (PICTs) and non-PICTs. We conducted key informant interviews to uncover actual scenarios and address gaps in the quantitative evidence.

Results

Compared to the global mean UHC SCI and GHSI scores, nine out of 13 non-PICTs had higher scores, while all 14 of the PICTs had lower scores for both indexes. The Moran's I for WPR countries' UHC SCI and GHSI scores in 2021 were 0.20 and 0.23, respectively (Z-score >2.58; P < 0.01). The correlation coefficients between the two index scores were 0.722 (P < 0.001) at the global level and 0.869 (P < 0.001) at WPR. Within the WPR, the correlation coefficients were 0.859 (P < 0.001) in the non-PICTs and -0.026 (P > 0.05) in the PICTs.

Conclusions

The synergy level between UHC and GHS was high in the WPR, but this mainly came from the synergy in the non-PICTs. The two agendas have barely synergised the PICTs. To build a safer and healthier WPR, it is important to pay more attention to the countries that have weaker health capacities in the region and narrow the gap.

Institutionalization for good governance to reach sustainable health development: a framework analysis

BACKGROUND

This article explores the concept of institutionalization, which is the process of transforming ideas into programs and automating actions, in the context of health system governance and sustainable development. Institutionalization is a key mechanism for creating accountable and transparent institutions, which are essential for achieving health system resilience and sustainability. This study identifies the components and dimensions of institutionalization in the health system and its relationship with good governance and sustainable health development.

MAIN TEXT

We applied a scoping review method in five steps. First, we formulated a question for our research. Then, we concluded a comprehensive literature search in five electronic databases for identifying relevant studies. This review has two phases: identifying the concept of institutional approach and its components in health system, and its relationship with good governance to reach Sustainable Health Development (SHD). The third step was study selection, and the 1st author performed data abstraction. The key issues which are identified in our review, related to the concepts of SDH, its goals, pillars and principles; positive peace; good governance; components of institutional approach components, and their relations. Finally, we summarized and organized our findings in a format of a proposed conceptual framework, to underpin the role of institutionalization in the health system to achieve sustainable development.

CONCLUSION

Institutionalization is a key concept for achieving positive peace and good governance, which requires meaningful involvement of leaders, politicians, civil society, and public participation. It also depends on the conditions of justice, human rights, transparency, accountability and rule of law. In the wake of COVID-19, institutionalization is more crucial than ever for advancing sustainable development, especially in the context of low and middle-income countries (LMICs).